Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually I was wrong before, Logic 9 already had lossy compressed caf. Those files were air in Logic 8. So probably the exact same files.

The retail version of Logic 9 had all the loops in Apple Lossless, I just checked my install.

Going to a lossy format on the downloadable version is a big step backwards, and from my calculations (after you remove the massive STP loops that aren't even included) only save about 6 GB.

This is just GaragebandPro. Apple have shafted the pro market. There's no way I'll be able to do techno tunes on this and I've worked in the techno trade for over 30 years.

No it's the same version of Logic 9 that many people have been using for quite some time, just a lot cheaper cheaper and with a few other caveats.

  • Lossy Loops by the looks of it.
  • No more STP2 (which was rubbish as a wave editor, and overlapped somewhat with Logics functionality).
  • Waveburner appears to be gone, which is a shame.
  • Mainstage can be purchased separately.
  • Compressor can be purchased separately.

*Edit, that quote above was sarcasm wasn't it? If so my reply was a bit of a waste of time.
 
This is just GaragebandPro. Apple have shafted the pro market. There's no way I'll be able to do techno tunes on this and I've worked in the techno trade for over 30 years.

There are other DAWs available for OSX. Digital Performer, Cubase, Ableton Live, Reaper, Tracktion, Reason, Metro(my fav.) and more.


You know this! :rolleyes:
 
Any reviews

I have been reading this thread since it started and everyone is just doing a back and fourth on good and bad about the change but no real responses from those who have downloaded it.
I'm very curious how this version is, I have wanted logic for a very long time, price was just kinda high, plus my drums don't have mics.Neil Peart would be mad!
I have been getting by with GB, years ago I loved GB, but I maxed it out very quickly. I have my go to songs, and keep adding more loops. At this price I can at last make the jump. Video editing us number one to me then music, and they can go hand in hand (obviously), so if this a solid product I can't wait to download it.

Not to enter the debate on 'Pro" but all I want to say is I have amazing songs made just using Garagband. "Pro" to me is not the price of a product just how good someone is with a product, be it logic or GarageBand. Never have I said I was a pro making music with GarageBand, though my songs never received complaints on my video edits I sold to customers.
 
Logic Pro has now been reduced to the price that Logic Express was. I wonder if this means the end of Logic Express or if it will be kept around at a reduced price. :confused:

Why would anyone want Express if you can get the full Pro version for the same price? I'm recording/composing at home with Logic Pro and the results are better than most commercial albums for sound quality (benefit of jacking guitars and synths straight into the computer for no noise and a high quality mic for acoustic instruments and vocals. Editing is unreal and the software instruments included are pretty decent with the ability to make your own analog style synth sounds, etc. Logic Studio was worth every penny at $1200 and a steal at $500. It's simply unreal at $200. I do think they should have continued to offer the boxed version, though. Not everyone wants to download 19GB+, especially if they have a lousy connection. Given they already had a boxed version mastered, it's just plain ridiculous to discontinue it.

But I'm sure it's part of Apple's master plan to eliminate the DVD drive on their next-gen computers (a brain dead idea of Steve Jobs that they are apparently going to see through come hell or high water). Now that he's gone, they should get with the times and offer Pro equipment like Blu-Ray drives for those that need/want them so such a Mac could do everything from HD home video mastering to music burning. Wiping crap out just to wipe it out is one of Apple's "WTF" moments, IMO. I guess I'm simply more for adding features, not getting rid of them before their time.
 
Going to a lossy format on the downloadable version is a big step backwards, and from my calculations (after you remove the massive STP loops that aren't even included) only save about 6 GB.

So wait, what if you're on LP8 like me and you used a STP loop in one of your songs? If I upgrade to 9 via this new version that doesn't ahve the STP content, those songs will show a missing loop right?
 
The retail version of Logic 9 had all the loops in Apple Lossless, I just checked my install.

Are you sure all of them, including the garageband content? My disk install definitely had those in compressed .caf, same as the screenshot I posted above. I'll have to check the jam packs.

I'm very curious how this version is

Same as the previous version but with bug fixes. In short, a great app with some weaknesses (and probably still some unfixed bugs). Hard to beat for the price. This version leaves out waveburner and STP, neither of which you'd likely miss if you haven't owned the Logic package before.

So wait, what if you're on LP8 like me and you used a STP loop in one of your songs? If I upgrade to 9 via this new version that doesn't ahve the STP content, those songs will show a missing loop right?

If you're on the same machine, the loops from 8 should still be installed after upgrading. On a new machine you'd probably be missing the loop. I'd think you can copy over that content somehow (or install it from the 8 disks).
 
If you're on the same machine, the loops from 8 should still be installed after upgrading. On a new machine you'd probably be missing the loop. I'd think you can copy over that content somehow (or install it from the 8 disks).

Great - makes sense. I'd be in the latter boat as I'm thinking of going mac pro>imac sometime next year and wanted to do a clean install of logic amongst other things. Guess I won't be selling my LP8 discs.
 
Ya what the hell is up with that??

I went to grab 4 more 2TB drives and they were all $180+ from every site I looked at.

I regret not grabbing them when they could be had for around $120.

This is due to the flooding in Thailand where stepper motors are made.
 
Express was $199 and lacked some features of the Pro version.

Express lacked all those jam pack synths, Apple loops, a bunch of plug-ins, etc.

Studio came bundled with Soundtrack Pro and MainStage but it looked like those are cut from the app store version. This is not the same as the $500 box.

I just want to know what the difference is.
 
Logic Studio 9 cost me $500. That's fine. What is not fine is that those of us who paid for Logic Studio 9 are now blocked from getting updates of MainStage. I am stuck at 2.1.3 and cannot get 2.2 which includes a number of important bug fixes besides the multi-core optimization. This is COMPLETE BS. MainStage was not some freebie, it is a part of what made Logic Studio 9 worth the $500 price. I'm so angry at Apple's BS behavior. :mad:
 
hold off on MainStage v2.2 - so it's 29 bucks, 23 euros... but it's not running here.

Logic Studio 9 cost me $500. That's fine. What is not fine is that those of us who paid for Logic Studio 9 are now blocked from getting updates of MainStage. I am stuck at 2.1.3 and cannot get 2.2 which includes a number of important bug fixes besides the multi-core optimization. This is COMPLETE BS. MainStage was not some freebie, it is a part of what made Logic Studio 9 worth the $500 price. I'm so angry at Apple's BS behavior. :mad:

yeah... silly not to extend this, or issue vouchers for registered owners to use at the Mac App Store...

I've got a thread over on discussions.apple.com, in the MainStage forum, as the new version won't run here on a 64-bit clean setup...

The only thing worse than a paid update is a paid update that won't even run...
 
Express lacked all those jam pack synths, Apple loops, a bunch of plug-ins, etc.

Studio came bundled with Soundtrack Pro and MainStage but it looked like those are cut from the app store version. This is not the same as the $500 box.

I just want to know what the difference is.

Listed earlier in the thread.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4229

Some plugins, some features, much more content in Studio. This download version has all the jam packs and a fair amount of other content, much closer to the boxed version of Studio than Express.

I haven't seen mention of the impulse response and apple loop apps, are those included with Logic or is there some other way to download them?

I am stuck at 2.1.3 and cannot get 2.2 which includes a number of important bug fixes besides the multi-core optimization.

It's not that you can't get it, you have to fork over $29 for it. And frankly I don't think it's a big enough update for existing users to justify even that, especially since it includes bug fixes as well.
 
Last edited:
The retail version of Logic 9 had all the loops in Apple Lossless, I just checked my install.

To follow up on this, the GB loops were always lossy but the jam pack loops were previously Apple Lossless in the disk version but now lossy. I wonder what the deal is with the samples for EXS instruments but haven't found those yet (and those may not be in a file format where it's easy to tell).
 
Last edited:
This is in no way normal. While all hard drives will crash eventually (in the same way that all people will die) they normally should not crash within a few years. I've been a computer user for 35 years and have had machines with harddrives for about 20. We're talking something like 20-25 HD's. Some in RAID-configurations, some external etc. Off all these harddrives not one has actually died rather than been replaced due to larger storage needs. I've had one LaCie external die due to a bad controller but the drive itself was still working when removed from the housing.

Also: Optical media also dies and a I believe Apple and their App Store are likely to outlive all our existing harddrives and optical media. As long as you can download previous purchases again and again it is a bit difficult to understand why most people would need to backup their application software at all.

Yes, this is very normal, the average lifespan of a HD is 3-5 years. At best.

http://www.livedigitally.com/2005/02/digital-shoebox.html
 
And now to skewer the apologist:

I can't help but call b.s. on your posts, sorry if i'm wrong. I get the feeling I'm not though ;)

You are, don't worry, I'll explain.

I'd say the giveaways for b.s. are your pointless jabs/references to the iMac you "can't replace the damn thing - but wow that iMac is thin!! :rolleyes:" and the supposed "lost 2 hard drives in the same day, both pristinely kept".

The dimensions and design of the iMac (i.e. "thinness") is detrimental to a design that provides an accessible and easy way to replace the hard drive.

This is self evident.

First, if you view your iMac as an awful computer that only has appeal in aesthetics, why would you buy an iMac over one of the many, many other computer choices available to you for less money?

That's what we call a straw man, implying that my criticism of one aspect of the iMac negates all desirable aspects of it.

A. The design of the transmission in this car X is stupid and difficult to replace.
B. Since you hate car X so much, why did you buy one?
A. (rolls eyes)

Second, if you truly had 2 pristinely kept hard drives that both died in the same day, in separate computers, I'd be willing to bet everything I own you likely have an electrical issue in your house or workspace.

Point being: hard drives fail and there's a good reason to keep backups.

Also, the computer ran on battery, the other hard drive was in a case plugged in the wall socket.

If you lost 2 hard drives in the same day in 1 computer, then it would seem even more obvious that you have either faulty hardware in that computer or a household electrical issue.
If neither of these are the case, you have pretty awful luck my friend. Consider a visit to the witch doctor. :cool:

Yes, I realize that it was a case of spectacular bad luck, witch doctor has been notified. However when one has such bad luck, one's eyes opened. It's like a catastrophic flood is the best incentive for one to seek that flood insurance one had always thought to be a waste of money.

On my previous two computers (not including the iMac I'm dealing with now) one of them had a hard drive malfuncion (both iBooks). Of the two HD based iPods I've had (a classic and a mini) one of them (the classic) had a hard drive failure - ten days after I purchased it.

Hard drive failures happen, that's just a matter of time - what was catastrophically unlucky was to have 2 drives fail in the same period of time.

Assuming I'm wrong, and you have truly lost a lots of hdd's to be able to claim they're horribly unreliable, I would just ask this. What on earth are you doing to all these hard drives that are supposedly failing for you? Do you pick up your computers and just throw them around the room for fun every now and again? I ask because if you have 1 iMac that has had 2 hard drive failures in a year, it's probably faulty hardware in that computer, or faulty electrical wiring in your room, not faulty drives IMHO.

Well, the iMac has already been to the Apple authorized repair and nothing was wrong with it except the drive itself. I don't expect to hear any differently this time.

How I treat the iMac? It sits on a clean table, in a well ventilated room at about 22°C. It is never moved or managed physically.

Hard drives fail. So do SSDs so that's no solution, btw.

Out of the dozens of Macs and PCs I've dealt with amongst work,family and friends, I've seen maybe 4 or 5 genuinely dead HDD's in the past few years. That includes internal and external drives, and most people treat their computers like crap, particularly their laptops. I know HDD's are fragile, but seriously?

Seriously, you could treat a hard drive like a delicate lotus flower and it still would fail. They're not built to last a long time and a certain failure percentage is acceptable to the producer. There's nothing strange about that, it's part of the low low price of modern, high speed rotating platter hard drives.

Anyhow, I used to think optical was wonderful too, until you misplace the discs, they get scratched, they can't be read properly by your particular model/firmware version disc drive even though the disc is fine, you lose your serial number for the install, or the biggest pain, your software's license only allows you to install on 1-2 computers max, so when you upgrade to a new computer you're out of installs meaning either you're totally out of luck or you have to contact the company and plead for a new authorization which you may/may not get for a few days. Been there, done that, F___ that.

If you misplace the disc, it can almost always be redownloaded.
If it gets scratched the same applies.
On a Mac, I've never seen a disc rejected because of firmware, in fact I'm pretty sure that doesn't happen.
If you lose the serial number for install, that has nothing to do with optical discs. Downloaded software can and does often come with serial numbers - now what if you forget your Apple ID?
Same for software licence, it isn't something exclusive to optical media. The terms on the MAS are nice though Apple is known to screw its customers regarding licences (e.g. FCP) so I don't like to put all my eggs in the Apple basket when it comes to software licence.

So far, when it comes to backups, no form of backup has saved me more often than dropbox. I for one whole heartedly welcome lower cost, less restrictive, re-downloadable software stored on servers way more reliable than my apartment.

Dropbox is, I agree, essential and can save so much important stuff. Mostly because it is seamless, automatic and just works. It's a must have.

However it is not for backing up any vast amounts of data, often prevalent with Apple's "digital lifestyle", but Dropbox is excellent for the most crucial personal data - anything from 2-10 GBs is fine in my experience - anything bigger and things start to become too expensive and too slow for Dropbox.

So there need to be good and reliable ways to back up everything else, i.e. the 100s of GBs of data. An acceptable way is redundant hard drives, combined with the more permanent backup with optical media ROMs.

One's photos/music/video etc. is data that does not change, ever. Backing it up on a cheap, yet reliable ROM is just common sense. Having it on a HD is convenient, but it would be a folly to regard that as a failsafe backup.

It isn't, and for my stuff, my life and my memories - I don't accept anything that's going to fail just by standing there. Everything can get destroyed, but HDs are the only things that can lose data just by standing there or by being used correctly.

So that's not very reliable. Thus optical media of 50-100 GB per platter, is a pretty damn fine deal. It's cheap, its reliable, it's predictable and it's available (even for the Mac).

:cool:

----------

I really disagree with your post. Of all the several computers I've owned in my lifetime (over 10 at least), I have only had one hard drive fail on me, and that was on a Dell.

I also have had Time Machine backups that has never failed me since it was first released.

You sir, just have a string of bad luck, and that is unfortunate.

Yes that's unfortunate, no doubt, but the fact remains that I don't like to have fortune decide when or if my HD is going to die. The same applies to you and all users of HDs or SDDs. They have a certain odds of failing completely.

How would you like to have 1% chance of losing all your data? That's unacceptable risk for me. How about 0.01%? Also too much risk for me.

My data is irreplaceable. It is invaluable.

I have 10 year old+ hard drives that work fine. But some failed, and one would have to be quite naive or irresponsible to dismiss hard drive failure as a fact.

In fact if you heed my words, you'll thank me one day.

Thus I put no stock in HDs. More solid media is needed for me, and of the stuff available today, nothing beats optical (combined with Dropbox and a backup HD)

It is the "fail-safe" and it is important for that very reason.

By the way, the fact that your hard drive failed in a Dell is a nice anecdote, but I don't blame Apple for the HDs failing in Macs or iPods. HDs fail. In any computer. Sooner or later. :apple:

----------

Blame it on your internet provider not Apple.

It isn't the ISPs fault Apple isn't offering software on optical media. :rolleyes:
 
You can get 500 GB to 1 TB external drives for under $100, how is that not cheap for a little piece of mind? More than enough for all your Logic files with option downloads and a lot of space left over.

Especially considering that the price just went down $300!!!

----------

I remember paying $400 for a 400 MB hard drive! (And around $100 a meg for a stick of RAM back in '95)

I remember paying $400 for a 4GB hard drive.
 
Here's the difference between Logic Pro 9 and Logic Express.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4229
There doesn't seem to be any great price break for what you get. They just changed the name of Logic Express to Logic Pro 9 and maybe tossed in a few goodies.
I would be interested if I knew how good the MIDI side is. Particularly MIDI editing. :confused:
There are a bunch of idiots demoing Logic on YouTube.:p

???????

----------

So wait, what if you're on LP8 like me and you used a STP loop in one of your songs? If I upgrade to 9 via this new version that doesn't ahve the STP content, those songs will show a missing loop right?

You should still have the old loops.
 
Yes, this is very normal, the average lifespan of a HD is 3-5 years. At best.

http://www.livedigitally.com/2005/02/digital-shoebox.html

In what freaking universe? I've got an Amiga 3000 from 1991 that still has 100% working hard drives (two of them). In fact, out of over two dozen hard drives over the years, I've never had A SINGLE ONE go bad. EVER. 3-5 years...BS.

Obviously, hard drives can and do go bad (sometimes within a few weeks even), but to say 'at best' is just a crock.
 
In what freaking universe? I've got an Amiga 3000 from 1991 that still has 100% working hard drives (two of them). In fact, out of over two dozen hard drives over the years, I've never had A SINGLE ONE go bad. EVER. 3-5 years...BS.

Obviously, hard drives can and do go bad (sometimes within a few weeks even), but to say 'at best' is just a crock.

Good for you, and as soon as you realize what "average" means, get back to me :cool:

http://www.zdnet.com.au/tech-guide-storage-media-lifespans-120269043.htm

Hard disks consist of magnetic platters that spin at high speeds while reading or writing data. Due to the velocity, hard disks tend to suffer from physical degradation within a period of three years or so.

http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7588_102-3048661.html#3048661

If you don't use archive grade hard drives, the MTBF is about 5 years and some people reported having degradation after only three.

http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7588_102-3048701.html#3048701

...the two biggest manufacturers have their warranty periods at 3 years. Beyond that the failure curves go up to the point where it's not financially feasible to warranty them. Most drives become iffy after 5 years, but as said before by others there are mitigating factors involved.

http://forums.cnet.com/7726-7588_102-3048643.html#3048643

Here's one from a popular hard drive manufacturer's data sheet.

Reliability/Data Integrity
Contact Start-Stops 50,000
Annualized Failure Rate 0.34%
Mean Time Between Failures (hours) 750,000

http://www.data-recovery-tools.net/faq.html#faq-dlp-lifespan

...the general life span of a hard drive is approximately 5 years, but with constantly falling prices in hard drives, it is more sensible to replace your hard drives every 3 years.


----------

My main point wasn't really about harddrives at all though, but about the fact that the App Store makes backing up Applications more or less redundant...

Very good, and the same applies when one has the original CDs/DVDs/BDs of the software. Backing up applications has never been as crucial as backing up personal data - which is something I definitely can't recommend HDs for, not exclusively.

The minimum back-up rig I'd go with is a spare HD for mirroring (with e.g. SuperDuper), Dropbox for smaller personal files (such as written documents and files smaller than 10 MBs) and optical BDs for media.

The first line of defense against data loss is of course the backup HD, but the last line is the optical disk. :cool:
 
I wonder if this means 10 is coming soon, now that they added it to the app store and had such a price drop...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.