Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
experience isn't a good indicator? am much more concerned with how things perform (apps, the OS) then what's happening under the hood. millions of macusers have never opened activity monitor; they just work, surf, whatever... and enjoy using their macs.
That’s true, but the reason that getting enough RAM is important is that swap uses SSD cycles and shortens the drive’s life.
 
That’s true, but the reason that getting enough RAM is important is that swap uses SSD cycles and shortens the drive’s life.
by how much?

i guess a lot depends on what kind of life span one expects of a mac. i kept my 12" macbook for 6 years (i generally get new macs every 2-3 years); the drive is still doing it's job. anyway, can you provide some details? (i know what you're saying is true, just wondering what the 'real-world' facts are).
 
i ran my life on a 2016" macbook with 8gb ram, and never felt any 'hesitations'.

having a good experience is just that; one does not have to be constantly comparing it to how 'better' it could theoretically be. and that doesn't make people 'ignorant'.

for most computer users, the reference point is simply their own experience, they're not up half the night running benchmarks on 2 macs (for example), or stressing about the things we do here on the macrumors forums...
Sure.
One thing I want to point out, is I used the word "ignorance," which is simply a condition of not knowing something. I did not say people are "ignorant," which while it can mean the same thing, it often has a different connotation, in that it can be taken as a disrespectful epithet. Connotations are highly dependent on the context and manner in which the word is used.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fisherking
Huh. Do you have a source for this?
Welcome to the debate. Only 3,479 posts to read... :)

 
  • Haha
Reactions: racoop
Granted it may be after extended use as it's on my 27" iMac which I never shut down and it has 24GB of memory. But occasionally I'll get the "this site is using too much memory" in a Facebook tab and when I check it's well over 1GB and as high as 3GB. Usually if I've been watching videos or watching a live feed.
That’s crazy! Facebook is a mess so I’m not surprised that their website has issues like this.
 
Sure.
One thing I want to point out, is I used the word "ignorance," which is simply a condition of not knowing something. I did not say people are "ignorant," which while it can mean the same thing, it often has a different connotation, in that it can be taken as a disrespectful epithet. Connotations are highly dependent on the context and manner in which the word is used.
I understand what you’re saying, I’m one of the people you’re referring to in the original post and agree with your observation 🙂.

Actually, I would adjust it slightly, at least for my particular case, in that I’m not ignorant that there are options to make the experience better, however, what’s ‘better’ is so marginal to my user experience that I don’t care. It was different 10-15 years ago when Apple was innovating with entirely new products and each new upgrade delivered completely new and incredible features.

Two years ago I upgraded my iPhone 6 to a 12 and I was soooooo excited but the reality is that I used the new one exactly as I had used the old one. The new one was frankly not that much faster. Not to mention, I waited ~six years and the battery on the 12 still didn’t last an entire day!

I’m now upgrading my 2016 MacBook (to an M2) but only because I accidentally pulled the (non-MagSafe) charger and it fell off my bed and died. I AM excited about getting the M2, but also know the feeling will dissipate within a few days because it’s going to do exactly what my last laptop did (except hopefully not fall off my bed and die - not that MagSafe is new feature either, I had a MacBook with it more than ten years ago).

I did originally order the Midnight M2, which would have given me the new fingerprint feature at least, but then I switched to Starlight so I’m not even getting the benefit of that! 😂
 
I bought the 16 gig version and I’m SO happy I did. I had one lite app open and a web browser with one tab and it was using almost 8 gigs of RAM. If I was doing heavy tasks on this I’m not even sure 16 would be enough.
 
I bought the 16 gig version and I’m SO happy I did. I had one lite app open and a web browser with one tab and it was using almost 8 gigs of RAM. If I was doing heavy tasks on this I’m not even sure 16 would be enough.
ef8.jpg

:)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Yes? I closed all apps except Pages and it's currently using 6.25GB of memory doing absolutely nothing but idling. 8 is not enough, especially if you have a 256SSD and it starts to swap. I'm not saying 8GB/256SSD makes the m2 slow, but it very easily caps out the RAM which is generally not something you want to have happen.
Well, the system will occupy memory if it can, because unused memory is wasted memory. This does not mean it *needs* to occupy this much memory. Amount of memory "used" is not necessarily a good indicator how how much memory is needed. If you close apps or documents it will cache information in case you reopen later, until the memory is needed for something else.
Better indicators are whether the memory pressure is yellow, and how much swap is being used.

That being said, I think the 16GB upgrade is worthwhile for most.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: carfo
do you at least sleep your imac? anyway, it's worth rebooting occasionally; it 'flushes' the ram˙, and a clean start can be a very-useful thing...
I've heard this before, but I have also read that rebooting to help this is an urban legend.

How does rebooting help exactly? Does that translate to rebooting AW, iP, etc?

Always wondered this, but never understood the concept.

Thanks for indulging me. :)
 
I've heard this before, but I have also read that rebooting to help this is an urban legend.

How does rebooting help exactly? Does that translate to rebooting AW, iP, etc?

Always wondered this, but never understood the concept.

Thanks for indulging me. :)
you can google this, but it clears the ram (logically, since ram is active space only, not storage), and you get a clean start on reboot. also worth considering a safe boot (which clears the cache folder) if things seem buggy, or sluggish.
 
I've heard this before, but I have also read that rebooting to help this is an urban legend.

How does rebooting help exactly? Does that translate to rebooting AW, iP, etc?

Always wondered this, but never understood the concept.

Thanks for indulging me. :)
Well memory leaks are a thing, and other than by killing leaking processes one by one in activity monitor or terminal, rebooting will release the leaked memory (temporarily). (A memory leak is when a process fails to release memory after it is no longer needed, and keeps consuming more and more memory unnecessarily.)

 
Last edited:
Welcome to the debate. Only 3,479 posts to read... :)


People here will debate 8GB vs. 16GB with more red-faced heated passion than the car guys debate motor oil on my BMW forums. I attribute the "facts" about either topic to little more than anecdotes, urban myths and bigfoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TorontoSS
People here will debate 8GB vs. 16GB with more red-faced heated passion than the car guys debate motor oil on my BMW forums. I attribute the "facts" about either topic to little more than anecdotes, urban myths and bigfoot.
Early on in the M1 release cycle there really was a problem. Actually, there probably still is but it is much more rare now. I had a brief burst that wrote dozens of TBs over a 24 hour period when the computer wasn't in use. It only happened once on Big Sur and never again. There are other reports of similar problems but they have mostly died down to a very occasional report.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.