Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
anthonymoody said:
Well, count me among the switchers. I just pulled the trigger (took about a million firefox attempts to get all the way through the checkout process so I think I'm not alone!) Here's my config:

Mac mini 1.42GHz
Part Number: Z0B8
Accessory kit
Internal Bluetooth + AirPort Extreme Card
80GB Ultra ATA drive
Combo Drive
56K v.92 Modem
512MB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
Mac OS X - U.S. English
Estimated ship: Deliver by Jan 22nd
Delivered within 5 business days after shipping
1

I really wanted to get the gig of RAM but it was like $300+ more than the 512 upgrade so I'll have to make due. Should be no problem for my usage I'd think (and hope...)

TM



dont buy your ram through apple. its way too expensive. check out ramjet or crucial.
 
No Audio In/Asteroid stackability

Am I the only one who sees there's no audio in on the Mini because the upcoming Asteroid audio interface may be marketed as an accessory to attach to the computer? It looks stackable but there's have to be some way to keep it from slipping off.

product-asteroid.jpg


indextop20050111.jpg
 
Apple!Freak said:
All I will be using my soon to come iMac for is the basic stuff (IE email, surfing the net, chating), playing games and digital photo editing.

I think the iMac will suit my needs perfectly. Im still debating whether I should sell my PC which cost me $2,000 which would sell for about $500 (INSANE how much you loose on a PC) now to put towards the iMac or just have both just incase. What do you guys think?

Long story short? Keep your PC for gaming, do everything else on your new Mac.
 
Aaronijohnson said:
Am I the only one who sees there's no audio in on the Mini because the upcoming Asteroid audio interface may be marketed as an accessory to attach to the computer? It looks stackable but there's have to be some way to keep it from slipping off.

http://images.appleinsider.com/images/product-asteroid.jpg[img]

[img]http://images.apple.com/macmini/images/indextop20050111.jpg[img][/QUOTE]

Small rubber feet. :)
 
nagromme said:
You have feel bad for this guy: http://billpalmer.net/

But hey, he took a firm position :)

That was probably the most deluded site I've seen in a while. Oh well. In any case, the people I've shown it to have been very positive so far. "Ooooh, pretty - how much does it cost? - holy cow! - gotta get me a couple of those."
 
MontyZ said:
Then you shouldn't even be considering the Mac mini or iMac if you need lots of power. You should instead be considering a Powermac G5, but, that's going to cost you.

Wow, this is all relative. I remember editing digital video on my G4 400Mhz with 128 MB ram and 40GB harddrive. The whole setup cost me about $3000 dollars. And of course at the time, it was the fastest Mac available. Fast forward 5-1/2 years, and now we are saying its underpowered. I just have to think how grateful I am as I am pulling out my credit card.
 
Yvan256 said:
Long story short? Keep your PC for gaming, do everything else on your new Mac.

Yeah, agreed. If the Windows PC isn't that old and you have room for it, you might as well keep it. Why take such a huge monetary loss? It's always good to have choices.

I have a middling Windows system that still does all right for gaming. And I slapped a big HD in there and put it on the network as my iTunes server and iPod station. And for TiVoToGo whenever the software update finally arrrives for my TiVo (Mac version is supposed to be in the works too).

Mac OS X really is pretty easy to file share with Windows so you can definitely have the PCs play well together.
 
brywalker said:
I am very surpised that no one has brought up the fact that there is no audio input on this machine, a must for GarageBand IMHO.

That was the dealbreaker for me.

I was at the checkout stage before I noticed. :(

spend $30 bucks and get iMic.
 
Apple!Freak said:
Thats what I was thinking about but do iMacs really suck at gaming?

The sad answer is pretty much yeah, iMacs are not great for gaming. I'll stop short of saying they suck for gaming, but it's all relative. All current Macs ship with serviceable GPUs. They'll play most current Mac games reasonably, but there are exceptions. It's not that Macs are inherently sucky gaming PCs, but most Mac games seem to be quick and dirty ports of the Windows versions, so performance can really suffer.

If you're going to play computer games, you might as well play them on Windows. I know plenty of hardcore gamers who have Macs and love them (myself included), but they all have other avenues for gaming, such as consoles. No serious gamer would own solely a Mac and no other hardware.
 
Apple!Freak said:
Thats what I was thinking about but do iMacs really suck at gaming?

In my view, they're great for gaming. As good as a high-end dual G5 with X800 that can handle high-res, high-detail, higher-playercounts, and big maps without a hiccup? No. But still great fun and nice looking. I say that based on gaming on a machine much slower than an iMac G5!

But that's subjective. Someone who demands more isn't wrong. And it depends on the game, too. Only you can judge what you find good, bad or acceptable for gaming.

I too suggest keeping the PC, at least for a while, but I never recommend a PC as a gaming machine unless the user is prepared to accept the downside of that. The upside is obvious: more games! But there are more Mac games than I could ever buy. Then there's bragging rights: on PC, you often get the game several months earlier, and get to enjoy all the fun 1.0 bugs :D The downside is that you still have to deal with Windows, and Windows security. I don't have the time or interest in doing so, and that makes a PC a bad gaming machine for me. You may find the same thing to be true, once you're spoiled by OS X. Or you may be glad to have a PC around for gaming--especially if you don't go online and don't have to worry about viruses and patches. It's really your call--may as well keep BOTH machines until you're sure.
 
Can anyone in America let me know how much the various educations discounts are?

Over here we get:

Standard price
Education price
Higher education price

I can get the Higher Education price but over here in the UK the Higher Education price is still the standard price as word hasn't come down from America as to what the discount will be (according to the girl at Apple I was talking to).

Anyway, are the various prices updated in America yet? It would be a great to work out what I can afford to add before pay day!

Thanks if you can help.
 
Apple!Freak said:
I am making the switch!

Now I'm not sure which to get. I think I will go with the iMac G5 but I'm not sure. It's between the iMac G5 20" and the Mac Mini 1.42Ghz.


iMac G5 20" 1.8GHz SuperDrive
Part Number: Z096
SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
512MB DDR400 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
Bluetooth Module + Apple Wireless Keyboard & Mouse + Mac OS X - U.S. English
Accessory kit
Power Supply
None - Bluetooth Module
160GB Serial ATA drive

$1,955 - Free Shipping W/Student Discount

OR

Mac mini 1.42GHz
Part Number: Z0B8
Accessory kit
Internal Bluetooth
80GB Ultra ATA drive
Combo Drive
56K v.92 Modem
512MB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
Wireless Keyboard & Mouse Set
Mac OS X - U.S. English

$1,789 - Free Shipping W/Student Discount

Note: I think you did not mention the 20" Apple Display for the mini...

Go with the mini. The 20" stand-alone display is reported to be much better than the one included with the iMac. Of course the iMac is a bit faster now. But as you can keep everything besides the actual mini box you will probably get a faster mini after MWSF '06. With the iMac you are "stuck" performance wise for its lifetime...
 
Has the Mac Mini got a 2.5" hardrive or a 3.5" ?
And what rpm has it got, 7200?

I wonder if it's hard to replace the hardrive...

Anybody know if Core Video and Core Image will be supported with the 32 MB ati card that comes with the MiniMac ?
 
Platform said:


Bought the 1.4 version with 256mb RAM, did not realise at the time it states RAM must be installed by an Apple techie, is this really the case. Its looks pretty easy to install if you ask me.

Also I assume a bluetooth dongle will work just fine with this, as I have a spare I did not add one one as an option.
 
MacMiniOwner said:
Bought the 1.4 version with 256mb RAM, did not realise at the time it states RAM must be installed by an Apple techie, is this really the case. Its looks pretty easy to install if you ask me.

Also I assume a bluetooth dongle will work just fine with this, as I have a spare I did not add one one as an option.


Well for the ram the only reason i can seen is because of the way that they have mounted the shell of the case :rolleyes: I would also buy the 1.4 but with at least 512MB ram
 
Now that we know all the fact about the new Mac mini

1.
How would a
1.42Ghz
80GB
1GB/512MB Ram
SuperDrive
Ati 9200 32MB VRAM

Do performance wise and what can it be used for :confused:

2.

Since it comes with the 9200 with 32MB VRAM, and apple has said that the lowest card supported for core image is the gfx5200, will this be able to run Tiger with core image(apple will make some sort of a tweak to enable the 9200 for core image)

3.

I have a Pentium 4 2.8Ghz
512MB RAM
80GB
Gfx 5200
Combo drive

Could the Mac mini replace/be on the same level of computing as it(OK slower cpu :confused: but less ram so would it compensate for that, and it would offcourse run OS X and i really hope Tiger too :eek: :D )

Thank you, need some info to be able to make disition of buying or not :confused:
 
finally "it" has arrived

i wasn't able to fall asleep last night because i was so excited (i spent the hours before configuring around in the apple store and looking for nice additions)

make that:
future_macusers++;

i'm going to buy one ....feels like waiting for christmas all over again

i still got a few/a lot questions left so i would appreciate it if somebody could answer my questions in my thread in the the 'buying tips+advice' section of the forum
 
dotmike said:
Just wait until you hear the poms start whining!

No whining here my convict decended friend! ;) The brit price of £339 is just about a current dollar rate conversion, which makes for a refreshing change. So much so I will be ordering a mac mini at the end of the month :D
 
Apple!Freak said:
Yeah, I agree. I need something to replace to my somewhat powerful PC. Currently I'm running a P4 2Ghz Processor with 512mb, a Radeon 9200 128mb card and Audigy 2 sound card.

My only concern about the iMac is the Game performance IE Video Card and the Sound quality IE Sound Card.

I am somewhat of an Audiophile and have around $300 headphones so I need a powerful sound card like the Creative Audigy2. Now do you think the iMac will supply me with a good enough sound card that compares with the Audigy2?

Next is the Video card. Does the iMac have enough power to feed power hungry games like Halo?

Thanks!

Excellent solution: A 149$ XBOX plays Halo, as well as Halo 2 Very well, no dropped frames. Surround sound, HDTV output. Bigscreen capable.

+

499$ Mac Mini = 649$

Half the price of an Imac G5, and trust me, the Xbox plays halo better than an Imac !

I have always been a firm believer in console gaming. I like turning it on, now tweaking, having the newest games, being able to easily play online with a community, etc. I know, its Microsoft, but, hey, they got one right, they are entitled to that every now and then!

Note, next XBOX is POWERPC YEAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.