I don't see where "Mac-like" hardware would be the determining factor. Anyone can sell you superior build quality at a price. Ports, storage, CPU, RAM, display... as buckets of parts, "quality" shouldn't matter at all - everyone is sourcing from the same component makers. Go down the checklist, find all the models with the desired features, put them into a spreadsheet, sort on price, buy the cheapest.
It's all about Windows, as far as I'm concerned. It was that way in 1985 - make the installed base of IBM-compatibles sufficiently Mac-like that Microsoft's customer base wouldn't jump ship - same hardware as before, and it's got windows and a mouse, just like a Mac.
So, save a few hundred bucks. If you're already adept with Windows, then there may not be a $300 initial productivity hit/learning curve. Your paid applications may all be available in Windows at no charge to convert the platform. Or not. Add an anti-virus subscription... That's the stuff that matters.
Since we just passed Star Wars Days, I'll paraphrase Yoda... "There is no 'like.' There is either Mac, or Not Mac."