Diode
macrumors 68020
<snip image>
For those who were concerned![]()
That's the wired keyboard. The wireless version has no numerical keys.
On another note is the store being hosted by the old imacs?
<snip image>
For those who were concerned![]()
New mini specs - 1GB standard on both models. 80GB and 120GB.
Om my hernia. The new wireless keyboards are drop dead gorgeous.
www.apple.com/keyboard
Why no numpad Apple?!?!?!
That's the wired keyboard. The wireless version has no numerical keys.
Where do you check that?
This is the wired version. Wireless has no numerical pad.![]()
For those who were concerned![]()
CD 1.83GHz --> C2D 2.0GHz
Have we really given up so easily? Why are we not advocates for the growth of Mac gaming? Would it not be healthier for the strength of the Mac platform to insist on rectifying the situation? Apple has chosen to not provide an xMac - does that mean we as consumers should shut up? Shouldn't we at least see what can be done within existing constraints?Since when did gamers look to Macs?
The iMac's video card is inadequate for MSWindows gaming. On the other hand, the video card is overkill for non-graphics programming, web browsing, and other business office oriented stuff. I already have a display that I like. I love OSX, but I'm not paying $1200 when I can get something that fits the bill at a little over half the price.Why do so many people care about mac mini? It always seemed kinda dumb to me.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm checking out the iWork '08 videos online and it looks really good! I'm really digging Numbers.
It's always been time for gamers to look elsewhere. Why on earth would you want to play games on a MacWhat few there are actually available!
PC or console for gaming. Choose the correct tool for the job![]()
Calm down folks, it's only a computer.
Yeah, I was glad to see them go to C2D, so now they have 64-bit capable across the line. The new mini's are packed with the guts of essentially the previous rev of MacBooks (Nov '06) which is what I am on now, and am very happy with. I think this brings them back up to being a pretty decent competitor in $600-800 range.That was my last remaining concern: that they might not have done C2D. Great news! I shall treat myself soon methinks, I know they're not blazingly fast in comparison to the bigger models, but compared to the 1.33 G4 12" Powerbook I have right now (my only Mac so far) it'll probably be like lightning hehe
I agree, that price point has to be there - and to be honest I'm amazed that they've kept it, considering some of their other choices (portable non-crap graphics start at $2000, real expandability starts at $2200).I love OSX, but I'm not paying $1200 when I can get something that fits the bill at a little over half the price.
That should be enough reasons. It probably makes business sense for Apple not to fill every product niche. But that doesn't mean it makes sense as a consumer. If the mac-mini isn't reasonably price competitive, then that means Apple doesn't get my business.
If you haven't found a reason yet, you never will.