Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

delegagtor

macrumors regular
Oct 5, 2015
103
204
My wife is running a 2008 MacBook pro which will not be supported. That's not a big deal, because we are going to get her a new system anyway. What *IS* a big deal is the lack of hardware updates (aside from friggin' watch bands) for the MacBook Air or MacBook Pro. A 12" screen will NOT cut it, and I'm not going to drop $2000+ on 2-year-old technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nookster

mic j

macrumors 68030
Mar 15, 2012
2,664
156
I feel everyone's pain, but I kind of agree with the comment, "What's wrong with El Capitan that you can't just keep using that? Why is that not an option for you?"...
It is. I am concerned about not getting future security updates. Just because I have an old Mac that is stable with a certain OS, doesn't mean I want to be vulnerable to new threats. But...in the end, that may be the risk I have to take.
 

commander.data

macrumors 65816
Nov 10, 2006
1,058
187
[also posted this reply to your comment at Ars]

This is interesting but is likely not the reason. Note that the mid 2009 13" MacBook Pro (NOT Sierra supported) and the mid 2010 13" MacBook Pro (is Sierra supported) use the same AirPort/Bluetooth board:
Mid 2009 13" MacBook Pro Airport Card
Mid 2010 13" MacBook Pro Airport Card
(yes they are using the same photo in both guides, so we do have to trust that iFixit has this right)

The 13" MacBook Pro can have quite different internals than the 15" or 17" for a given model year (e.g. in the mid-2010 models, the 15" and 17" went to i5 and i7 chips while the 13" stayed with Core 2 Duo; 13" never had two GPUs) so you can't generalize across the 3 screen sizes.

If someone can figure out the critical difference between the mid 2009 and mid 2010 13" MacBook Pros that causes the difference in Sierra support, then we might have a better understanding. The known changes for the mid 2010 are unofficial support for 16 GB RAM (instead of 8), a slightly faster CPU (albeit from the same "Penryn" Core 2 Duo family), and a newer GeForce 320M GPU (but apparently the older 9400M is in some other supported machines). Also a better trackpad, battery, and enhanced audio passing over mini-display port.
Good catch on the older Airport card making it into the supported Mid 2010 13" MacBook Pro. The mystery deepens or perhaps we are thinking too deeply about this and choosing which systems to support really was just arbitrary on Apple's part.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_(microarchitecture)#Steppings_using_45nm_process

One other thing I was considering though was CPU steppings. The E0/R0 stepping for Penryn was introduced in late 2008 and added two new instructions that are intended to be used by OS for fast context switching of processes. Perhaps those instructions are now required? Many Penryn CPU models were available in multiple steppings and Intel continues to sell older steppings simultaneously with newer steppings of a CPU until stock runs out, so it may be that it was only starting in Late 2009 that Apple can guarantee that all Macs are using the E0/R0 stepping. The issue with this is that the Late 2009 Mac Mini is not supported even though it looks like it's three CPU options should all be using the E0/R0 stepping.
 

steve333

macrumors 65816
Dec 12, 2008
1,310
919
Interesting that the late 2009 minis are supported but not the early 2009 ones. I can't imagine why considering they are identical except for 2.0/2.26ghz CPUs instead of 2.26/2.53.

The list states only 2010 and up Mini's. My 2009 Mini that I gave to my mother is so slow after installing El Capitan that I wouldn't have installed Sierra anyway.
 

estabya

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2014
687
727
The list states only 2010 and up Mini's. My 2009 Mini that I gave to my mother is so slow after installing El Capitan that I wouldn't have installed Sierra anyway.

Oh wow you are right haha. Idk how I misread that.
 

joebclash

macrumors regular
Jun 14, 2016
209
119
Frustrates me -_-

I'm more concerned for the 2008 and 2009 Macbook Aluniniums and Macbook Pros..
[doublepost=1465889749][/doublepost]Can I encourage everyone here who is unhappy to submit feedback to Apple and email Tim Cook - might not do much but might make them realise that some people are unhappy.

I'm an app developer and have a 2008 Mac Pro. I've upgraded it over the years with SSD and PCIe sata III cards and USB 3. It runs great still. It can match any modern Mac in terms of usability. I'm not surprise but disappointed Apple dropped support for 2008 Mac Pro. I really don't see a tech reason for this. Being a developer, the newest version of xcode always makes you upgrade to latest OS. Now I'm stuck because I can't upgrade. This is a very anti-consumer and developer move by Apple. This may force me to move my main development to windows. This is a sad day for me...
 

MacsRgr8

macrumors G3
Sep 8, 2002
8,293
1,787
The Netherlands
Okay.

I've read through most of the posts, but I couldn't find the true reason for the requires specs.

Is it:
a) Bluetooth LE (i.e. v 4.0)
b) AirDrop capability
c) Wifi specs
d) ...?

Thus
- what is the difference between Mac Pro 2009 and 2010?
- what is the difference between MacBook 2009 and Mac mini 2009
- ...?
 

MarkCollette

macrumors 68000
Mar 6, 2003
1,559
36
Toronto, Canada
Being a developer, the newest version of xcode always makes you upgrade to latest OS. Now I'm stuck because I can't upgrade. This is a very anti-consumer and developer move by Apple. This may force me to move my main development to windows. This is a sad day for me...

In the Platforms State of the Union, they say that Xcode 8 will run on both El Capitan and Sierra. (And support Swift 3 and 2.3)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sudo1996

BaltimoreMediaBlog

Suspended
Jul 30, 2015
1,191
2,073
DC / Baltimore / Northeast
I find it ironic that Apple has discontinued it seems the Macs it has had the most problems getting Bluetooth problems fixed on El Capitan. A late 2009 Mac Pro should be able to run Sierra easy, but it suffers from many of the bugs that Apple has never fixed in El Captian. So instead of fixing the problems, they've just given up instead. Bad decision. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flash SWT

grahamperrin

macrumors 601
Jun 8, 2007
4,942
648
Mac Pro

… Mac ProTo determine your Mac's model year, …

If a fully maxxed out Mac Pro from the 2009 can't run Sierra …

In netkas.org forums: discussion of macOS Sierra running on a 2009 Mac Pro 4,1 (MacPro4,1) with superior firmware. Credit to @SteveJobzniak for drawing attention.

About EFI and SMC firmware updates for Intel-based Mac computers - Apple Support

Discussions:
 
Last edited:

saxofunk

macrumors regular
Jul 19, 2006
131
32
Denver, CO
I'm more concerned about being able to continue to update Logic X on my 2009 Mac Pro. I have a hefty investment in audio interfaces that I can't afford to upgrade to a new Mac Pro AND $2k-5k worth of interface upgrades. Honestly not sure what I'm going to do.
 

macsba

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2015
660
670
Next to my Mac.
Okay.

I've read through most of the posts, but I couldn't find the true reason for the requires specs.

Is it:
a) Bluetooth LE (i.e. v 4.0)
b) AirDrop capability
c) Wifi specs
d) ...?

Thus
- what is the difference between Mac Pro 2009 and 2010?
- what is the difference between MacBook 2009 and Mac mini 2009
- ...?
I don't think it's the Bluetooth LE as my Mac Pro 2012 runs Sierra okay without it.
 

kwikdeth

macrumors 65816
Feb 25, 2003
1,145
1,722
Tempe, AZ
With the iPhone sales slowing down, Apple is really greedy to force existing users to upgrade.

Fixed that for ya.

Why are so many people complaining about 6 (or 7) year old Macs not running macOS Sierra? That's 6 YEARS!?!

Because there is no sound technical justification for it. It would be like if you could suddenly no longer be licensed to run your 2009 Cadillac simply because they don't stock parts for it anymore.

Honestly, in my mind, if they wanted to make a reasonable tech cutoff, they should have just said it requires a machine with DDR3. That would have been a far more fair and reasonable cutoff in my mind.
[doublepost=1465943390][/doublepost]
I'm more concerned about being able to continue to update Logic X on my 2009 Mac Pro. I have a hefty investment in audio interfaces that I can't afford to upgrade to a new Mac Pro AND $2k-5k worth of interface upgrades. Honestly not sure what I'm going to do.
Just stay at what OS you're on now. I got screwed over when Mavericks changed PCI addressing and my audio dsp cards stopped working with anything newer, so that machine has been stuck ever since. Pretty much every audio company out there *except* Apple (and to be Frank, eMagic was pretty bad about it too so the blame isn't entirely on apple) is pretty good about maintaining support for older OSes. Heck my 15+ year old FireWire interface by MOTU still has driver support in el cap.

You'll be fine for now though. I'd say you probably got 2-3 years active updates.
 

iriejedi

macrumors 6502a
Oct 4, 2000
821
120
Nor Cal
Dear Apple - please release a MacPro computer worth buying.... or at least slap lipstick on that pig and call it a 2016 Mac Pro.... who buys 3 year old tech? Got to be some marketing dude wondering how to boost sales....
 
  • Like
Reactions: sudo1996

BaltimoreMediaBlog

Suspended
Jul 30, 2015
1,191
2,073
DC / Baltimore / Northeast
Dear Apple - please release a MacPro computer worth buying.... or at least slap lipstick on that pig and call it a 2016 Mac Pro.... who buys 3 year old tech? Got to be some marketing dude wondering how to boost sales....

It's that awkward moment when except for Sierra now, you can do more on your 2009 Mac Pro than you can on your 2016 Mac Pro or other supported Macs. I might be speed limited, but at 3Ghz, I hardly think I'm obsolete or that a new Mac Mini or Macbook is faster. I don't even think most iMacs supported are faster, have more memory support or more storage capacity!

They joked that the new iMac looks like a trash can, and while I wouldn't say that, it certainly is not selling like the larger Mac Pros did. In my opinion a smaller Mac Pro was a great idea, but "iPhoning" it was a mistake. Pro users do not buy machines that are not upgradeable or expandable. It's that simple. If Apple sold the same thing as a Pro-sumer type desktop, they'd probably have a market. REAL Pro users are probably looking elsewhere sadly. :-(
 
Last edited:

Logger225

macrumors newbie
Jun 14, 2016
5
1
The first OS my early 2008 MacBook Pro won't be able to run. Maybe Apple will release a new MacBook Pro with Sierra... maybe...?

Yep , was hopping for a June announcement myself. My current MacBook Pro is a tad ancient and requires updating somewhat urgently, and the current one is not worth me buying? I hope they release an update soon. Might have to consider a move to the dark side otherwise???
 

ProjectManager101

Suspended
Jul 12, 2015
458
722
Apple did it to sell more new machines. The new OS is just what ever. Is not like when switching from OS9 to X. No reason to ditch anything except for proffit.
 

macsba

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2015
660
670
Next to my Mac.
Well, I got experimental.

I cloned the SSD that has the Sierra OS installed on it onto a SDXC flash drive while booted in El Capitan on my Mac Pro using CCC. I then booted the flash drive on my iMac. God, no problems. For now, I don't want Sierra installed on the main hard drive of my iMac. it works fine.

This is getting so fun. Hey, I like the new Messages features.

Yes, hopefully someone will find a way for the "gray/grey" Macs to run Sierra.

A side note here: I'm not a developer nor public beta tester so don't have official access to the developer website downloads. Some developer made it available to the outside users via the black Internet.
 

R3k

macrumors 68000
Sep 7, 2011
1,509
1,481
Sep 7, 2011
I'm more concerned about being able to continue to update Logic X on my 2009 Mac Pro. I have a hefty investment in audio interfaces that I can't afford to upgrade to a new Mac Pro AND $2k-5k worth of interface upgrades. Honestly not sure what I'm going to do.

I think you'll be fine using Logic with El Capitan for quite a few years, I think it will be quite a while before Logic requires this OS to upgrade, perhaps not even before Logic XI, if there ever will be a Logic XI that is.

Not to worry.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.