Don't get your hopes too high on this one since Filezilla isn't based on the native OSX UI and the framework it uses (GTK) needs to be adapted first.
Yeah - I was only asking because it's on the list on the front page of this thread.
Don't get your hopes too high on this one since Filezilla isn't based on the native OSX UI and the framework it uses (GTK) needs to be adapted first.
Yeah - I was only asking because it's on the list on the front page of this thread.
Wunderlist is working on a retina version : https://twitter.com/6Wunderkinder/status/222602401465630721
NONE of this talk whatsoever answers ANY of my questions about Lightroom -- mainly I am concerned with the image quality...
Does it render images using the full 2880x1800 pixel resolution of the display, or does it render them based on a 1440x900 display, using pixel-doubling to make it fit on a 2880x1800 pixel screen??
This is what the current iterations of Photoshop do, both CS5 and CS6, the images use pixel-doubling when displayed in Photoshop, looking very pixellated on the Retina display. The image display does not take full advantage of the micro-sharp pixel density of the retina display, and only renders images based on display at a 1440x900 resolution. There is no way in Photoshop to see a true "Retina enhanced" image.
The text in Adobe Dreamweaver is the same way, pixellated, like it is in Microsoft Word. These apps haven't been Retina-enhanced either. They take the 2880x1800 display and simulate a 1440x900 pixel projection on this display...taking FOUR pixels of the Retina display and turning them into ONE pixel, so the pixel size is much larger, giving the blocky pixel effect.
So -- my real question about Lightoom 4 (current version) -- is, DOES it display high resolution images in extreme detail on the Retina display, with no visible pixellation to the images? If you opened the same image in OS X Preview App, and then looked at it in Lightroom, would they look the same? What about Aperture (which DOES take full advantage of the Retina display) --is there a notable difference in image quality between Aperture and Lightroom 4?
I would love to go ahead and buy Lightroom 4, but I only want to do so if I know for certain that it's going to look good, and be a pleasure to work with on the Retina display. That's the whole reason I'm holding out on buying Adobe CS6 -- I'm not doing it until it's Retina-enhanced, it's not worth looking at, and working with crap.
Hopefully someone can answer my Lightroom questions.
So, we are adding websites to this list?
Hehe the real adventure is using the official twitter app on a retina mac
Downloaded tweetbot and I like it already!
I noticed that Outlook 2011 works and looks great on Retina, despite the other Office applications definitely aren't looking good.
Am I crazy, or is Google Chrome beta not entirely updated for retina like everyone says it is? I am running beta version 21.0.1180.41. Texts, the omnibox, etc. looks great, but the toolbar at the top is still blurry. I swear the first time I booted it up it was clear, and ever since the toolbar hasn't been.... Obviously Chrome is still totally usable. Anyone else having this issue?
View attachment 348106
PS sorry it's such a bad image, I just used Grab quickly. But if you click on it you can see that the text/omnibox is retina compatible, while the forward/backward/refresh/and home buttons are not