Can be annoying, but switching to a new standard is always tough. If companies don't remove them we will carry these legacy ports around forever. They are the ones that can force everyone else to finally adapt.
Actually, PC makers would be the ones to "force" such a change. Mac is just a fraction of the whole. There's a little influence from our little slice of that pie... but unless PC goes wherever Apple wants to go... the general remedy for us is buy adapters/hubs/dongles to connect with most stuff... OR pay way up for select accessories that supports where Apple has decided things should go now.
See for example lightning/30-pin/firewire 800/firewire 400, etc (or even
EVERY generation of Thunderbolt). If PC makers had mass adopted them too in their time, then peripheral makers would have jumped on in volume. Instead, mostly just Apple adopted them and only Apple peripheral makers
sometimes adopted them (at premium prices of course to support a standard for a slice of a much smaller market).
USB-C already has
some PC adoption but PCs still generally ship with some USB-A too (particularly USB 4 and USB 3.2 gen 2). While they do, Apple trying to "force" any port is just another case of Apple being Apple... as we've seen many times before.
And the Defenders slinging hubs is exactly the same answer: "SPEND MORE MONEY" to buy hubs/dongles/adapters to replace what Apple is
choosing to take away." That remedy fits
ANY such choice... such as if they decided to go Lightning 2 Pro Max or a USB-8 Mach 3, etc.
The Defenders are right that throwing more money at hubs/dongles/etc will address the problem being created by a rumored
CHOICE... but it costs their fellow consumers (and themselves?)
more money (because removal of on-board utility never seems to translate into a lower price from Apple Inc) AND clutters up the desk top (in this case) with
additional hardware and cables.
For what purpose? We "spin" to "force adoption of 'the future'"... a 'the future' Apple just resisted adopting in iPhone until a GOV entity had to "force" adoption, with Apple kicking & screaming all the way... and the Defenders joining that chorus with rationalizations like "wobbly", "broken tongues" and "lint magnet." I guess none of that applies here. Now that Apple fully
likes USB-C, "we" fully like it too. 🤪 Bring on the "wobbly!"... bring on the "broken tongues!"... bring on the extra expense in hubs/dongles to buy back fundamental utility being ejected from a desktop not really needing to be "more portable" or "thinner" or "lighter" for possibly
anyone.
My guess is all thunderbolt ports... and don't we all just love thunderbolt 4 hub pricing??? But we can save a lot of money by stepping down that Thunderbolt power by treating it like only a USB-C port with a cheap USB-C hub. And that's better somehow than just leaving a few USB-A ports in for the peripherals that we
already own that still connect that way. Why? Because Apple says so. You will comply. Resistance is futile.