Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I never minded the the chin before, and I don't now, but the missing apple logo means all my attention is just staring at that big aluminum panel. Without it supporting some other visual element, such as speaker perforations or a logo, it becomes its own visual element, & it's not apparent why the design team thought it should be. Strange.
Apparently, if I’m not wrong, the chin is made of glass, not aluminium like the current iMac. This can be seen from one of the promo videos, in one of the scene you can see the chin is shiny and reflective.
 
I really hope they announce the replacement 27” iMac (Pro) at WWDC. Ditch the white border and chin and I will be first in line to order one.
My guess is it will keep the black bezel, but keep dreaming on no chin.
 
I just don’t get why they clipped the M1 iMac when you compare it to the Mini, which has 8 CPU and 8 GPU cores in the base model, 2 x USB A, HDMI, Ethernet - configurable to 10Gb, if you want any of those you need a dongle or to pay Apple for the power brick with the Ethernet port on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I just don’t get why they clipped the M1 iMac when you compare it to the Mini, which has 8 CPU and 8 GPU cores in the base model, 2 x USB A, HDMI, Ethernet - configurable to 10Gb, if you want any of those you need a dongle or to pay Apple for the power brick with the Ethernet port on it.
Because of design. They didn't wanted the bigger USB-A ports on the rear (which are also deeper than USB-C ports).

Design first... then look what you can fit into it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1258186 and Icaras
I just don’t get why they clipped the M1 iMac when you compare it to the Mini, which has 8 CPU and 8 GPU cores in the base model, 2 x USB A, HDMI, Ethernet - configurable to 10Gb, if you want any of those you need a dongle or to pay Apple for the power brick with the Ethernet port on it.
As @IceStormNG just mentioned, because of design. USB-A is too thick for the design.

Also, as far as I know, ethernet in the power adapter is standard and not a paid upgrade. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
 
Apparently, if I’m not wrong, the chin is made of glass, not aluminium like the current iMac. This can be seen from one of the promo videos, in one of the scene you can see the chin is shiny and reflective.
That’s not correct. The the entire iMac body is made of aluminum. The entire front of the iMac has a glass shield overlaying it.
 
missing apple logo on chin: if you forget what brand of computer you own, there is a an apple logo on the back--to refresh your memory.
573a19d0-a1ff-11eb-bfb0-481d3a89d4ba.cf.jpg
 
It’s standard on the $1,499 model, and a CTO option on the $1,299 model.
This is correct.

I pre-ordered the base model with a $30 Ethernet option which means they change the power brick out.

I also ordered it with a full sized numeric keypad keyboard and the Pro Apps Bundle (EDU) for $199!

I'd rather have the pricey Final Cut Pro & Logic Pro instead of 2 more ports and a GPU core.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ron
Nice to see a voice of reason in here.
Excellent post and a much more relevant comparison.

The M1 and ASi is great, but people need to get off Apple's jock a little.
It's nauseating.
Apple essentially made an i6 chip on their first try at laptop/desktop cpus against a company that’s been doing it for decades. That’s amazing and they deserve credit for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ron
I mean let’s have some perspective here. This is an Intel 8th gen, the 8700. Desktop chips are on 10th/11th gen now which would be a better comparison.

i7 10700

1262
Single-Core Score
7759
Multi-Core Score

i7 11700

1562
Single-Core Score
9219
Multi-Core Score


This isn’t to say the M1 isn’t competitive because it is, especially when you consider M1 is entry level and sips power. But comparisons like the article aren’t great when the previous model wasn’t refreshed for ages.
The thing is, there wasn't a ton of incentive for Apple to even upgrade beyond the 8-series. Until Rocket Lake, it's all been Kaby Lake refreshes regarding the architecture. Yeah, 10-series gained SMT, but that doesn't do anything for single core performance. Moving up to Rocket Lake, and it's not exactly a winner. It's faster sometimes, but power consumption is still relatively terrible. I think M1 might not be so great looking had Intel actually done something successful architecturally since 2016, but they really haven't. Basically, Intel made it easier for Apple to look good.
 
I don’t mind the colours on the back but I couldn’t stand looking at the the white border and chin all day. I would rather buy a Mac Mini and external display.
I have a new loaded M-1 Mini and 24" Ultrafine screen for everyday work. Looking at the thick, black plastic frame of the Ultrafine all day, I am looking forward to the beautiful, restful green aluminum chin of the new iMac ordered to use evening upstairs at home. On the other hand, I do want the embossed Apple Logo back. I suppose that is about as likely as getting the lighted apple back. (sigh)
 
As @IceStormNG just mentioned, because of design. USB-A is too thick for the design.

Also, as far as I know, ethernet in the power adapter is standard and not a paid upgrade. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

For the sake of a few mm they could’ve added it without issue, they could even have done a tapered design like that of the original MacBook Air which had USB A and an SD card slot and was only 19mm thick at its thickest with the lid closed…

As others have said the Ethernet power brick is a extra cost on the base model as is the TouchID or Lock Key keyboard - base model M1 comes with the same Magic Keyboard they’ve been shipping for at least the last 5 years
 
I'll stick with the 10 core i9 and 16GB vram 5700xt, thanks. And it runs 10.15.7 so bootcamp and egpu's are still supported, external display support isn't nerfed, and it doesn't need a translation layer to run most apps.
Likewise. Keeping my 2017 27" with 64GB until it fails.
 
I wonder whether the next iteration of Apple ARM will be (1) faster for single-thread performance, or (2) scale sideways to more cores?

I wonder if they're already at the limit of single-thread performance?

They really need to fix the SSD wear issue - there is no excuse for terabytes of I/O for just a few weeks of normal use.
I expect both: a modest increase in single-core performance (5-15%) and a much bigger improvement in multi-core with more performance-cores (40-90%).

SSD writes have already improved with MacOS 11.3 and allegedly 11.4 beta improves upon this. I made some minor changes to my workflow (moved to Edge browser with timed tab-suspension) at it fixed my SSD write issues (which were >500GB/day, and are now 50-100GB/day.)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.