Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On the german Telekom page you can read, that LTE is not working in other countrys because roaming is not supported by Apple ! (Original text: Eine Nutzung der Mobilfunk-Funktion ohne Verbindung mit dem iPhone ist jedoch im Ausland nicht möglich, weil die Roaming-Funktion vom Hersteller Apple nicht unterstützt wird.)

That's the thing many people need to get clarification on. It's not sure if Apple's speaking about purchasing or activating a device in the given country. This has absolutely nothing to do with roaming as that won't be possible for the launch at all. This is purchasing a device in one country and activating in another with same LTE bands.
 
That's the thing many people need to get clarification on. It's not sure if Apple's speaking about purchasing or activating a device in the given country. This has absolutely nothing to do with roaming as that won't be possible for the launch at all. This is purchasing a device in one country and activating in another with same LTE bands.

Exactly. The issue here is that we're working from very little concrete information. Especially as we are basing this on a paragraph from US Apple support, that could be explained away with the issue of bands:

""If you purchased one (an Apple Watch S3 GPS + Cellular) through the US Apple Online Store, it'll only work for the 4 US carriers. It wouldn't work internationally unfortunately. I'm not entirely sure what type of error it would show if you took a US Watch to Germany, but it wouldn't be compatible with Telekom"."

"it'll only work for the 4 US carriers"
-> Of course, because the are the only ones to support the Apple Watch in the US. And traditional roaming is not available.

"it wouldn't work internationally unfortunately"
-> Again, because traditional international roaming isn't supported by carriers/Apple Watch

"if you took a US Watch to Germany, but it wouldn't be compatible with Telekom"
-> So this is both explainable by the fact that there is no traditional roaming support AND the fact that a US Apple Watch doesn't have the UTMS/LTE bands that are used in Europe.

So quite frankly, I can't see how we have reached the conclusion that you can't EVER use a cellular Apple Watch 3 outside it's original country of purchase or usage (in a non-roaming situation).

This is the same as back when some iPhones couldn't operate from one region to another; you could as easily have said for those: "if you took a US iPhone to China [...] it wouldn't be compatible with China Telecom". That doesn't mean say, the same UK iPhone with region limited bands couldn't have been used in France.

I personally believe (wishfully) that this is just the same thing for the Apple Watch 3, and we have just had slight amnesia in our interoperable world of iPhones today. It's just the logical conclusion really; and yes it's annoying for those who want to move between regions, or eventually traditionally roam between them (when it's supported of course).

But I think we've just take too much poetic licence when we have made the HUGE STRIDE in logic deduction based on this one tiny paragraph.
 
The limitations are all coming out now, 1 hour battery life, no roaming. Wonder whats next?

Makes this far less desirable.

:-(

No doubt, the roaming issue will be fixed in the AppleWatch 4.


Where did you see "1 hour battery life"?
[doublepost=1505568360][/doublepost]
They've said you can switch the carrier within the software.

They also said the Watch must use the same carrier as your iPhone.
[doublepost=1505568467][/doublepost]
Only 3.5% of the US population has EVER traveled abroad.

I think it would be far more meaningful to cite the percentage of Apple customers (or Apple Watch owners) who have traveled abroad. I suspect it will be significantly higher.
 
is there any possibility to disable the cellular option?

It works like cellular on iPads—you can turn the service on or off without any long term commitment.
[doublepost=1505568734][/doublepost]
Wow. Timmy's "Bag O' Hurt" Parade is on a roll. First Face ID fails in the live demo to viral ridicule.

Face ID did NOT fail. It worked exactly as designed. The issue was that the folks who prep the stage had handled the phone a few times and inadvertently triggered the bio-lock security feature. It was an oversight of an edge case in planning the presentation, not a failure of the technology. Federighi handled it perfectly and the only people "ridiculing" this are morons.
[doublepost=1505569020][/doublepost]
O

One hour of talk time. With current tech I would think it quite unreasonable to expect a lot more in such a small form factor. It cannot replace your phone, only temporarily substitute for it. You still need your phone most of the time.

I rarely talk on my iPhone, so I have little reason to want to talk on my Watch. The real value of this feature is DATA connectivity while away from your iPhone. It will give you access to messaging, notifications, location features, etc., while running or swimming or any other activity where a phone is too fragile or cumbersome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdarlington1
Would be awesome if it could have its own phone # and work independent from an iPhone.
My teenager son would love it, he hates iPhone, but would sync to his iPad n Mac.
 
Anyone who buys an LTE Watch only gets 1 hour battery life?

1) I've yet to see the source for this.

2) I'm sure it's referring to TALK TIME, not general battery life.
[doublepost=1505570211][/doublepost]
I was going to buy the SS version in GPS only to avoid the red dot (I thought this was a fashion accessory?)

but alas this is not an option yet

I LOVE the red dot.

The only thing that annoys me is that the Black Sport Loop band shown in this photo (black with multi-color speckles) is only available as a separate $50 purchase, and cannot be selected when ordering the Watch.

9xtPUUX.jpeg

[doublepost=1505570477][/doublepost]
So basically get an Apple Watch 2 and forget the useless LTE option?

There are huge differences between the Series 2 and Series 3 other than the LTE option.
[doublepost=1505570594][/doublepost]
4 hours of LTE connectivity time.

This is the more useful spec. This means that the notion of hanging out without your iPhone only applies to relatively brief periods of time, such as when exercising. You will not be able to spend all day with just the watch without killing the battery, unless you disable LTE.
 
Correct, this is not a hardware limitation but a carrier limitation - the carrier doesn't want to be responsible for you roaming with a wearable for whatever reason.
Actually, I suspect the roaming limitation is entirely due to the eSIM and "NumberShare" technology, which of course has you sharing the same phone number on two devices provisioned on the same carrier network.

The carrier "NumberShare" feature requires "HD Voice" or VoLTE support (Verizon and AT&T have both stated this, and Bell Canada has said the Series 3 won't work in the two provinces where VoLTE isn't available). This is also the most likely reason why the Apple Watch Series 3 isn't compatible with the iPhone 5s.

"HD Voice" and VoLTE are similarly not available while roaming, so it makes sense that the Apple Watch Series 3 would therefore also not work while roaming. It's not that the carriers are deliberately limiting roaming with the Series 3, but rather that they're using leading-edge technologies that simply aren't compatible with roaming across networks in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: porotrico
Exactly. The issue here is that we're working from very little concrete information. Especially as we are basing this on a paragraph from US Apple support, that could be explained away with the issue of bands:

""If you purchased one (an Apple Watch S3 GPS + Cellular) through the US Apple Online Store, it'll only work for the 4 US carriers. It wouldn't work internationally unfortunately. I'm not entirely sure what type of error it would show if you took a US Watch to Germany, but it wouldn't be compatible with Telekom"."

"it'll only work for the 4 US carriers"
-> Of course, because the are the only ones to support the Apple Watch in the US. And traditional roaming is not available.

"it wouldn't work internationally unfortunately"
-> Again, because traditional international roaming isn't supported by carriers/Apple Watch

"if you took a US Watch to Germany, but it wouldn't be compatible with Telekom"
-> So this is both explainable by the fact that there is no traditional roaming support AND the fact that a US Apple Watch doesn't have the UTMS/LTE bands that are used in Europe.

So quite frankly, I can't see how we have reached the conclusion that you can't EVER use a cellular Apple Watch 3 outside it's original country of purchase or usage (in a non-roaming situation).

This is the same as back when some iPhones couldn't operate from one region to another; you could as easily have said for those: "if you took a US iPhone to China [...] it wouldn't be compatible with China Telecom". That doesn't mean say, the same UK iPhone with region limited bands couldn't have been used in France.

I personally believe (wishfully) that this is just the same thing for the Apple Watch 3, and we have just had slight amnesia in our interoperable world of iPhones today. It's just the logical conclusion really; and yes it's annoying for those who want to move between regions, or eventually traditionally roam between them (when it's supported of course).

But I think we've just take too much poetic licence when we have made the HUGE STRIDE in logic deduction based on this one tiny paragraph.

SO

I just spoke to Apple Support on the UK Apple website, telling them that I was buying the Apple Watch GPS+Cellular here to use on EE, but in a few months I am moving permanently to France (fake scenario). They confirmed that my Apple Watch would continue to work in France, of course, on a French contract with Orange (no roaming remember), and that at most I may have to do is do the pairing process between my iPhone and Apple Watch again.

I've attached the screenshots!

Transcript PAGE 1.png Transcript PAGE 2.png

Debunked? This must demonstrate that it's region restricted due to bands, but not to individual countries of purchase...?

What do we all think?
 
SO

I just spoke to Apple Support on the UK Apple website, telling them that I was buying the Apple Watch GPS+Cellular here to use on EE, but in a few months I am moving permanently to France (fake scenario). They confirmed that my Apple Watch would continue to work in France, of course, on a French contract with Orange (no roaming remember), and that at most I may have to do is do the pairing process between my iPhone and Apple Watch again.

I've attached the screenshots!

View attachment 718236 View attachment 718237

Debunked? This must demonstrate that it's region restricted due to bands, but not to individual countries of purchase...?

What do we all think?

I think the bands are the main thing, along with eSIM restrictions, no roaming. So as you describe, when you re-pair your new number with the Watch again it should work fine. I'm getting a version from Germany to use in the Czech Republic next year when it comes out. Thanks for digging into this, really appreciate it! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LCPepper
Actually, I suspect the roaming limitation is entirely due to the eSIM and "NumberShare" technology, which of course has you sharing the same phone number on two devices provisioned on the same carrier network.

The carrier "NumberShare" feature requires "HD Voice" or VoLTE support (Verizon and AT&T have both stated this, and Bell Canada has said the Series 3 won't work in the two provinces where VoLTE isn't available). This is also the most likely reason why the Apple Watch Series 3 isn't compatible with the iPhone 5s.

"HD Voice" and VoLTE are similarly not available while roaming, so it makes sense that the Apple Watch Series 3 would therefore also not work while roaming. It's not that the carriers are deliberately limiting roaming with the Series 3, but rather that they're using leading-edge technologies that simply aren't compatible with roaming across networks in the first place.
Right, that makes the most sense. I meant more the carriers don't want to spend the time/money/energy supporting roaming on other networks - it is technically doable just requires them to come to agreements with other carriers (probably to get the various number sharing systems to work together) and they haven't made the effort.

I actually found an article about why VoLTE roaming is not implemented yet:
https://knect365.com/5g-virtualisat...a27f-571d29129892/challenges-of-volte-roaming

It seems like all the carriers just can't agree on something.

Data Roaming does work but I guess they don't want to disable phone calls when on another network or it would ruin the experience.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jhollington
I emailed Crag Federighi and Phil Schiller (who fowarded to Eric Jue, Senior Vice-President Product Manager Apple Watch) about buying a LTE stainless steel Apple Watch in US and using it in other countries (in my case, Brazil).

They said it'll work just fine using Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity, only LTE won't work.

View attachment 718240 View attachment 718241

https://twitter.com/cfrancklin/status/909024334718603264

assuming you sent the same email to both... craig is absolutely useless (they aren't making a non-LTE SS, unless it's coming later...?), but that response from Eric Jue is great news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfrancklinbr
how do you change carriers within a single country
Makes me glad I don’t live in the Vatican, San Marino, Lichtenstein, Andorra, or Monaco.

OK, re-looking at that list, maybe the :apple: Watch isn’t that big of a deal, as living in one of those places would not make me worry about the limitations of an LTE (in name only on T-Mobile) :apple: Watch, as I’ve been to some of them, and life is pretty good there!
 
Wohoo so my first Apple Watch ordered! Says 4-5 weeks due to the band (normal Sport one is 3-4) but hopefully will be sooner than that! Thanks everyone for help with the country issue, appreciate it! :)
 
Only 3.5% of the US population has EVER traveled abroad. But we should probably blow this up into a HUGE problem because EVERYONE has to have their watch to talk when they're traveling.

We couldn't talk on our watches before 9/22 but it's IMPOSSIBLE to travel without that ability after that date. Cancel my trip.
The point is that you are paying $400 for a watch has LTE functionality, but you get an hour of battery life w/ LTE, no roaming while paying $10/mo when you could buy an iPhone SE with a better OS, battery, # of LTE bands, screen, etc. Sure, it's just a watch but that doesn't make a good excuse why Apple couldn't have made a watch with more bands and more carriers worldwide.
 
Sure, it's just a watch but that doesn't make a good excuse why Apple couldn't have made a watch with more bands and more carriers worldwide.
I think the real reason why Apple couldn't have made a watch with more bands is simply that it's pretty miraculous that they've managed to cram as much as they actually have into something the size of a watch.

Consider how long it took Apple to produce a single model of iPhone that supported all of the LTE bands worldwide. There were eight distinct models of iPhone 5s, and even the iPhone 6 series had one "North American" version and one "global" version — and those are considerably larger devices than the Apple Watch :)

I honestly think we're expecting too much here to assume that Apple could have managed to build all of the possible worldwide LTE bands into a single model of Apple Watch. Getting cellular radios to work efficiently can be a tricky thing (just look at the iPhone 4 debacle). Compromises had to be made somewhere, and creating separate models of the Apple Watch for different regions seems like a pretty reasonable compromise — especially when you consider that roaming isn't possible right now anyway, and the models are for pretty disparate regions — basically North America, China, and EU/Australia/Japan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakob Knutsen
assuming you sent the same email to both... craig is absolutely useless (they aren't making a non-LTE SS, unless it's coming later...?), but that response from Eric Jue is great news.

Exactly! I sent the same e-mail to both and that's exactly what I thought about Craig's answer :D:D
Eric, on the other hand... :cool:
 
Exactly! I sent the same e-mail to both and that's exactly what I thought about Craig's answer :D:D
Eric, on the other hand... :cool:
He also nicely confirms that it's only the cellular frequencies that constrain Apple Watch Series 3 models to only working in certain countries. In other words, the U.S. model will work in Brazil once the carriers get on board, and should therefore also presumably work fine in Canada and Puerto Rico, meaning that — as many of us suspected — the information provided by Apple Support cited in the original article isn't entirely accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfrancklinbr
Makes me glad I don’t live in the Vatican, San Marino, Lichtenstein, Andorra, or Monaco.

OK, re-looking at that list, maybe the :apple: Watch isn’t that big of a deal, as living in one of those places would not make me worry about the limitations of an LTE (in name only on T-Mobile) :apple: Watch, as I’ve been to some of them, and life is pretty good there!
For what it's worth T-mobile recently walked back their decision to limit the watch to 512kb/s - they said it will have full access to 4G bandwidth now.
 
He also nicely confirms that it's only the cellular frequencies that constrain Apple Watch Series 3 models to only working in certain countries. In other words, the U.S. model will work in Brazil once the carriers get on board, and should therefore also presumably work fine in Canada and Puerto Rico, meaning that — as many of us suspected — the information provided by Apple Support cited in the original article isn't entirely accurate.

Actually, I sent them another e-mail kind of correcting him about the frequencies.

I also asked him about how would they sell the LTE model here since there are some Brazilian regulations that prevent two equipments using the same phone number at the same time, but this one I don't think they're gonna answer. :D:D

Capturar.PNG
 
My intention was to buy the LTE watch in USA, take it to my country and wait to the Spanish carrier to support this service. Now I have a reasonable doubt... maybe this won't be possible.

I assume that real limitations are only in UMTS (aka 3G) and LTE (aka 4G) bands. I am quite sure that Cellular Apple Watch from North America will work properly everywhere in the world when connected to the iPhone via Bluetooth like it would be without any cellular connectivity.

Different story is when you want use cellular part in different countries than North American countries, let say in France (for now). Prerequisite is that you need local french service. I guess you can activate NA Apple Watch even in France, but it will be quite useless. The only band usable in France (and generally around the whole Europe) is 800 MHz. Europe uses different bands than NA uses. So, it probably will work, but I will be very limited.

If you would buy Cellular Apple Watch from any EU country, you can use it everywhere around EU. Obviously Apple has signed contracts with only few carries around the EU, so for now you are limited to these carries in those countries.

Problem with roaming is different. Like you can't use VoLTE in different countries, you can't roam with Apple Watch, since you have 1 phone number in two devices turned on concurrently. This is very uncommon and mobile carrier must to be prepared for this.
 
if you look at the actual webpage apple published it appears that there's several models, set up regionally to cover the LTE bands needed in that region. so the US version has the bands for Canada and Puerto Rico as well. So yes you could one in the US while on vacation from Canada.
the issue isn't the hardware but the carriers. they are requiring that the watch and phone be on the same service and they won't support roaming with the watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.