I look forward to watching movies at a much faster rate than on current iPads.Can't wait for this chip to get to the iPad Pro. Imagine how much faster browsing the web while on the toilet would be. Amazing.
I look forward to watching movies at a much faster rate than on current iPads.Can't wait for this chip to get to the iPad Pro. Imagine how much faster browsing the web while on the toilet would be. Amazing.
Looks like I won't give my son a choice for his Uni laptop.Now we're talking! Breaking the 2000 barrier for single core.
The OP states that the model identifier was Mac14,6… now the Mac Studio is Mac13,1&2 and the 2022 13-inch MacBook Pro M2 is Mac14,7 (yes, odd… vs the 2021 MBP 13-inch being MacBookPro17,1 and the 14/16-inch M1 Pros being MacBookPro18,1–4). I'm guessing this could be the M2 Mac mini (M1 min is Macmini9,1) or a 13-inch MBP variant (they'd be an easy chassis to test on, plenty of room in there for a socketing CPU, decent cooling overhead).These results could be from a difference in enclosures. Say for the first set of scores. Could be a Mac Mini or a Mac Studio. Even a "lower" end MB Pro. The higher scores could be for a higher end version on the desktop. Allowing for the increase in clock speed.
Or, they are maybe allowing for a speed spec difference between families. So you could get a Pro or a Max at different clocks as purchasing options.
The 96gb of memory makes me think this could be an M2Max variant for the updated Mac Studio… unless Apple has increased the memory limit for the MacBook Pro.
It’s not, and I seriously wish people would stop pushing that narrative.If this is the 3nm, then it will be worth the wait for M2 Pro !!!
The graphics scores are where the m2 pro and max will shine. Like with the m1 vs m2 we should see a 35% faster gpu so we should be looking around 56,000 for the m2 pro and 87,000 for m2 max.
Compered to 42,000 and 65,000
The increased came from both memory bandwidth and extra cores. Both are important for that high increaseThe increased GPU performance of M2 was mostly due to the large increased memory bandwidth from 68GB/s for M1 to 100GB/s for M2.
Yes but mostly from the memory bandwidth. You don't get 35% more performance with only two more cores. For example in Shadow of the Tomb Raider you get only 9% higher fps with M1 Pro 16c than with 14c.The increased came from both memory bandwidth and extra cores. Both are important for that high increase
I'd like to know when we'll see a M2MBP? If not spring-ish then I will go ahead and get M1.
The biggest quality-of-life improvement in the new laptops won't be compute power at max, it'll be support for WiFi 6E.
We'll definitely see one in Spring before WWDC. If they're already posting Geek Bench scores though I get the feeling a release is soon (Q1 2023), especially since it's reporting MacOS version 13.2.
Traditionally MacOS x.2 versions come out by late January, early February. Apple has often introduced new MacBook Pros in late February, early March. I'll be surprised if they aren't out by then.
when i said that you gain 35% just from the extra cores? i just said both are important for that gain, read again pleaseYes but mostly from the memory bandwidth. You don't get 35% more performance with only two more cores. For example in Shadow of the Tomb Raider you get only 9% higher fps with M1 Pro 16c than with 14c.
you can bet these new Macbook pro will come in spring, probably April or May, maybe even soonerActually apart from MBA Apple has never released a MBP earlier than in May according to MR Buyer's guide. Not saying they couldn't/wouldn't since the new chips seems to be ready.![]()
Do you know if he has the M2 with 10 gpu cores somewhere in there ? Too bad he didnt add the M2 to the comparison after its releaseYes but mostly from the memory bandwidth. You don't get 35% more performance with only two more cores. For example in Shadow of the Tomb Raider you get only 9% higher fps with M1 Pro 16c than with 14c.
Cool that the performance is higher, but will this be the end of the noiseless and cool experience which people have had with the M1?
The graphics scores are where the m2 pro and max will shine. Like with the m1 vs m2 we should see a 35% faster gpu so we should be looking around 56,000 for the m2 pro and 87,000 for m2 max.
Compered to 42,000 and 65,000
when i said that you gain 35% just from the extra cores? i just said both are important for that gain, read again please
You can clearly see how M1 8gpu cores compares with M2 8 gpu cores around 16% increase and the rest is from the extra 2 cores, so its almost 50-50
It is still slow with M1 Ultraon 10 years old devices , of course
Aren't the reviews of the m2 stating it has worse thermal performance tho?Yes, the word "performance" refers to many things. The sheer execution performance (how fast is it?) is just one metric. How much power it consumes while achieving that first metric is thermal performance. The M2 may not deliver massive leaps in execution performance, but it delivers it in a more efficient thermal package, therefore better battery life. Heat is a waste of energy. Less heat = longer battery life.
Do you know if he has the M2 with 10 gpu cores somewhere in there ? Too bad he didnt add the M2 to the comparison after its release
In real world usage i notice that Safari takes at least 2 seconds slower to display the websites I visit compared to Firefox.Safari has gotten at least 30% faster in the las 12 months. I remember speedometer was at 276 points last year and now it's at 375 points on the same machine.
The m2 is over 400 points but im guess it could be going towards 450 points with the new scores on the m2 pro/max