Unless you’re rendering stuff the M1 stuff is probably still more than enough for people. It aged like a fine wine.im thinking M4 is good enough for 90% of folks. i have a M1 Pro MBP at home and its still silly fast!
Unless you’re rendering stuff the M1 stuff is probably still more than enough for people. It aged like a fine wine.im thinking M4 is good enough for 90% of folks. i have a M1 Pro MBP at home and its still silly fast!
You can on Mac Minidoesn't look like you can get 64GB memory on the M4 Pro, tops out at 48
Well how much of RAM are you currently using on Intel and what software stack is being used? If you're using more than 36GB (not including caching) as baseline I would go above 48GB. If not, I would buy the 48.Since this is all unified memory (as opposed to the separate memory on Intel), if I go from a 64GB i9 (w/8GB GPU), am I going to feel constrained with 48GB on a 14" MBP? Note that I have two 6K XDR external displays, so will the Max 64GB be a lot better, considering that I don't really need the extra processing power? I uses it mostly for software development.
Depends on project size. If you're rendering films length videos all day then Max. Most people will be happy with the Pro. Why not order one and try it yourself?What I miss is a use case. I really do not know how GPU and CPU-intensive Photoshop, Lightroom, Camera Raw, etc., is, or when the 20 GPU cores more between the Pro and Max make a difference for Premiere Pro or any other video editing tool. I use an M1 Max in a MacBook Pro for photo and video editing. This could be an M4 Pro with lots of memory, but when would I need a Max?
Because there are different choices now, I have no clue.
Is it this page where I see the benchmarks? I don't eve seen Apple M chips on the first page. Which is embarrassing.It's stunning how slow these chips are. If you look up their benchmarks online, which rarely resembles reality, they're BELOW the i5 12k Intel chips. That's incredibly slow.
You can use activity monitor and see how much RAM your workflow uses down to each app. If you're able to make use of most if not all of your RAM, you could still see swapping with the 48GB computer. The memory being unified only helps with how quickly things get in and out of it, or for varied loads where maybe your GPU needs more RAM.Since this is all unified memory (as opposed to the separate memory on Intel), if I go from a 64GB i9 (w/8GB GPU), am I going to feel constrained with 48GB on a 14" MBP? Note that I have two 6K XDR external displays, so will the Max 64GB be a lot better, considering that I don't really need the extra processing power? I uses it mostly for software development.
This could be an M4 Pro with lots of memory, but when would I need a Max?
Not only Pro vs. Max, it's often hard to know just what usage patterns will benefit from a range of choices.at my office I have an M2 Max Mac Studio and at home I currently just have a base m2 Mac mini and the mini seems just as fast at most of my photoshop tasks and other uses.
I'm guessing this chips require huge amounts of cooling?Is it this page where I see the benchmarks? I don't eve seen Apple M chips on the first page. Which is embarrassing.
If you’re not doing heavy video editing or in game development the pro is plenty good. I’m still running an M1 Pro for software development and I have no issues.What I miss is a use case. I really do not know how GPU and CPU-intensive Photoshop, Lightroom, Camera Raw, etc., is, or when the 20 GPU cores more between the Pro and Max make a difference for Premiere Pro or any other video editing tool. I use an M1 Max in a MacBook Pro for photo and video editing. This could be an M4 Pro with lots of memory, but when would I need a Max?
Because there are different choices now, I have no clue.
I am just a photographer. Sometimes, I open 150 raw files in Photoshop and edit them one after the other. Use Lightroom for image editing and exports. I also use 4k 60fps Canon R5 video files for shot videos and have to edit and export them. Typically when I edit video's I do not do anything with photoshop or lightroom they are separate workflows. But I do not know if they are CPU intensive or GPU intensive, if they need a lot of unified memory, or just a little bit. It's not that clear.If you’re not doing heavy video editing or in game development the pro is plenty good. I’m still running an M1 Pro for software development and I have no issues.
I guess so. I wonder if there is a real comparison to the high end Mac Pro and High end PC with similar prices to see which one really is the faster when processing things like Video, Audio, Rendering things in that nature. I'm leaning PC will be win this out.I'm guessing this chips require huge amounts of cooling?
Dude just run the Activity Monitor and see how demanding your workflow is.I am just a photographer. Sometimes, I open 150 raw files in Photoshop and edit them one after the other. Use Lightroom for image editing and exports. I also use 4k 60fps Canon R5 video files for shot videos and have to edit and export them. Typically when I edit video's I do not do anything with photoshop or lightroom they are separate workflows. But I do not know if they are CPU intensive or GPU intensive, if they need a lot of unified memory, or just a little bit. It's not that clear.
Dude, I did, but when using an M1 max, nothing is really demanding; it's a beast. But I am trying to find out what is enough for the coming years. I can and will run Activity Monitor, but that does not show how many GPU cores are running and how many e-cores or p-cores are in use at the same time. If that is not known, how can I make a good choice?Dude just run the Activity Monitor and see how demanding your workflow is.
I highly recommend using iStat Menus and see how CPU and Memory are utilized when you're pushing your system with a lot of work, that will give you a personalized idea of your needs: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/istat-menus-7/id6499559693?mt=12I am just a photographer. Sometimes, I open 150 raw files in Photoshop and edit them one after the other. Use Lightroom for image editing and exports. I also use 4k 60fps Canon R5 video files for shot videos and have to edit and export them. Typically when I edit video's I do not do anything with photoshop or lightroom they are separate workflows. But I do not know if they are CPU intensive or GPU intensive, if they need a lot of unified memory, or just a little bit. It's not that clear.