We are hopefully going to be to play most of the 64 bit games on steam but not the most graphicsl intensive titles but that has never been the case so we are really missing out.
The GeForce 1050ti was released on October 2016, so actually a four year old design (Radeon rx560 was May 2017). Although good for integrated graphics, as you say some way behind the latest console and PC performance and you can’t even expand the internal storage, something the PS5 allows. It does make the Mac mini an odd buy, especially without being able to use an eGPU.Well they are benchmarking against old generation AMD, ATI cards
those cards had been released at 2017
Nowadays both AMD, Nvidia play muuuch higher
amazing chipsets for a mobile phone, no doubt
Xbox Ones Series S = 4 teraflops at 300 euros (and it includes other hardware apart from the graphic card)
Xbox One Series X = 12 teraflops
Custom PC = 20 teraflops (and isn't the highest you can get with a single video card)
An interesting tie between Nvidia and Apple M1: Nvidia is in the process of acquiring ARM Inc. (whose processor instruction set architecture Apple has licensed.)Palm thought they were playing a numbers game - as long as you have the higher performance at a lower price, you're better. They were oblivious that fullscreen multitouch would be game changing.
There's nothing game changing here though. It's a simple CPU/GPU switch - the numbers are everything. Intel might be screwed - they've grown totally complacent over the past 15 years since they've had no competition. But Nvidia has always had competition - they've never had a chance to be become complacent. Also, I've never looked into Nvidia's financials, but I suspect their consumer stuff is a small part of what they do, and Apple probably isn't interested in going after Nvidia's other activities.
What about the Vega on the high end iMacs?
The GTX 1050 series was a budget card in 2016. I don’t remember it being recommended for gaming even at the time, unless budget was a serious constraint.
In all fairness, Apple are nearly always at the root of every spat. They simply don’t know how to meet other companies half way and while that’s worked out, it doesn’t make it right to go blaming other companies for Apples historically poor graphics offerings.
For what thermal enveloppe ? Or what amount of Power?Well they are benchmarking against old generation AMD, ATI cards
those cards had been released at 2017
Nowadays both AMD, Nvidia play muuuch higher
amazing chipsets for a mobile phone, no doubt
Xbox Ones Series S = 4 teraflops at 300 euros (and it includes other hardware apart from the graphic card)
Xbox One Series X = 12 teraflops
Custom PC = 20 teraflops (and isn't the highest you can get with a single video card)
PS5 10.28 teraflopsFor someone who doesn’t know much about graphics cards, how far is the M1 behind the PS5? How far are we until we could have next gen graphics in an Apple TV?
For an iGPU that is fantastic, the M1 is the base model CPU w/ an iGPU from Apple. What will be interesting is to see if Apple will simply expand the capability of their high end chip or if they will also develop a dedicated GPU to pair with their high-end chips....that’s it? 1050ti is not impressive at all
Finally Macs will have good GPUs. With Nvidia's dominance and the spat between them and Apple it's been bad.
Poor guy is upset.
Well they are benchmarking against old generation AMD, ATI cards
those cards had been released at 2017
Nowadays both AMD, Nvidia play muuuch higher
amazing chipsets for a mobile phone, no doubt
Xbox Ones Series S = 4 teraflops at 300 euros (and it includes other hardware apart from the graphic card)
Xbox One Series X = 12 teraflops
Custom PC = 20 teraflops (and isn't the highest you can get with a single video card)
These models only replace the Intel model which only had 2 ports as well. They still sell the 4 port versions. My guess is next Spring we will see the 4 port versions replaced with a chip that has enough PCIe lanes to support it.And somehow can only support two USB c ports??