Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why not CFexpress Type B?
Because type A is smaller and modern Sony mirrorless use it.

But that’s also a good point. The only slot that universally covers everyone’s needs is USB-C, and the iPad Pro already has it.
 
Am I the only one who wants to see them bring MagSafe to the iPad Pro!? It would mean much less wear and tear on the USB C port. (Alternately dual USB C ports would be awesome.) it would make the iPad Pro less of an anchor if someone breaks the charging port. They could either use MagSafe from the iPad or they could use the MacBook version. But either way the iPad is one of those devices that sometimes it’s pick up and go sometimes you leave it plugged in. But it would be awesome to not have to try and slot a fragile USB C port in every time you’re done using it portably.
 
They always mention "better power efficiency" at each chip iteration, but for some reason it always translate to "more heating". Now Apple wants their products to work for the hive, giving their tireless toil to Queen AI.
 
Apple also rumored to fire Tim Cook and provide him with an escort out of the building next week
 
We keep enjoying the USB-C to SD Card reader dongles. Honestly, SD Card slots are a wasted input on MacBook Pro as this is meant for photographers and creative illustrators for those that need storage on the go. No one uses it.
I hate to say it but that space and channels could be another usb port or thunderbolt port anything, the HDMI is far more useful, I would love to see a NIC back on board but I know I am asking for to much
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.