How so?The clear segmentation is between MacBook Air and MacBook Pro. But turns out Pro alone isn't enough for more displays, has to be certain configurations of it.
How so?The clear segmentation is between MacBook Air and MacBook Pro. But turns out Pro alone isn't enough for more displays, has to be certain configurations of it.
No, it's not for me to settle, it's for me to chose the correct product for the correct job based on my needs. That's why I always state to do your research before buying any product and not buy for what it can be, but for what it is."Don't come back to complain". Again, you can be happy to settle for what Apple offers you. That's your prerogative. Just understand that as long as Apple's customers continue to live with Apple's "market segmentation" as you call it (really, it's just a businessy-sounding weasel-word for "artificial limitation intended to increase upsell potential") and not question or complain about basic features missing in a mid-range-priced laptop, you will continue to face the compromises Apple builds into their products.
If you are paying >$500 extra to get an "upgraded" machine, just because a single feature is missing from the cheaper model that happens to do everything else you need, rather than buying from some other manufacturer, then you are absolutely settling for what Apple chooses to give you.No, it's not for me to settle, it's for me to chose the correct product for the correct job based on my needs. That's why I always state to do your research before buying any product and not buy for what it can be, but for what it is.
Which is why I do that if it comes to it. I have no qualms of using a Windows machine, I do so for work. Furthermore, I have been lucky enough to find what Apple offers at my time of upgrades to correctly fit my needs without buying upwards unnecessarily.If you are paying >$500 extra to get an "upgraded" machine, just because a single feature is missing from the cheaper model that happens to do everything else you need, rather than buying from some other manufacturer, then you are absolutely settling for what Apple chooses to give you.
The base MacBook Pro can only run 1 external display. You need the M1 or M2 Pro or Max to drive more.How so?
True, the base MBP is there as a bridge.The base MacBook Pro can only run 1 external display. You need the M1 or M2 Pro or Max to drive more.
Not to the standards of Apple or most customers.Do what poorly, run a second display? Even having to rely on DisplayLink, my mini runs 3 without issues.
Why, does your DisplayLink adaptor not work well?Not to the standards of Apple or most customers.
Sounds like regardless of whichever manufacturer we go with, we are ultimately "settling" for one set of compromises over another.If you are paying >$500 extra to get an "upgraded" machine, just because a single feature is missing from the cheaper model that happens to do everything else you need, rather than buying from some other manufacturer, then you are absolutely settling for what Apple chooses to give you.
It doesn't work "well" for anyone.Why, does your DisplayLink adaptor not work well?
I don't say this often, but I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about here.It doesn't work "well" for anyone.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. People think display link "works" because the monitor turns on and shows a picture.I don't say this often, but I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about here.
"Does exactly what the manufacturer intends, and exactly what the user expects" sounds like a pretty solid definition of "works" to me. YMMV I suppose.I know exactly what I'm talking about. People think display link "works" because the monitor turns on and shows a picture.
Who knows if I'm even replying to the right comment now? It's on my DisplayLink'd screen. Better move it to the other one to make sure I'm not being deceived... yep it looks exactly the same."Does exactly what the manufacturer intends, and exactly what the user expects" sounds like a pretty solid definition of "works" to me. YMMV I suppose.
And you've tested a DisplayLink adaptor and found that it doesn't work properly? This is what I'm saying, you're making stuff up.I know exactly what I'm talking about. People think display link "works" because the monitor turns on and shows a picture.
DisplayLink is a hack and the results show. The fact that it's "good enough" for some people is not factor in any argument.And you've tested a DisplayLink adaptor and found that it doesn't work properly? This is what I'm saying, you're making stuff up.
By the way, my office MBP doesn't display a picture on their USB-C monitors, and with any dual-DisplayPort dongle the Mac KP's, so instead I have to use two separate dongles. Turns out the particular GPU it has doesn't play nicely with those monitors for whatever reason. No DisplayLink involved. That's not a high bar.
HiDPI resolutions are arbitrarily being removed by Apple. My M1 Air is driving my 34" 5K LG ultrawide just fine at native 5880x2160, I just a lower HiDPI resolution of say, 1979px vertical so I get smoothing, everything isn't so tiny, I can use Mac's zoom function to get a closer look at things (never realized how much i use this) with images staying high res, and my designs render properly and smoothly in InDesign and Illustrator.Is the limitation about monitor count or about the number of pixels the M2 can drive?
Could you, for example drive 2 external monitors at 1080p instead of 1 external at 4k-6k?
I love what I hear about Apple’s M processors but I guess I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around only supporting one external display since I’ve been doing multiple monitors since like windows 98 and Mac OS 8.x
They should have given the option of upgrading it to the M1 Pro chip as a secondary CPU option.More proof that they should just axe the 13-inch M2 MacBook Pro.
That would be nice, but that would be a different model altogether. SOC changes everything.They should have given the option of upgrading it to the M1 Pro chip as a secondary CPU option.