Neither did a G5 Powerbook.So much for Apple’s M1 at least on PowerPC this didn’t exist.
Neither did a G5 Powerbook.So much for Apple’s M1 at least on PowerPC this didn’t exist.
As usual, buy whenever you need a new Mac or want a new Mac. There is no real reason to wait unless you believe the current models won't meet your needs.
it’s Intel that tries to get people afraid to buy M1s
This is not attacking any vulnerability in Apple Silicon (or in Intel for that matter). The researchers don't know the exact delivery method but it is targeting all macs regardless of their processors and is pretty clearly a trojan. The researchers speculate that it gets in by users doing something dumb like installing something a shady website prompts them to do. The vulnerability here is in people not in computer architecture.Any new CPU architecture and code contain a higher number of bugs so more vulnerabilities. That's why the military and security conscious organizations use mature (old as heck) systems for anything security critical.
Malwarebytes runs on M1 Macs.Does anyone know if Malwarebytes works on M1 Macs?
Very likely. Intel has a new team in charge , so things will get a lot batter soon ,in my opinion.it’s Intel that tries to get people afraid to buy M1's
It appears the new malware actually targets the Apple M1 and not the Intel Macs.it’s Intel that tries to get people afraid to buy M1s
Works great, I've been running it for a month now. If you're trying any of the newer betas you might need to re-download after you've done your update though. It runs as an Intel process though, so it's not M1 ported currently.Does anyone know if Malwarebytes works on M1 Macs?
You overgeneralized in your original comment. This is what the media does. Normally, I wouldn't bother giving a thumbs down for such a comment, even if you are wrong. But you're asking, so I'll answer with a question: Are you a media hack? I mean, hey...you overgeneralized like one, so it's a fair question.Wow, two malware threats can run natively on M1 processor.
Remind me, how many can run on Intel?
Anyway, surely this is more of an OS weakness than a processor issue, no?
EDIT: I seem to have accumulated 3 disagreements with my statement above.
I am now curious. @KeithBN @shadowbird423 and @miq how do you suggest code can be run without passing through the OS first? I accept that I can be wrong. Care to explain though?
Yes, I've heard it said that 96% of all Windows hacks, hijacks, and corruptions happen because the person is using an admin account and they responded to allow some software to run.Bottom line how is this installed? Does it require the user to download, bypass gatekeeper, provide admin credentials? Is so then its nothing interesting.
It already is.you wanna know the future?
ALL BROWSER BASED APPS. The real CPU horsepower will be in the cloud.
They already are.Our computers will be nothing more than DUMB terminals.
Oh, and there you were doing so well!So quit bashing Intel Processors for being slow.
Your M1 or M2 horsepower wont matter in the future of computing where everything powerful is in the cloud.
Yep, just what I was thinking.So basically back to the Mainframe style days.
So an article from CNN? It's more likely to be fake than not. So please explain to me why I SHOULD read it?![]()
Nearly 30,000 Macs reportedly infected with mysterious malware
Nearly 30,000 Macs worldwide have been infected with mysterious malware, according to researchers at security firm Red Canary.www.cnn.com
Anything from the Communist News Network is 100 percent fake..You overgeneralized in your original comment. This is what the media does. Normally, I wouldn't bother giving a thumbs down for such a comment, even if you are wrong. But you're asking, so I'll answer with a question: Are you a media hack? I mean, hey...you overgeneralized like one, so it's a fair question.
Yes, I've heard it said that 96% of all Windows hacks, hijacks, and corruptions happen because the person is using an admin account and they responded to allow some software to run.
It already is.
They already are.
Oh, and there you were doing so well!
Yep, just what I was thinking.
So an article from CNN? It's more likely to be fake than not. So please explain to me why I SHOULD read it?
OMG, do not tell me that you are one of those who believe that their Mac is immune.Too lazy for the sources. How are Macs getting infected? Is it a trojan? I'm really surprised by this.
Mehyou wanna know the future?
ALL BROWSER BASED APPS. The real CPU horsepower will be in the cloud.
Our computers will be nothing more than DUMB terminals.
Nothing more than fear mongering. These are just existing Mac malware/adware exploits that are being ported to run on ARM. So, what? What would you expect? All this crap comes from Windows/x86/PCs to begin with. And then MR gives is front page status? It's the same stuff that ALREADY EXISTS on other Macs and Windows PCs, for crying out loud! Click bait. Boo.
OMG, do not tell me that you are one of those who believe that their Mac is immune.
I wouldn’t call Ars Technica fake.So an article from CNN? It's more likely to be fake than not. So please explain to me why I SHOULD read it?
The news is all over the web. Like I said previously, ignorance is bliss.Anything from the Communist News Network is 100 percent fake..
There was no hack. There were users _intentionally_ downloading an installer and installing the software.I thought that Apple devices and computers were unhackable!
It appears it targets all Macs, but since it doesn't actually do anything malicious, nobody gives a rat's ____ about the Intel version.It appears the new malware actually targets the Apple M1 and not the Intel Macs.
so true, there has never ever been any malware on intel computers, like ever. Seriously?Thank you! I will not be buying anything that says M1 or M1x for at least 2 years.
Definitely appears to be a proof of concept. Just wondering why it announces itself once installed? Guess they’re measuring success by mentions of it being discovered rather than any “phone home” behavior.