That 24 GB is weird, wonder was there a physical limitation that made it an odd 28 GB memory or something like that, that they decided not to make it that way.
That's why I stuck one of these on each side of my OWC Envoy express...Anyone who's reviewed external SSDs will know that they are for, the most part, 'thermally challenged'.
I’d like to see someone do that with a 10 year old PCI'm typing this comment on a 2012 non-retina 15-inch MacBook Pro. I use it for everything, from web browsing to full-HD video editing in Premiere Pro CS6, and even light 3d animation in Blender.
That 24 GB is weird, wonder was there a physical limitation that made it an odd 28 GB memory or something like that, that they decided not to make it that way.
Well if you put it in comparison with the last decade of Intel Core i CPUs, 20% is actually a very decent gen over gen upgrade. I don’t think it is worth replacing your outgoing model only for a slight performance bump… it never was.No way, it's not worth an upgrade. Only 20% faster with the M2. Not worth it at all.
M2 Chip should have been called M1S. Save the money and get yourself a M2 MacBook Air.
No, they keep those around to compete with the low end Android products and they're still better than that lot of junk.I don’t know why people are so shocked it’s the same design.
Apple are still selling the same designed iPad since 2013 and iPhone SE since 2014 and Apple Watch 3 since 2017. They milk the hell out of their designs.
The air will throttle much faster than the Pro does, so I don't know that it's worth the extra $100 savings to buy the air.No way, it's not worth an upgrade. Only 20% faster with the M2. Not worth it at all.
M2 Chip should have been called M1S. Save the money and get yourself a M2 MacBook Air.
At least 10% of that increase is just inflation. So I'd look at it more like $100 for inflation and $100 for improved performance. Though the reality is that it might all be driven by inflation. Not just the inflation so far, but inflation that Apple is anticipating as it keeps its price level over the next year or so. So you could say the performance upgrade is basically "free".So essentially only worth the $200 spike in price over a 2 year old model if your goal is to do heavy-duty video editing.
Otherwise, Apple pricing itself out of what was once it's most affordable real laptop, capable of doing what people wanted it for.
This offering to me seems to be to get those who are still on Intel machines to upgrade and who did not want to spend the Money on M1 Max. This includes those who like the Touch Bar also. Believe it or not, there are users who liked the Touch Bar and is why Apple still offers it, but Apple knows the users by their data...so catered that segment with this new system.For most people the upgrade is not worth it but for some use cases it will be.
Yes..The M2 Chip was probably called "M2" to get people to buy (or upgrade). Marketing knows what to do for Apple Fans to consider spending..No way, it's not worth an upgrade. Only 20% faster with the M2. Not worth it at all.
M2 Chip should have been called M1S. Save the money and get yourself a M2 MacBook Air.
That's the problem today, people are starting to treat computers as phones, when they are not. Heck, even phones have a 2-year life expectancy.What’s your problem? People don’t change computers like phones, nobody buy a Mac and change it with the next one
Only if you bought it with 16GB of RAM.ARTICLE SUMMARY: NO
For only a 20 percent bump and speed... Why upgrade? If you already have an M1 device, save your money.
Your M1 will last you 10 years+. Don't believe the Apple marketing crap.
Apple has form on this; it kept the 2012 MBPro on the books til 2016, because there were people who wanted the ports/optical drive.This offering to me seems to be to get those who are still on Intel machines to upgrade and who did not want to spend the Money on M1 Max. This includes those who like the Touch Bar also. Believe it or not, there are users who liked the Touch Bar and is why Apple still offers it, but Apple knows the users by their data...so catered that segment with this new system.
I am in the category who liked the Touch Bar, but needed the power of M1 Max for video editing (spent my funds on 16" MacBook Pro) so would not even consider this at this time. This M2 Mac book Pro is not for us who have M1 Pro or Max.
6, 12 and 24 GB would seem reasonable.The 24GB of RAM is an annoying number. It should be in 2’s: 8,16, and 32
If you own any Intel 13” MBP 2020, don’t need Intel compatibility and don’t own an M1, you should buy either the M2 MacBook Pro or the M2 Air when it’s released. It’s a harder call for those with a 15” or 16” MBP that is happy with its speed and screen size.
'Anticipated inflation' is an interesting rationale for hiking prices.At least 10% of that increase is just inflation. So I'd look at it more like $100 for inflation and $100 for improved performance. Though the reality is that it might all be driven by inflation. Not just the inflation so far, but inflation that Apple is anticipating as it keeps its price level over the next year or so. So you could say the performance upgrade is basically "free"...