T.Rex said:Though in reality, if you really need a faster hd, you really shouldn't be looking at the mini at all - or if you will be editing lots of videos, just get an external 7200rpm firewire drive.
Hoffer said:Please don't take this as an attack, but it bugs me when people say this. 🙂
Hoffer said:The reason I'm getting a mini is because it's the perfect size for me
dongmin said:For surfing and email, no. But for running iLife? Hell, yeah.
T.Rex said:You're right, no one who has a laptop has ever successfully used iLife.
JeffTL said:Remember that the Mac Mini is basically an iBook G4 without all the parts that make an iBook cost at least twice as much -- the battery, the LCD, and even the keyboard and trackpad.
And an iBook G4 is a pretty nice computer.
AppleInsider said:Contrary to popular belief, the mini is not based on the Cube or even the iBook G4. According to sources, the mini is based on the USB 2.0-enabled eMac and shares many of the same technical specifications, including the same processor, system bus, DDR RAM, graphics chipset, USB 2.0, FireWire 400, AirPort, Bluetooth, and an Apple Internal 56K V.92 Fax Modem.
numediaman said:You forgot the 😉 , right? At least, I hope so.
SonySnake said:Still have a 60 GB 4200 RPM hard drive in my 17" Powerbook last time I checked, I have yet to find a high end app photoshop through final cut that it doesn't handle
kkapoor said:Here are pictures of a Mac mini taken apart and an excellent comparison review at Macintouch:
Review:
http://www.macintouch.com/perfpack/comparison.html
Pics:
http://homepage.mac.com/maanerud/PhotoAlbum1.html
I would like to see some step by step pics of someone doing a hard drive replacement (I believe Kevin Rose will be doing this shortly). I personally would like to squeeze the most out of the mini. I have a Thinkpad T40 in which I put in a Hitachi 60GB 7200RPM drive and the performance gain was unbelievable; it was like a completely new machine. This is exactly what I would want to do with the mini.
I'm having lots of fun reading all the commentary and analysis going around about the Mini. Personally I have never owned a Mac and have usually built my own PC's. A friend of mine at the University of Toronto got a 15" powerbook and I was mesmerized by OS X (mind you I was equally mesmerized by the price). Nevertheless, this is the most excited I have been about a piece of computer equipment and more importantly the kind of software that it comes natively with.
I'm still contemplating wheather to wait till the release of Tiger. I believe Apple will release two more models of the Mac mini when Tiger is released with a slightly beefier graphics card. This would be, and has been, the standard Apple move in the last couple of years. Diversifyng the product line will definitely benefit them in the end (even if the price is jacked by $100).
I'm getting impatient.....must resist the temptation to buy!!!
Oh yeah, and another thing, I hope someone releases an affordable DVI KVM that is reliable. (Don't even mention the Belkin one, it's been pulled because of serious quality issues)
*raises hand*MacNeXT said:The fact is that the Mac Mini may be targeted at not-so-power-hungry consumers, but there are always people who don't fit the intended target and buy the product anyway. Those people are the ones that take the risk of opening up the case to put their own memory and hard-drive in. They are the "special cases", and often the REAL tech savvy people. They make it fit their needs if it doesn't.
Because the Mac Mini is such a revolutionary product, it attracts a lot of those people. Apple probably knows this, and they're fine with it. There are a lot of those people on this forum - including me.
billystlyes said:wait that does not sound right! Anyways I must say I'm pretty impressed with this litte box. Cannot hear it running although the slot drive is kind of loud. The finish and style are great. Only thing bad so far is iLife 05 did not come pre-loaded had to install from dvd. Speed is alright nothing to brag about, video card seems to be a little weak, 64 mb would have been alot better. I would have to give it 3 out 4 stars, it would have been a 3 1/2 if the video memory was a tad better. But over all this is a winner.
http://www.123macmini.com/pictures
billystlyes said:wait that does not sound right! Anyways I must say I'm pretty impressed with this litte box. Cannot hear it running although the slot drive is kind of loud. The finish and style are great. Only thing bad so far is iLife 05 did not come pre-loaded had to install from dvd. Speed is alright nothing to brag about, video card seems to be a little weak, 64 mb would have been alot better. I would have to give it 3 out 4 stars, it would have been a 3 1/2 if the video memory was a tad better. But over all this is a winner.
http://www.123macmini.com/pictures
stealthboy said:Anyone who is criticizing the Mac mini because of its specs ( not enough RAM< needs a 3.5" HD bay, etc) just doesn't get it. If you care about specs and stuff like this, then the Mac mini is not for you. Just buy an iMac or a G5 PowerMac! The Mac mini is meant for people who want the software experience to just work. They want iPhoto and iTunes and don't care about megabytes of RAM or the size of the HD. They want the excellent Mac experience.
So, please quit yer yapping. I see too many people going on about how Apple should have added Part A or Piece B to the Mac mini. Well that would raise the price above the magical $500 price point. The whole point of the Mac mini is to get a cheap, small, easy to use Apple into the hands of new users.
Let's get some perspective here, people! This is not the machine for a power user. Apple sells other machines for those users.
misr12 said:Finally, I read a posts that makes sense. Apple got this one right.
They have put out an affordable Mac for swithcers that offers them a great virus free mac experience.
numediaman said:Then you won't want to hear this story:
I lined up at the Apple Store this morning with a moderately large group of potential mini buyers. About half were loyal mac users, the rest switchers -- which I found encouraging. While we waited for the store to open, we Mac users talked about the Mac OS and about what it would be like to use their new mini.
The store opened a few minutes before nine to accommodate people and we were herded into a line at the register. None of the Apple store people were very interested in helping anyone -- it reminded me of Best Buy.
The enthusiasm of people dipped immediately. Next was the realization that only base models would be available -- Apple had not sent upgrade kits to the store. No upgrades would be possible. No RAM upgrades, no Airport Cards, etc.
A couple of people happily bought their minis, but the rest turned around and left. No one wanted a computer like what Apple was selling out of the box. No switchers had bought their first Macs.
By 9:05 the store was empty (and I didn't buy my mini, either.)
Later, on the way home, I called CDW to see if they were stocking minis. They said they had minis in stock, but could not upgrade the ram for same day delivery. Plus, they were selling the RAM upgrades for considerable more than normal for the mini. According to the representative, the 256 meg chip in the mini is worthless to them, so they just leave it in the box. As a result, a 512 RAM upgrade would cost you $119 plus an installation charge. 1 gig upgrades would cost $449 plus installation -- but was not available anyway because they did not have the chips in stock.
I was concerned about people not understanding the "no monitor -- no keyboard" approach. But in the end, switchers understood this. It is that fact that Apple can not deliver the computer they want that caused the loss of sales.
EDIT: Just to let you know that I am not a Mac basher . . . I just went online and placed my mini order. I finally decided on the 1.42 Ghz mini with added RAM, Airport Card & Bluetooth. It quoted me 3 to 4 weeks -- plus five days for delivery. Being a Mac user I guess I will have to wait -- but switchers will not like having to wait this long for their first Mac. Imagine what it was like for those who bought a G5 PowerMac when they were introduced as their first Mac!
Wow that's a real eye opener.kkapoor said:Here are pictures of a Mac mini taken apart and an excellent comparison review at Macintouch:
Review:
http://www.macintouch.com/perfpack/comparison.html
Very sobering for thosse people clamoring for a G5 powerbook (myself included).Apple is using the G5's special "slewing" feature to reduce heat and power drain, and the result is a real bottleneck. In real, everyday applications, Apple's cheap G4 systems may well pace the fancy G5 models at a half or third the cost.