Mod Note: These posts where moved from this thread and are referring to the story contained there.
So . . . we're going to discuss piracy and warez now?
So . . . we're going to discuss piracy and warez now?
Hit the report post button and see what happens!This could have simply been reported without any reference at all to "hackintoshes" or "create their own netbook Macs."
As it stands, it's now a discussion about piracy.
https://macrumors.zendesk.com/hc/en-us
Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help.
So telling people that support has been re-enabled for a hack whose "purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods" and pointing them to the website where they can be instructed on how to deploy this "workaround" is what?
Hit the report post button and see what happens!![]()
Not much else you can do.
So . . . we're going to discuss piracy and warez now?
Thank you! This is the most ridiculous header to put on front page news. Gimme a break, are we now accepting piracy and hacking of software as "acceptable"? What's next, serial keys posted on MR's front page news? Why don't these hackintosh people let this go, Apple's OS wasn't made for their computer of choice so move on and stick with Windows.
So how does freedom of speech come into all this? Maybe newspapers should stop reporting on crimes and murders? I mean how dare they report on how a crime was committed, is that not like telling you how to do it. There is a difference between reporting news and carrying out the crime.
Thank you! This is the most ridiculous header to put on front page news. Gimme a break, are we now accepting piracy and hacking of software as "acceptable"? What's next, serial keys posted on MR's front page news? Why don't these hackintosh people let this go, Apple's OS wasn't made for their computer of choice so move on and stick with Windows.
The MR article does much more than simply post news about subject. I'll repost:
This could have simply been reported without any reference at all to "hackintoshes" or "create their own netbook Macs."
As it stands, it's now a discussion about piracy.
https://macrumors.zendesk.com/hc/en-us
Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help.
So telling people that support has been re-enabled for a hack whose "purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods" and pointing them to the website where they can be instructed on how to deploy this "workaround" is what?
The link goes directly to insanelymac.com
This could have simply been reported without any reference at all to "hackintoshes" or "create their own netbook Macs."
As it stands, it's now a discussion about piracy.
https://macrumors.zendesk.com/hc/en-us
Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help.
So telling people that support has been re-enabled for a hack whose "purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods" and pointing them to the website where they can be instructed on how to deploy this "workaround" is what?
The MR article does much more than simply post news about the subject. I'll repost:
This could have simply been reported without any reference at all to "hackintoshes" or "create their own netbook Macs."
As it stands, it's now a discussion about piracy.
https://macrumors.zendesk.com/hc/en-us
Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help.
So telling people that support has been re-enabled for a hack whose "purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods" and pointing them to the website where they can be instructed on how to deploy this "workaround" is what?
The "workaround" link in the article goes directly to insanelymac.com.
So . . . we're going to discuss piracy and warez now?
No, the purpose of the hack is not to “break or bypass software licensing methods”.
Most certainly is. It is in direct violation of Apple's SLA.
". . . obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation."
Which means, you are using OS X in such a way that it violates its license. And MR is pointing you to the site showing you how to do it, which is expressly forbidden in MR's forum rules.
Here is the section in full:
"Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help."
The purpose of the hack is to create a kernel that can work on an Intel Atom processor. Or are people not allowed to modify their kernel now, too?
See above.
The fact that no Apple branded computer uses an Atom is besides the point. This is merely kernel modification, and kernel modification is completely legal.
Nope.
But really, you’re just being pedantic.
Do you even know what piracy and warez are?
I call it information and news. No one is forcing commit the act. I do not even have an atom processor, I opened the link and read it. People who want to learn how to build a hackintosh are not going to be coming to macrumours. They will go to these sites directly.
I am sure a number of you will get this link removed soon, I really think its an non event, and just news.
One thing that everyone is overlooking is that this is not piracy, you go out, but a copy of OS X and install it.
.. . .. ..
See above, and see the relevant section in MR's forum rules.
Right. Every single Hacintosh owner has actually bought a legal retail version of OS X? No one is forcing? So how is this different from providing google link where first link is k'ed app download? No one is forcing a lot of things, but that's not the point.
This arguably does the same thing: http://eshop.macsales.com/OSXCenter/XPostFacto/
Is that “piracy” and “warez” too?
By your logic, discussing VCRs is against forum rules since I can use one to tape movies off TV.
Thank you! This is the most ridiculous header to put on front page news. Gimme a break, are we now accepting piracy and hacking of software as "acceptable"? What's next, serial keys posted on MR's front page news? Why don't these hackintosh people let this go, Apple's OS wasn't made for their computer of choice so move on and stick with Windows.
Don't dodge the issue with unrelated analogies.
We're talking about software here and specifically, the software license agreement, and how MR's article violates its own forum rules, which it clearly does.
Again:
". . . obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation."
Which means, you are using OS X in such a way that it violates its license. And MR is pointing you to the site showing you how to do it, which is expressly forbidden in MR's forum rules.
Here is the section in full:
"Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc.By your logic, discussing VCRs is against forum rules since I can use one to tape movies off TV.
Ok LTD, how exactly does this affect you? Do you think that a handful of hackintosh users are going to bring Apple sales down in any way? They won't. Just let this go, this is nothing more than news on a topic many people are interested in.
But really, youre just being a pedantic troll.
Don't dodge the issue with unrelated analogies. "Argubaly" and VCRs don't count in any way, shape, or form.
We're talking about software here and specifically, the software license agreement, and how MR's article violates its own forum rules, which it clearly does.
Again:
". . . obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation."
Which means, you are using OS X in such a way that it violates its license. And MR is pointing you to the site showing you how to do it, which is expressly forbidden in MR's forum rules.
Here is the section in full:
"Warez/Serials/Keys. Do not post software serial numbers or keys or refer people to specific websites, software, or techniques whose purpose is to break or bypass software licensing methods, distribute cracks, or obtain or use commercial software or media in violation of its license and/or for copyright violation. Do not ask for or give such help."