Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


According to Apple, both the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6 Plus have "faster LTE download speeds" than the iPhone 5s, reaching up to 150Mbps thanks to the inclusion of the Qualcomm MDM9625M LTE chip, which supports LTE Advanced.

A demonstration of the speed difference between the iPhone 5s and the iPhone 6 when connected to a high-quality LTE network has been conducted by iClarified, suggesting the iPhone 6 is able to reach much higher speeds than the iPhone 5s.

The test, which was conducted in London, Ontario, Canada on the Fido network, shows the iPhone 6 topping out at download speeds of 101Mbps while the iPhone 5s reaches 35Mbps. Upload speeds are similarly improved, reaching 27Mbps on the iPhone 6.

YouTube: video
According to iClarified, the tests, which were conducted using the Ookla SpeedTest.net app, were done in a spot in the city where the best reception was found.First introduced in 2013, LTE Advanced takes advantage of carrier aggregation technology, combining separate spectrums into a single faster connection to increase data speeds and network capacity. Several carriers offer the technology, and the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus are Apple's first devices to support it. Because not all carriers support LTE Advanced and due to differences in connection strength, not all users may see increased speeds on Apple's new devices.

Along with LTE Advanced, Apple's iPhone 6 and 6 Plus offer several other connectivity improvements, including support for up to 20 different LTE bands. With additional bands (7 more than the iPhone 5s), iPhone users are able to connect to more LTE networks when traveling abroad and LTE connections are available in more countries. The phones also include support for voice over LTE (VoLTE), improving voice quality and allowing some users to access voice and data simultaneously over LTE for the first time.

Article Link: LTE Speeds of iPhone 6 and iPhone 5s Compared in New Video

MacRumors,

It's fast not because of LTE-A (at least, not yet available in Canada at this moment) but because of the 20x20MHz wide available bandwidth in the LTE Band 7 (2600). Rogers, the parent of Fido, once marketed it as "LTE Max" with downlink up to 150Mbps LTE Category 4 performance.
 
ok...

If I don't get the NBN soon here in Australia, I'll get an new phone with LTE :) (maybe)

I may as well, since they both top of about the same anyway ....
 
They do something like it

The speedtest servers are close to a scam since they are everywhere and optimized more than real production servers


That's a valid point. I've been noticing many more carrier speed servers popping up. They only show up if you're on mobile data.

----------

So the news is: There is no news?



One of my friends has pulled 300 Mb/s on his 5s (see attached pic).


Over wifi maybe. It's theoretically impossible to get 300mbps over cellular data.
 
Over wifi maybe. It's theoretically impossible to get 300mbps over cellular data.

Everything is theoretically impossible until proven. Never, say never...

At once point we didn't believe these speeds were even possibly with cell phones, But now look...

I hope that i would get these speeds on my 5s

Now THAT's impossible.
 
Everything is theoretically impossible until proven. Never, say never...

At once point we didn't believe these speeds were even possibly with cell phones, But now look...

I hope that i would get these speeds on my 5s

Now THAT's impossible.


It is impossible...

The 5S has a Cat 3 LTE chipset, which maxes out around 100mbps. This was one of the reasons why Cat 4 Android devices saw better speeds over wideband XLTE over the last few months, until the iPhone 6, where the phones finally got Cat 4.
 
That's amazing LTE speed with Tmobile USA.

If someone can replicate those same speeds inside 1950s style concrete build Cold War buildings with tmobile. Let me know. That Tmobile biggest weakness inside thick old buildings

I work underground and cannot get any T-Mobile signal (AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint all have repeaters in my building, although Sprint's coverage is pretty bad). I got an iPhone 6 in part because of the WiFi calling. This negates the lack of signal in the building.
 
Over wifi maybe. It's theoretically impossible to get 300mbps over cellular data.

Nope , with carrier aggregation its possible to reach these speeds on LTE.
Even on a 5s.

He was standing right beside the carriers antenna when he did the speedtest.
 
it's useless with the super low bandwidth cap we have in north america.

I could burn through my limit in 80 seconds at these speeds (I haven't yet upgraded to their 2.5 GB per month promo). Thankfully T-Mobile doesn't charge overages. They just throttle after the cap.
 
LTE Speeds of iPhone 6 and iPhone 5s Compared in New Video

Nope , with carrier aggregation its possible to reach these speeds on LTE.

Even on a 5s.



He was standing right beside the carriers antenna when he did the speedtest.


Cat 3 devices do not support CA. Never have. Never will. Especially the 5S.

You can keep trying to justify it all you want... But it's a glitch. Nothing more.
 
PLUS Poland on 20 MHz bandwidth up to 150 Mbps on my good old iPhone 5:

10668901_741021942601952_4425122782501306736_o.jpg
 
Here in DC AT&T might mave out at like 20-25. Nice to see people actually getting advertised speeds and it's not just talk.
 
Wait a minute i have comcast 105 extreme service which can get speeds up to 105 and i get 50mbps download and 11 upload with this same test!! Your telling me a smartphone can double that? Is comcast this bad, does anyone else have these results i am getting or is it not typical?
TL;DR:
3) verify your local cable hardware is up to date and configured for 105 service
(DOCSIS 3.0/1 fully capable and aligned with your head end modem settings)
2) verify that old sub 105mpbs QoS settings from Comcast aren't in place.
1) verify the SpeedTest Server that is you are using isn't close geographically, but close net topology wise.
0) you realistically can't get more than 50mbps if your running wireless at 2.4ghz bgn mode (assuming you're not doing your comcast test hardwired with a PC), as one device that flips to b or g mode drives the speed down for all of them from 'n' to 'g' mode (54mbps). Run at 5Ghz 'a/n only' mode as your preferred wireless connection, if at all possible.

That last one is critical. 5ghz allows for less congestion/noise (sacrificing distance), and allows you to exploit n and ac bandwidth protocols more effectively. IF you are using a Apple wireless look at your connection quality in Airport Configuration and see what your getting for your devices. I set up a separate 5g (A/N only) network to isolate my remote apple TV, iPad, and MBA to get better speeds for a 35' radius of my AirportExpress/Extreme pair (hard cabled together so I'm not doing wireless extending). I've got a couple 'b/g' devices, so I keep the 2.4ghz running, and it also drives about 150' into the yard.

Then, it's all about where your server is, the saturation of the links between you and it and the quality of your cable modem/router and the head end.

Not exactly the same, but I bought 25/5 service for my local FIOS, and I was getting spotty performance. Found out they mis configured my route (I was a static IP and therefore had a different outbound router because that eliminated
double NAT), and when they fixed that, I got 25/5.

Then they automatically upgraded me to 75/25 (was 100/50 for a month, then they eliminated that price point... and 100/100 was double 75/25, which was now lower than my original 25/5). All that said, my FIOS POP was circa 2004, and while designed for 100mbps in 'burst' mode, could only really handle 50mpbs in steady state, and actually degraded the more load I put on it. In fact, the person told me that the device I had was designed to connect apartment buildings 802.11b wireless systems that were capped at 11mbps (no one person expected more than 10mbps). The upgrade to a 2012 built device sped it right up.

Finally, my fiber provider has a local speed test server, and I still was getting weird results. I determined that my route to that was still QoSed at 25 D (I could get faster uploads than downloads). It appears they don't back up their configs or saved to Nvram, and the head end device rebooted back to 2013 settings. Once they fixed that, I'm running 68+D/22U to the local server, and 65/18 to the 2nd 'nearest' (by traceroute hops) servers.

So... if you have trace route and use something like RobTex.com to determine your AU and peer networks, you may want to see how many hops it is to your 'local' speed test server, (done by geolocation), and instead, look for one on the comcast backbone, which may be fewer hops.
 
I am pleased with the speed I've seen in day to day use of the iP6 vs. my old iP5 though I do find it humorous that my son's LG G3 routinely gets twice the download and upload (regardless of the absolute values) when we speed tests side by side on AT&T :confused:
 
Yes, 100MB download is so important on an iOS device - I'm glad the extra physical bloat could accommodate such technology.

/sarcasm
 
Well, I'll never see those speeds on AT&T. I'm seeing 12 Mbps download at best. It's really starting to bother me. I could see those speeds on prepaid yet I'm paying a premium for what?

this is what I'm paying AT&T for :)

ok, this isn't normal but I typically get 15-25Mbps down

982067068.png
 
Did a speed test on my iPhone 5 the other day on Australia's Telstra LTE and got 61.94Mbps down 40.59Mbps up.

Something doesn't seem quite right with the video.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.