Apple has already done that: it's called iMac. Duh!Maybe they could build it inside a monitor! Imagine that!!!!!
Apple has already done that: it's called iMac. Duh!Maybe they could build it inside a monitor! Imagine that!!!!!
Less materials + smaller packaging + more units per flight trip... = Apple saves moneyWhat real advantage is there to it being smaller? You still need monitor, keyboard etc.
Twice the price 👌Half the size, half the number of ports.
The size does matter because with a bigger case, and thus bigger vents, you can get the same airflow using a lower velocity, thus reducing wind noise. And you can also use a larger, slower fan, thus reducing fan noise.Only if it is passively cooled. If it used an internal heat sink and a fan (like the current Mac mini) then the case material and surface area doesn’t impact cooling capacity. The aluminum case is purely cosmetic.
I suspect they will go for the same sort of Ethernet on the brick that the new iMacs have.I hope they don't move to an external power supply like the older models (2008). That model had a BRICK.
Ideally, you would still be able to tuck the Mac mini underneath the studio display. So not too high.I wonder if they're going for the old Time Capsule aesthetic - thin and tall. Incidentally, that was around the width of a modern Apple TV.
View attachment 2404207
Just build it into a keyboard ! The new MacKey
I hope not, Gurman’s leak says it will be slightly taller than the current mini, not obnoxiously taller…I wonder if they're going for the old Time Capsule aesthetic - thin and tall. Incidentally, that was around the width of a modern Apple TV.
View attachment 2404207
I doubt they release an affordable monitor, but now that I think about it, this would be a good time to release a new Apple Studio Display, maybe with mini LED technology?Apple should finally make an affordable Mac mini with an affordable monitor to go with it. This could actually make them a lot of money as they would sell huge numbers and increase the dominance of their ecosystem. More people means more subscriptions.
If you look at what’s behind a current Pro Mini, there is no way they would be able to put the same ports on a smaller enclosure. So, yes, for sure they will either reduce the number of ports, or put ports on every side ( very unlikely).I hope they don't sacrifice I/O for the sake of a smaller enclosure.
Yeah, but imagine if they made one only 5mm thin!Apple has already done that: it's called iMac. Duh!
I really hope its not an external powerbrick combo, thats just faking small IMHOI suspect they will go for the same sort of Ethernet on the brick that the new iMacs have.
At the same time, USB-C power is desirable as an option.
Maybe they will be able to run on USB-C-only but need to use a power brick to get wired Ethernet? (Or a totally separate third-party USB-C to Ethernet adaptor.)
I really, really hope not!
It would be a terribly idea.
Things go wrong with the keyboard (and they do!) I have to throw away the Mac? Madness.
Besides, some of us prefer other keyboards.
I’ve never realised that until now the Ethernet port was included free of charge.That would make sense. The *average* Apple customer just needing a base model Mini would never use it.
Need ethernet, faster CPU, more memory/storage, etc? Simply pay for it. Easy.
What does that even mean, though? There is no regular Mac any more. If you took the screen off an iMac, would it be the mac you're talking about? What size would that be, because clearly it doesn't need the volume of that case? Would it be a Macbook? That's even thinner than what you're saying we don't need. The Mac Mini is the basic mac, whatever size it ends up being.Totally unecessary. The mac mini should just be a mac without the screen....and cheaper. It doesn't need to be any smaller.