Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So "rose gold" is pink. We can all agree on that, right? It's not like we call orange "yellowed red."
 
Only if you plan to show it on a TV, or fullscreen on a computer. In a web browser or iPhone app, vertical video looks just fine. I don't think she was filming this for TV. Also, I don't get why this annoys people so much, unless you demand the right to see everyone's videos in fullscreen on your laptop or something.
Vogue's fashion week coverage features vertical video.

Of course, those aren't high resolution. They aren't advertised as 4K. They don't pretend that there's enough detail to occupy 3840 rows of pixels--or even 1920 rows.
 
Casey Neistat got his hands on a 6s, and did a normal vlog with it. Nothing fantastic, scene wise...but, you get the idea still. What's amazing to me - if I didn't tell you he rigged up an external mic to a 6s, the audio/video looks identical to that of his daily videos...although he does touch up the colors a bit, so I suppose it's not a 100% fair comparison. But still.


pretty decent real world test - he is using a third party wide angel lens (Moment) and an external mic (Rode) which you kinda need if you are a serious video blogger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mconk
I'm with you on the excellent quality of the "Cinematic Video Stabilization" (Apple's term). But the iPhone 6 Plus uses OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) only for photos, not for videos. It's practically the same like the iPhone 6, video-wise, no benefit (except the larger "viewfinder" maybe).

Thanks for clarifying that.

So it's software stabilization: "Cinematic Video Stabilization" - it works very well indeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habakuk
After looking at those pictures I guess she will likely be as happy with the iPhone as with the GS6...of course your pictures have a lot more pop to them as the ones posted by the early receiver, but the butterfly was clearly shot with better lighting (and thus much less noise and way crisper) and if you check the areas with low contrast in the second picture (for example the bus on the right or that gray roof bit on the left) you see the same artifact/noise garbage as in the picture of the dog on the couch...I guess there are lots of situations where phone cameras are good enough (better a compromise in picture quality then no pic at all) and I guess that the one in the new iPhone will be among those that are at least ok...only drawback: the old one may be just a bit better suited for those situations that are not favorable to the concept of a tiny sensor...while i doubt there are that many situations where one would actualy benefit from the added mp count of the new sensor...ah well, we will see when we get our hands on them...till then, let's keep the hope up ;)

Dave both the images I posted are hugely challenging for any camera. The first is basically right up against a butterfly with a lot of depth of field issues. The light is good, but the macro focus and detail is fantastic. The night shot is also hugely challenging but in a different way. Yes, there are artefacts as low light, but the camera easily manages depth of field issues. And remember those images are on tvs so all moving, yet it's very vibrant without having over-saturation.

As you get to daylight shots of family (not that I'm going to post those online), and pots and dogs it only gets better, because those are relatively easy shots that both cameras are optimized for. Yet, last two gens of iphones, it seems like there are random blurs in places where the there aren't depth of field issues, or light issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D-Dave
This is a phone, not camera. So, why all are so focused on the photo quality?? If I need good, perfect photos, I would use my camera, not my phone
Couldn't agree with you more!

Just rebutting all the hyperbolic "this phone camera is as good as an SLR" talk that inevitably goes around.
 
Those camera shots actually look pretty terrible... hope there was just something going on with them? Very grainy with little detail.
 
Hope I can upload to YouTube in 4K directly from camera roll. Right now there is only SD & HD generic options. Does not specify level of HD when uploading.
 
I'll say it...the full res pics she took of her dog look like crap. No definition on the fur at all.
 
Meanwhile, I ordered on Sept 12th and had an "Available to ship: 2-3 weeks, Delivers: 30 Sep, 2015 - 06 Oct, 2015 by Standard Shipping." Now, I get "Delivers: 07 Oct, 2015 - 13 Oct, 2015 by Standard Shipping" which will push the delivery date outside of 3 weeks. Is this normal?


I can't say I seen this before, that's odd! I ordered mines thru T-Mobile on the same day and mines say "9-23/9-25. What carrier you have?
 
The a9 is based off arms a72 instruction set and that is where the performance gains are coming from.

The edge and note 5 are using older arm a52 architecture that was out in the gs6.

The next gen arm a72 cores will also get these performance gains and a leaked exynos m1 that is going in the gs7 hit 2400 single core and 7600 muli score in geekbench
please stop talking about things you know nothing about...

you are confusing an instruction set with an actual implementation.

32-bit ARM cores use the ARMv7-A instruction set
64-bit ARM cores use the ARMv8-A instruction set

Instruction sets are simply the set of instructions that need to be implemented by those who build ARM CPUs. The way they're implemented is completely up to the company doing the implementation. In the smartphone world, the primary ARM architectural licensees (companies that build their own cores) are Qualcomm, Apple, Nvidia, and possibly Samsung if rumors are to be believed. The rest of the companies (MediaTek, Huawei, etc) are core licensees and use the designs provided by ARM (Cortex-A72, A57, A53, etc). Even current Samsung and Qualcomm flagship chips are using the ARM designs because Apple caught everybody off guard when they were the first to implement 64-bit ARMv8-A cores.

The ARM Cortex-A72 core is an implementation of the ARMv8-A instruction set. It is largely an evolution and expansion of the ARM Cortex-A57 core, which is the 64-bit version of the A15 core.

Apple's A-series of chips have used custom CPU cores since A6 and are completely different in implementation from the A72 and A57 cores that other companies are using. Nobody besides Apple will get the performance gains of their new A9 chip. That said, I'd be very impressed if the Exynos M1 leaks are real.
 
So "rose gold" is pink. We can all agree on that, right? It's not like we call orange "yellowed red."

pure gold is too soft to use for jewelry and the like. So, it's alloyed with other metals: silver, copper, palladium, rhodium, etc. The various colored golds have
18K Red gold: 75% gold, 25% copper

18K Rose gold: 75% gold, 22.25% copper, 2.75% silver

18K Pink gold: 75% gold, 20% copper, 5% silver[3]


so, you've got a standardized alloy that you can attempt to match with anodized aluminum.
 
Is this becoming common? Did anyone else get it early? My brothers sister in law got hers today too.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 171
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.