I definitely consider it a possibility. Though, sadly, Apple underestimates screen estate. Their bloated argument "this has a higher resolution than a 60" TV" supports my claim. Apple is acting as if resolution is all that matters - It's not.
Don't get me wrong: Retina displays are a great idea. And I LOVE the alleged 75% reduction in reflection with glass in front of the screen. But we all know that retina comes at a cost. GPU and the battery is suffering tremendously. Speaking for myself, I'd much prefer better battery life and GPU performance.
I swear: At the distance from which I use my MBP 17" I have a VERY hard time telling a difference between text on my iPad 3 and the 1920*1200 res screen. And this comes from a guy who found the res of the iPad 2 to be unbearable to read on at the typical reading distance of an iPad.
Don't get me wrong: Retina displays are a great idea. And I LOVE the alleged 75% reduction in reflection with glass in front of the screen. But we all know that retina comes at a cost. GPU and the battery is suffering tremendously. Speaking for myself, I'd much prefer better battery life and GPU performance.
I swear: At the distance from which I use my MBP 17" I have a VERY hard time telling a difference between text on my iPad 3 and the 1920*1200 res screen. And this comes from a guy who found the res of the iPad 2 to be unbearable to read on at the typical reading distance of an iPad.