Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People who complain about the price really just don't understand just how good the HomePod is. At $349 it was a lot of money, yes. Also, 100% worth it. I bought two of them at $349, and two of them at $199. on sale. In both cases no regrets. Stereo pair is sublime. Sound quality is truly excellent.
Totally agree. In fact, it became my favorite Apple product since I bought it. And I almost regret not buying two more (I have 2 of them already). Now I’m sure if I ever find it anywhere the price will be insane.
 
  • Love
Reactions: SFjohn
Wow that’s horrible! Thanks for the reply.

It's hardly horrible, I don't even know how you'd start to set up a stereo experience with two speakers of such different quality. You can tell both speakers to output audio at once, if that helps? But not in a stereo arrangement because that wouldn't even make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SigEp265
I was so bothered by this, I wrote timcook@apple.com and got a response from a different Tim - ttwedahl@apple.com, who still signed with "Tim:"

Hi
Thanks so much for your note — and for your passion for HomePod. Rest assured that we are committed to continuing to support HomePod with software updates — and AppleCare will continue to offer service and support.

We remain excited about the HomePod product line and hope you’ll continue to be a part of it.

Best regards,
Tim
Looks like Tim Twerdahl is Apple VP Product Marketing Apple TV, HomePod, AirPods (https://www.linkedin.com/in/twerdahl)
 
Where are the years worth of people who told me:

1. Apple knows what it's doing, it wouldn't produce this product if there weren't people to buy it.
2. HomePod was a better buy than Sonos One.

Allow to me to say: I told you so.

1. Apple makes mistakes, and the original HomePod was a mistake from day one.
2. The Sonos One is $199 (often found on sale for $169), and does Apple Music and much much more, and has Alexa, instead of worthless Siri.

Even for someone "deeply in the Apple ecosystem", the HomePod is still an overpriced paper weight. The handful of uniquely Apple things it can do are not worth it. I'm am never going to take a phone call on the thing. And I don't shout across the room to perform private tasks, nor to control home accessories. That's obnoxious and impractical in the real world, especially when I wear an Apple Watch and can whisper the same command.4

I like the HomePod mini at $99 for the intercom feature. That's it.
 
I've been using one at home and another one at the office. I use it all day to listen to music while working/relaxing. As soon as I hear Apple is discontinuing them I immediately went out and bought another one so that I can have a stereo pair at home.

It's pricey but the sound quality is amazing with 0 effort of setting up (no wirings too). I will use them until they're dead or until Apple comes out with better products which I think will be awhile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and SigEp265
And since I don't use AppleTV I'd have two priceless dorky paperweights.

Don't assume you know how I feel about sound quality either. My main gripe with the HomePod was is and will always be the compatibility issues.
AirPlay 2 has nothing to do with the AppleTV -- any Apple device has it from Mac to iPhone to iPad to iPod Touch. If you don't have any Apple devices, then you definitely don't want to get a HomePod (indeed you can't even set it up without an iPad or iPhone...)
 
you are delusional :D
https://9to5mac.com/2021/03/15/farewell-homepod/
But the original HomePod is not a smart speaker. It’s a really amazing value mid-range wireless speaker that is almost unrivaled in its price range. It uses audio technology that debuted in speakers costing tens of thousands of dollars, and was previously unavailable in anything costing less than four figures. Oh, and as the icing on the cake, it’s also smart.

For $349, and later $299, you were getting a speaker that outperformed ones costing $500. It should have sold at least as well as the Sonos Play 5 – which in my view it beat. Indeed, get a stereo pair for $600, and you had something that left the Sonos 5 in the dust.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
This is such a bean counting decision. No doubt sales were low and it wasn't making the 30%+ margin a product requires to justify its place in the line up, but the people who bought it loved it, and they are the hardcore Apple fans who have a house filled with apple hardware and live happily within the apple ecosystem. It leaves these people with a bitter taste and erodes the 'halo' effect of the Apple brand, which affects other purchases. They do the same thing with the Mac Pro products which go years without refreshes. The high end market may be small, but it is the most premium product, can you imagine Mercedes treating its S Class buyers like this?

If the criteria for success was higher sales volume, they had the option of opening the walled garden (line in, Spotify, Pandora) and lowering the price. Positioning it as a high priced closed system was always going to result in a niche product.

It also means that in the future, anyone wanting a good quality speaker has no Apple option. If those people buy Sonos they will be taking a step outside the walled garden and might not look back. I have four HomePods and three HomePod minis, but I just bought a Sonos Arc soundbar because Apple doesn't sell one. It annoys me that it doesn't have native Siri, but the sound quality is fantastic.
 
@tone654

I think the problem stems from Apple seeing simple hardware sales and margins as "not enough" anymore.

The HomePod, despite fantastic hardware, seemed to be mainly seen by Apple as a conduit for their services (primarily Apple Music, thus the lockdown on options).

Honesty, if that stays as is, it's not great for me as a potential long term Apple customer.
I find their services to be mostly mediocre if I'm being honest.
 
If people are so dedicated to their own misery that they're using Android, they don't deserve to use my HomePod either.

There are other reasons people have Android devices.
Sometimes it's a work device that a person has no say about.

Must we bag on others just for being in a different ecosystem?
Maybe they are in both and/or would like the flexibility?

(I use Windows and macOS, both, daily - for instance)
 
There are other reasons people have Android devices.
Sometimes it's a work device that a person has no say about.

Must we bag on others just for being in a different ecosystem?
Maybe they are in both and/or would like the flexibility?

(I use Windows and macOS, both, daily - for instance)
I know I was being a bit flippant.

but also I do actually mean it.
 
I know I was being a bit flippant.

but also I do actually mean it.

I hear you.
I just cringe when this place goes the direction of how over zealous Tesla folks can get.

I don't like criticizing different choices because we have imperfect information on why people might be needing (or wanting) to choose what they choose.

Not all Windows or Android users are "idiots" or "lacking class", etc, etc
(I know you didn't say anything like that - just echoing some of the tone I've seen around here before)
 
1. Apple knows what it's doing, it wouldn't produce this product if there weren't people to buy it.
Apple DOES know what it’s doing. People bought it and people are still buying the ones they can find! If the HomePod caused Apple to fail as a company and liquidate assets, THEN they wouldn’t know what they’re doing. This? This was releasing the hardware when the technology was ready, then iterating that into a smaller version. What will they do with what they’ve learned? Probably make millions in the future on some new product. What’s interesting is that, as a short term product, Apple saw more company value in a smart speaker than a Mini Pro Tower or networking hardware :)

AND everyone should notice that these were found in the same passage of text
“And I don't shout across the room to perform private tasks, nor to control home accessories.”
and
“The Sonos One… has Alexa, instead of worthless Siri.”

Essentially, “I don’t use voice commands, BUT IT’S BETTER THAT SONOS HAD ONE THING THAT I DON’T USE INSTEAD OF THE OTHER THING THAT I DON’T USE!!!”
 
I just cringe when this place goes the direction of how over zealous Tesla folks can get.
Just think back to the "Apple is doomed" era, where Micheal Dell was saying Apple should close shop and return the investment to the share holders. Tesla has been in as "Tesla is doomed" era for most of its existence complete with massive stock shorting, etc. It does harden the their loyal users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
I don't like criticizing different choices because we have imperfect information on why people might be needing (or wanting) to choose what they choose.
But, this is more like criticizing someone’s choice of to purchase hexhead nuts and bolts to fasten wood together when all they have is a hammer. I’m sure they could still get it done, but, if ALL you have is a hammer, maybe focus more on the nails side of the aisle?
 
This is such a bean counting decision. No doubt sales were low and it wasn't making the 30%+ margin a product requires to justify its place in the line up, but the people who bought it loved it, and they are the hardcore Apple fans who have a house filled with apple hardware and live happily within the apple ecosystem. It leaves these people with a bitter taste and erodes the 'halo' effect of the Apple brand, which affects other purchases. They do the same thing with the Mac Pro products which go years without refreshes. The high end market may be small, but it is the most premium product, can you imagine Mercedes treating its S Class buyers like this?
The first ominous sign was when they killed Aperture. Then, when they let the Cinema Display die on the vine and started selling the fugly LG monitor instead, you knew Apple's core value as an aesthetic brand went out the window. Then, when they got reanimated and publicly admitted the slow death of the trashcan Mac Pro only after being decried by users, you knew they just didn't care about anything but the bottomline.

I still don't get how they concluded that refreshing premium products with a solid following was "too niche", but then banked on new product categories mortally codependent on proprietary services as a viable offering. I don't get their infinite lead times with existing product refreshes and innovating with a driptube, but when a first version of a product underperforms they cynically kill it off completely. "Bean counting" sums it up well. Pity Apple has come to that.
 
Last edited:
Probably not a good idea getting this now, unless it's heavily discounted. When Apple discontinue an accessory, that means the support on it might be gone soon. The original HomePod uses the A8, which is way outdated at this point. Apple probably cannot wait to drop support for it.
Sadly, Apple dropped support for this on day one.
 
What functionality do people want from a “smart speaker”. I ask the weather, the time, set a timer, play the news, set reminder, dim the lights. Siri can do that, what do people actually do with a smart speaker other than this simple stuff?
I’m there with you. It’s exhausting hearing people complain that Siri can’t do “Trivia” - I use Siri to automate / control my smart home, scheduling, messaging, calling, listening to music etc. For those things Siri is superb.
 
I’m there with you. It’s exhausting hearing people complain that Siri can’t do “Trivia” - I use Siri to automate / control my smart home, scheduling, messaging, calling, listening to music etc. For those things Siri is superb.
Even if that’s all you use Siri for, it still definitely isn’t “superb”. The amount of times I ask for a song and Siri can’t find it, or pulls up a random live or cover version instead of the original, or any other error, is unbelievable.

It also struggles with really basic things like football results, which seems like a really straightforward thing to sort. It can’t even distinguish between (American) football and soccer in requests, and always gives me “sending to your phone” instead of just telling me the info.

yeah, it can handle things like counting and transcribing messages as long as I don’t give it too many complicated words. So basically like a five-year-old child.
 
It's hardly horrible, I don't even know how you'd start to set up a stereo experience with two speakers of such different quality. You can tell both speakers to output audio at once, if that helps? But not in a stereo arrangement because that wouldn't even make sense.
I guess I was thinking surround sound but forgot it can only pair 2 Homepods.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.