Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lindsay Lohan Poses Nude for New York Magazine
- Thread starter joeshell383
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I think these are cool. Yeah, she doesn't look so good in some of them, but neither did Monroe. That seems to be the point. I love these photos, and kudos to her for doing the nudes. I've gone nude in films before, and it's very liberating. Ain't nothin' wrong with the clothes you were born with. 
Seriously? Oh please. Out of your league? Definitely. From your attitude, I'd say most decent women are out of your league.
Seriously? Oh please. Out of your league? Definitely. From your attitude, I'd say most decent women are out of your league.
That's just sad. That girl could have been better than Marilyn. Copies are never as good as the original...
This made me laugh so much, you set yourself up to get flamed!
Now back to the original question
She still looks hot, like other posters have said, not supermodel material but most the time they are not hot anyway. She has nice curves and anyway kudos to her for getting her kit off in a large magazine. I certainly would not have the balls!!!!
Ahhh, spoken like a true Brit
And for the record... Deffo agree! Might even stretch to a curry or possibly a kebab afterwards!!
Ahhh, the smell of misogyny in this thread is rather overwhelming. Tossing around terms like "slut" and "skank", rather rude sexual innuendo and out right comments.
And don't worry boys, it doesn't matter if she's in your league or not, since she's historically dated girls, but let me guess, it's just because she hasn't been with a real man like you, huh?
I swear to god, the amount of male insecurity around here just cracks me up.
As to the whole photo shoot. Better than I could do, but then again, I'm a terrible photographer, s'why I stick to pencils and inks for my work.
As to the freckles, totally lovable, my current girlfriend is a frecklesplosion, and I love it. Lindsey herself, I have to admit, she's wearing her party lifestyle on her face, but people have turned it around, like Drew Barrymore. Lastly, let's not white wash the fact that Marilyn was a partyholic in her time, and was well known for her infidelities, so if you're going to toss those wonderful words at Miss Lohan, don't be a hypocrite by acting like Ms Monroe was somehow more pure and innocent.
And don't worry boys, it doesn't matter if she's in your league or not, since she's historically dated girls, but let me guess, it's just because she hasn't been with a real man like you, huh?
I swear to god, the amount of male insecurity around here just cracks me up.
As to the whole photo shoot. Better than I could do, but then again, I'm a terrible photographer, s'why I stick to pencils and inks for my work.
As to the freckles, totally lovable, my current girlfriend is a frecklesplosion, and I love it. Lindsey herself, I have to admit, she's wearing her party lifestyle on her face, but people have turned it around, like Drew Barrymore. Lastly, let's not white wash the fact that Marilyn was a partyholic in her time, and was well known for her infidelities, so if you're going to toss those wonderful words at Miss Lohan, don't be a hypocrite by acting like Ms Monroe was somehow more pure and innocent.
I think I also mentioned before that this photo shoot wasn't Marilyn at her finest either, but the photos were cool. That's what I like about these- they're flawed.
I don't really know who she is outside of someone I hear about on the web from time to time. In my opinion, the question is less one about her looks than about why anyone felt the need to recreate these images with her specifically. Monroe was older, presumably, when her shoot was done and more established. It seems like a very odd thing to do IMHO. The photos almost seem like parodies, but I'm not sure who or what is being parodied.
Totally agree - I just don't understand the people judging this fellow human being in such a nasty way.
I hope none of you are ever in a position that you are pulled apart by people such as yourselves.
Them photos don't look good. Not my cuppa tea anyways.
Also if you choose to live relentlessly in the publics view and participate in events to get yourself known then expect the potential fallout that may follow. When it comes to attention seekers they become fair game.
Also if you choose to live relentlessly in the publics view and participate in events to get yourself known then expect the potential fallout that may follow. When it comes to attention seekers they become fair game.
I don't think any kind of portraiture should be manipulated. I want to see the person as they are. Imperfections are hallmarks of authenticity. And I can't stand processed images. They have such a smugness to them. Yuck.
Yes to all of that.
At least half right. I don't like reshoots/remakes. Why not do something, like, ORIGINAL? Nah, would never fly, would it...
Even here she's fine, more or less. I guess if you find a person attractive you can see it always, even when they're not at their best. She's still a beautiful woman.
People seek attention - not news - does that mean it is OK to pull them apart call them a slut etc. I'm sorry but that is quite sad.
If she would stop getting lip injections and Botox she wouldn't look so bad. I don't know who is telling these women that those procedures make them more attractive. It doesn't. I don't know If I've ever seen a woman that looked better because of plastic surgery. It usually makes them look worse.
With all that said I would still smash her without question.
With all that said I would still smash her without question.
You seem to be obsessed with her. Are you okay? Might want to make an appointment to talk to someone about that, if you know what I mean.
