Xbox series X smokes it and it’s technically an AMD APU.That means you dont know the diff between an gpu that is build on the chip vs that nvdidia dedicated gpu....
Tell us what integrated gpu build into the chip can come close to M1
Xbox series X smokes it and it’s technically an AMD APU.That means you dont know the diff between an gpu that is build on the chip vs that nvdidia dedicated gpu....
Tell us what integrated gpu build into the chip can come close to M1
The GFXBench 5.0 benchmarks were tested under Apple's Metal API, and show that the M1 often performs better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 560 by a fair margin. There is not yet a Metal benchmark for the GeForce GTX 1650 for the sake of comparison.
Were you expecting the base M1 to beat high end graphics card?...that’s it? 1050ti is not impressive at all
Absolutely! And that's why consumers contemplating the purchase of a new Acura TLX need to do so within the performance context of a BMW M8 or Porsche Turbo S.
I get the feeling Nvidia aren't expecting Apple to 'just walk in' and make competitive graphics processors, and I get the feeling they might be surprised.
Also remember that these GPU's they are comparing to are over 3 years old... so I'm not really seeing why we should be so excited. It's a click-bait title with **** analysis. Sure they are decent for mobile stuff - but they in no way compare to full blown dGPU's from AMD or Nvidia.The M1 is beating the snot out of the Intel CPUs and now some GPUs. Now don't get me wrong. I recognize that these values may not be sustained and only win in the short term. I don't care because, before now, the Intel equivalents (and I mean equivalent in terms of low power chips) were simply pitiful and didn't even pretend to compete.
This is just the beginning. The M1 is the low end chip. Remember that!
Do you mean the fastest Apple Silicon available? Nothing else existsWere you expecting the base M1 to beat high end graphics card?
We have to wait for Apple’s other processors to top that.What about the Vega on the high end iMacs?
M1 Intergrated graphics 2.8 TFLOPS, PS5 ~ 11 TFLOPS, XBOX Series X 12 TFLOPS, Decent high-end GPU 20 TFLOPS, Fastest GPU 110 TFLOPSFor someone who doesn’t know much about graphics cards, how far is the M1 behind the PS5? How far are we until we could have next gen graphics in an Apple TV?
Finally Macs will have good GPUs. With Nvidia's dominance and the spat between them and Apple it's been bad.
I accept this Acura XLT as a gift, no doubt
knowing it comes from Honda is enough
I don't want BMW neither Porsche
100% this. When Apple made the switch to intel, one of the selling points was how the new chips were so powerful Rosetta emulated apps could be faster than the native on the G4. This was somewhat true, but was the blueprint Apple is going with here again. By making the graphics on like for like that much faster, they have a real winner on their hands.It looks like people are missing, that this is a massive upgrade for the Air. Instead of no games, it can now play games and play them well. And with no cooler no less. It should also be a great boost to things like Capture One and Photoshop which defer a lot of rendering to the GPU now. A strong entry level GPU will make a lot of things better and Apple writes the drivers and the API for it.
And the M1 is Apple’s ENTRY LEVEL entry chip.Well they are benchmarking against old generation AMD, ATI cards
those cards had been released at 2017
Nowadays both AMD, Nvidia play muuuch higher
amazing chipsets for a mobile phone, no doubt
Xbox Ones Series S = 4 teraflops at 300 euros (and it includes other hardware apart from the graphic card)
Xbox One Series X = 12 teraflops
Custom PC = 20 teraflops (and isn't the highest you can get with a single video card)
How little effort they were putting into designing Intel's chips for them, or?...I feel like the M1 performance so far seems incredibly impressive, but it also shows how little effort Apple was putting into Macs for the last few years.
It’ll definitely be interesting to see what the more powerful chips with better graphics can do though.
I think that really shows the industry’s inability to put high performance in a low power chip, but go off I guess?All this shows is how poor Apples machine have been in the past. Especially the mac mini.
? these two laptops always had two ports each so that was always going to be the target. You guys do complain a lot for an insanely fast fanless laptop with incredible battery life.And somehow can only support two USB c ports??