Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,009
34,823


In 2022, Apple introduced the M2 chip – the second-generation custom silicon chip for the Mac. After the M1 chip revolutionized the Mac starting in November 2020, how much better really is the M2?

m1-vs-m2.jpg

Apple says that the M2 chip takes the performance per watt of the M1 even further with an 18 percent faster CPU, a 35 percent more powerful GPU, and a 40 percent faster Neural Engine. There are also other significant enhancements such as more memory bandwidth and support for up to 24GB of unified memory.

As the second major iteration of Apple silicon, it may not be clear how significant of an improvement the M2 is over the M1, especially as it sticks with a 5nm fabrication process, contrary to some rumors that suggested a bigger performance and efficiency leap would be in store. The M2 chip debuts in the 13-inch MacBook Pro and the redesigned MacBook Air, so the extent to which the M2 is better than its predecessor could be an important consideration when purchasing a new Mac. Read on to learn more about the differences between the two chips.


M1 Chip
  • Made using TSMC's 5nm process (N5)
  • 16 billion transistors
  • 4 high-performance "Firestorm" cores
  • 4 energy-efficient "Icestorm" cores
  • 3.2GHz CPU clock speed
  • CPU cores first seen in the iPhone 12 lineup's A14 Bionic chip
  • 8-core GPU
  • Support for 8GB or 16GB unified memory
  • 68.25GB/s memory bandwidth
  • Neural Engine
  • Media engine for hardware-accelerated H.264 and HEVC
  • Video decode engine
  • Video encode engine
  • Image signal processor (ISP)


M2 Chip
  • Made with TSMC's enhanced 5nm process (N5P)
  • 20 billion transistors
  • 4 high-performance "Avalanche" cores
  • 4 energy-efficient "Blizzard" cores
  • 3.49GHz CPU clock speed
  • CPU cores first seen in the iPhone 13 lineup's A15 Bionic chip
  • 10-core GPU
  • Support for 8GB, 16GB, or 24GB unified memory
  • 100GB/s memory bandwidth
  • 40 percent faster Neural Engine
  • Media engine for hardware-accelerated H.264, HEVC, ProRes, and ProRes RAW
  • Higher-bandwidth video decode engine
  • Video encode engine
  • ProRes encode and decode engine
  • "New" image signal processor (ISP)


Fabrication Process and Transistors

Like the A14 Bionic, the M1 chip is built using TSMC's first-generation 5nm fabrication process. On the other hand, the M2 uses TSMC's second-generation 5nm process like the A15 Bionic chip. The M2 adds four billion additional transistors for a total of 20 billion – 25 percent more than M1. The enhanced 5nm fabrication process is at the heart of many of M2's performance and efficiency improvements.

CPU

The M1 and M2 both have four high-performance and four energy-efficient cores, but while the M1 features "Firestorm" and "Icestorm" cores from the A14 Bionic chip, the M2 offers "Avalanche" and "Blizzard" from the A15 Bionic chip. According to Apple, this results in 18 percent greater multithreaded performance than M1.

m1-vs-m2-cpu-performance.jpg

In early Geekbench benchmarks, the ‌M2‌, which runs at 3.49GHz compared to 3.2GHz for the ‌M1‌, earned a single-core score of 1,919, which is roughly 12 percent faster than the 1,707 single-core score of the ‌M1‌ 13-inch MacBook Pro. The ‌M2‌ earned a multi-core score of 8,928, up about 20 percent from the 7,419 score of the ‌M1‌ model. This is right in line with Apple's claim that the ‌M2‌ chip is up to 18 percent faster than the ‌M1.

Both chips have high-performance cores with 192KB of L1 instruction cache and 128KB of L1 data cache. The energy-efficient cores have a 128KB L1 instruction cache, 64KB L1 data cache, and a shared 4MB L2 cache. The only difference here is that the shared L2 cache is larger on the M2 chip — 16MB instead of 12MB on the M1.

GPU

The M2 features two more GPU cores over the M1, resulting in a moderate boost in graphics performance. Apple says that the M2 has up to 25 percent higher graphics performance than M1 at the same power level, and up to 35 percent better performance at its max power. In early Geekbench Metal benchmarks, the ‌M2‌ chip scored 30,627, a notable improvement over the 21,001 score earned by the ‌M1‌.

m1-vs-m2-gpu-performance.jpg

Media Engine

Both the M1 and the M2 have dedicated video encode and decode engines for hardware-accelerated H.264 and HEVC, but the M2's video engines are also able to accelerate ProRes and ProRes RAW to enable playback of multiple streams of 4K and 8K video. In addition, the M2's media engine includes a higher-bandwidth video decoder, supporting 8K H.264 and HEVC video.

Unified Memory

The M1 and the M2 come in configurations with 8GB or 16GB of unified memory, but the M2 adds an additional, top-tier 24GB configuration. The M2's memory controller can also deliver 100GB/s of unified memory bandwidth, a substantial improvement over the M1's 68.25GB/s memory bandwidth.

Other Improvements

The M2 features improvements to several of Apple's custom silicon technologies. For example, the Neural Engine can process up to 15.8 trillion operations per second — over 40 percent more than M1. The M2 also contains Apple's latest Secure Enclave and a new image signal processor (ISP) for better image noise reduction.

Final Thoughts

Overall, the M2 chip offers moderate improvements over the M1, even if most M1 users are unlikely to notice significant improvements when upgrading to the M2. The M2's advancements are generally worthwhile, if not transformative, and the chip is certain to provide a more up-to-date experience with lower-spec Apple silicon machines – especially for those coming from an Intel-based machine.

While the M2 offers improvements across the board thanks to its enhanced 5nm process, updated cores, and additional GPU cores, the major upgrades come to users who need to work with video, as well as those who have memory-intensive workflows. The M2's higher-bandwidth video de... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: M1 vs. M2 Chip Buyer's Guide: How Much Better Really Is M2?
 
Last edited:
Its probably not worth getting too hung up year-to-year on these processors. Most people aren't going to be replacing their Macs every year like some do their phones. And even then phones have gotten so good quite a few don't even replace yearly. Right now each A series upgrade is iterative; we're past the A6 to A7 bombshells. Thus, each M upgrade will likely be iterative, not earth shattering. And that sets Apple fans up for year to year dissapointment. But when it comes time to replace my M1 iMac in 2025 or so, and I'm looking at 4 year improvement, then the M upgrade won't seem quite so iterative.
 
M2 is a decent upgrade on the low end, still 5 nm, higher clocks and more cache, upgraded cores. Nothing super major. I'm interested in seeing how or if M2 scales up to M2 Pro / Max. Also curious is Apple's strategy is first introducing new cpu and gpu cores on the iPhone then scaling them many months later to iPad and now Mac.

Apple is about to release A16 on iPhone Pro with new cores, possibly with a 3nm design, yet the iPad and Mac are getting the "older" cores from 2021.
 
Not worth spending an extra $1000+ just to
Upgrade. I honestly don’t see a big difference. Am I missing anything?
For CPU performance, probably not. For GPU, neural engine, and people working with ProRes, it sounds like it may very well be worth it. So like any hardware consideration, it depends on your specific applications/workflow.
 
M2 is a decent upgrade on the low end, still 5 nm, higher clocks and more cache, upgraded cores. Nothing super major. I'm interested in seeing how or if M2 scales up to M2 Pro / Max. Also curious is Apple's strategy is first introducing new cpu and gpu cores on the iPhone then scaling them many months later to iPad and now Mac.

Apple is about to release A16 on iPhone Pro with new cores, possibly with a 3nm design, yet the iPad and Mac are getting the "older" cores from 2021.
I’m also interested in how the M2 scales up to Pro/Max level. I’d also like to see a comparison between the base M2 and the M1 Pro.
 
I was really impressed with the M1.
This wasn't a huge leap and frankly, I'm a bit disappointed that they had to crank the clock up by 10% to get that improvement. It's a risky move, considering you can't just do that with every upgrade.

But all considered, it's not even one of those horribly lazy Intel upgrades from the days before Ryzen.
It's just a decente incremental upgrade. You don't need it if you have an M1, it's welcome for everyone else.
 
If you boosted the clock speed of the M1 CPU cores from 3.2 to 3.49 GHz I'm pretty sure 10% of the speed gains would be there on M1 too... so M2 CPU cores are 8% better. Actually it's the E cores that have more gains than the P cores really.

Most of the 20 billion extra transistors too will be gone on the additional video encoders and 2 extra GPU cores, so again a statistic that is weak. If you added 2 GPU cores to M1 it also would close the gap quite a bit on the M2 here.

M2 is a nice to have for sure and the M2 Air looks really nice. But if you have an M1 you're still in a very good place. M1 Max here and it is extremely good (and totally silent). Compared to my i9 maxed out Intel MBP it's a world apart in a good way.

M2 is still not to be sniffed at but if you've an M1 then maybe wait for M3.
 
For CPU performance, probably not. For GPU, neural engine, and people working with ProRes, it sounds like it may very well be worth it. So like any hardware consideration, it depends on your specific applications/workflow.
For those for really needed the performance improvement in one or all of those aspects, probably the better upgrade would have been last year with the M1 Pro/Max MacBook Pro.

However, the M2 improvements over M1 are very welcome for those upgrading from Intel machines or switching from Windows. Both M1 and M2 MacBook Airs are now available for sale, and there are several good reasons for some people to choose the M2 MacBook Air over the M1 model, even at higher cost.
 
Not worth spending an extra $1000+ just to
Upgrade. I honestly don’t see a big difference. Am I missing anything?
Extra $1000? The difference between the M1 Air and the M2 Air is like $200. It's not like you chuck your M1 machine in a lake when you upgrade either, you can sell it and recoup some of that expense.

This is exactly the same as when people upgrade their iPhones every year. The improvements are there, but if you have a previous model, it's probably not worth it unless there's a spec that specifically addresses a need of yours. The real value is for people coming from several generations back.
 
For all the old-timers, this isn't like G4 to G5. It's more like G3/333 to G3/500.

Actually IT IS like G4 vs. G5.

Slightly higher clocks, a bit more and faster RAM and support for various bits. Clock by clock the difference was small and in some cases the G4 was even faster then a G5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moonlight
M2 is a decent upgrade on the low end, still 5 nm, higher clocks and more cache, upgraded cores. Nothing super major. I'm interested in seeing how or if M2 scales up to M2 Pro / Max. Also curious is Apple's strategy is first introducing new cpu and gpu cores on the iPhone then scaling them many months later to iPad and now Mac.

Apple is about to release A16 on iPhone Pro with new cores, possibly with a 3nm design, yet the iPad and Mac are getting the "older" cores from 2021.
This isn't really surprising given that the iPhone is Apple's most important product, and the nature of the current tech landscape with production and shipping delays. They're going to be spending as much time as possible pumping out iPhones and they're likely not going to be able to meet demand adequately; prioritizing the M series would be foolish. Using the established production lines for your less-numerous and older chips is smart business.

More to the point, plenty of chipmakers have opted for more stable processes for their higher-margin and larger products—Intel's Xeons in the Mac Pros were always essentially built off last year's tech; if you wanted the fastest and newest product you just got an i7 or i9 instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Argoduck
TD;DR

If you have M1-vanilla, M2 is better (cpu and gpu)
If you have M1-pro/max/ultra, M2 is better for single core tasks, and M1-pro/max/ultra will be better at just about everything.

If want a Touch Bar, get the new MBP. Otherwise, get the M2 MBA in a month.
But also, if you have an M1, you can probably wait a year or two and get a more significant upgrade. M1s are still rock-solid chips.
 
Serious question.

How much does it really matter?

I don't think anyone should be planning to upgrade with every single chip revision and Apple really isn't planning to continually sell the last generation so its kind of a moot point.

If every new Apple silicon chip is even a slight improvement over the previous generation, and Apple continues to innovate with the other features that set their stuff apart from the pack, there won't be disappointing hardware, ever.

Even if Apple sold the M2 Air with exactly the same CPU as the M1 Air, its still a significantly better machine. Better speakers, better display, better webcam, magsafe, thinner bezel, faster charging, etc. Increased CPU and GPU performance are the least interesting parts of the new machine.

The real danger for Apple is that they have set the new bar for laptops and the PC industry will be quick to adapt. They can't get complacent about what is actually on the market and continually look to push their hardware farther. The big improvement in GPU performance and the much higher memory bandwidth on the new chip are encouraging signs that they want to keep the pedal to the metal while they are still ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
If you are like me and money is tight, drive your car until the thing refuses to run any more, then park it under a tree and buy another one. :cool: When I worked for various software development companies years ago (Computer Associates, IBM, BMC Software), developers rarely got new company bought computers more than once every three years or so, and they were never top of the line. For most people it just isn't cost effective, or necessary, to upgrade every year. Unless you are in a rare exception group, the M1 is sufficient for now and probably a few more years as well. Those who have unlimited budgets can spend it on whatever they want, but an M1 will be good enough for me for another few years (at least).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.