Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No USB A ports:
BOOO! That sucks. So much stuff is still USB A. USB C is obviously so much better, but it’s so inconvenient to not have USB A, especially on a desktop, and even more so for a desktop that you’re supposed to “bring your own keyboard and mouse”. Apple isn’t doing anyone a favor here, just guaranteeing many of their users will get stuck having to buy adapters and hubs, which for non-tech people, is almost always a struggle. Apple’s hubris condemns us to dongle hell.

For the front USB C:
That’s great. I think every desktop needs front USB. I wish my Mac Studio had 4 front USB ports (2x C and 2x A preferably).
USB-C --> multi USB-A multi-port hubs are as simple as plugging it in. No power. Not sure how "non-tech people" would struggle with plugging in a cable in the back (or front).

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Surprised by this:
  1. Removing the power supply from the internals would remove a source of heat, leave more space for heatsinks or allow an even smaller case
  2. Apple already make suitable external power supplies (e.g. that come with a MacBook Pro)
  3. It would allow for USB-C power delivery, meaning a one cable link to a Studio Display etc (althouh perhaps needing a 140 W supply which may require a new Studio/XDR display)
I’m guessing for the M4 Pro version Apple doesn’t think the 140W is enough to power a device without a battery to fall back on during times of high load. Or maybe it’s just cheaper to integrate the power supply.

There was a time when a lot of Apple products had an external power bricks (Mac minis and Cinema Displays), and they were all different wattages despite some having the same connector. If you bought one used which was missing the brick it would be a nightmare of tracking down one of the correct wattage, and if it required the higher wattage usually being shocked at the price.
 
Can be annoying, but switching to a new standard is always tough. If companies don't remove them we will carry these legacy ports around forever. They are the ones that can force everyone else to finally adapt.
The funny thing is that USB-C at this point… Isn’t even a new standard.
The first devices with it, most of which were by Apple, came out almost a decade ago.
At this point, it’s almost as old as lightning was when Apple started discontinuing it last year.
 
I don’t have a problem with home devices losing usb-a but I will admit I still constantly have people come up to me with usb-a thumb drives on site at work. I’d value a usb-a port on a mbp much more than an hdmi port.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Shame, isn't it? People talk about Apple being behind, yet when they try to embrace usb-c, you all instead choose to dig in your heels and stick with existing connectors instead of hopping on board.
You know, there's a difference between using adapters and hubs on a desktop computer vs a laptop. No one wants to carry around a bag of adapters and hubs and have to dig one out when they need to plug in a USB-A flash drive. A desktop, on the other hand, can have a hub attached all the time.

Complaining about ports on a MacBook is reasonable to me, but a Mac Mini that sits on my desk can have all sorts of things connected to give me more ports and I don't care.
 
We should not be accepting this on a desktop computer!

What are we doin' here!?
If anything, it’s better that it happens to a desktop computer than a laptop computer.
Irrelevant, of course, since Apple hasn’t shipped a laptop computer with a USB-A port since 2018, but with a desktop, you can plug in a dock and forget it.
With a laptop, every time you put the thing in a bag, you’ve gotta disconnect the dongles and reconnect them the next time you use them… not a problem with the stationary desktop.
 
Can be annoying, but switching to a new standard is always tough. If companies don't remove them we will carry these legacy ports around forever. They are the ones that can force everyone else to finally adapt.

Actually, PC makers would be the ones to "force" such a change. Mac is just a fraction of the whole. There's a little influence from our little slice of that pie... but unless PC goes wherever Apple wants to go... the general remedy for us is buy adapters/hubs/dongles to connect with most stuff... OR pay way up for select accessories that supports where Apple has decided things should go now.

See for example lightning/30-pin/firewire 800/firewire 400, etc (or even EVERY generation of Thunderbolt). If PC makers had mass adopted them too in their time, then peripheral makers would have jumped on in volume. Instead, mostly just Apple adopted them and only Apple peripheral makers sometimes adopted them (at premium prices of course to support a standard for a slice of a much smaller market).

USB-C already has some PC adoption but PCs still generally ship with some USB-A too (particularly USB 4 and USB 3.2 gen 2). While they do, Apple trying to "force" any port is just another case of Apple being Apple... as we've seen many times before.

And the Defenders slinging hubs is exactly the same answer: "SPEND MORE MONEY" to buy hubs/dongles/adapters to replace what Apple is choosing to take away." That remedy fits ANY such choice... such as if they decided to go Lightning 2 Pro Max or a USB-8 Mach 3, etc.

The Defenders are right that throwing more money at hubs/dongles/etc will address the problem being created by a rumored CHOICE... but it costs their fellow consumers (and themselves?) more money (because removal of on-board utility never seems to translate into a lower price from Apple Inc) AND clutters up the desk top (in this case) with additional hardware and cables.

For what purpose? We "spin" to "force adoption of 'the future'"... a 'the future' Apple just resisted adopting in iPhone until a GOV entity had to "force" adoption, with Apple kicking & screaming all the way... and the Defenders joining that chorus with rationalizations like "wobbly", "broken tongues" and "lint magnet." I guess none of that applies here. Now that Apple fully likes USB-C, "we" fully like it too. 🤪 Bring on the "wobbly!"... bring on the "broken tongues!"... bring on the extra expense in hubs/dongles to buy back fundamental utility being ejected from a desktop not really needing to be "more portable" or "thinner" or "lighter" for possibly anyone.

My guess is all thunderbolt ports... and don't we all just love thunderbolt 4 hub pricing??? But we can save a lot of money by stepping down that Thunderbolt power by treating it like only a USB-C port with a cheap USB-C hub. And that's better somehow than just leaving a few USB-A ports in for the peripherals that we already own that still connect that way. Why? Because Apple says so. You will comply. Resistance is futile.
 
Last edited:
Can be annoying, but switching to a new standard is always tough. If companies don't remove them we will carry these legacy ports around forever. They are the ones that can force everyone else to finally adapt.
So?

How is that a problem?

USB-A ports are useful. This is a desktop computer, it's not constrained for space, there's no valid reason to make it any smaller than it already is. There's ZERO reason to remove them.

They still make PCs with PS/2 and serial ports. The VAST majority of PCs come with USB-A ports. No one is hurt by this, and they sometimes come in handy. It's only Apple that keeps stupidly removing useful ports.
 
So if you use Logitech/normal monitors just expect to drop 200 bucks for a TB4 dock.

No one is going to burn a port with a single A to C adapter.

Good docks are expensive don’t buy cheap garbage.

Docks are really fun. Especially with Apple devices. Mac’s are the only things I own that don’t work with them properly. I can buy a Chromebook for 200 bucks and hook it up to my TB4 dock and have two screens keyboard and mouse.

My $1600 M2 MacBook Air can only use one screen. Apple is 100% anti consumer in the computer world.

Love my iPhone but every time I try to mess with a computer from Apple stuff like this annoys me to no end.

Yes I can spend thousands on Thunderbolt monitors that have a resolution I hate (QHD FTW). My monitors are exactly what I want and are what 200 a piece? Work on everything except Apple. Yes I’m aware I can spend 4000 dollars on a laptop I don’t need for extra monitor support.

So realistically this Mini requires special docks etc that will only be for this computer/Apple devices. And no it’s not a cheap adapter on Amazon it’s a couple hundred bucks for a decent dock or thousands for things I don’t need that are Apple compatible.

EDIT: Let’s not forget business either. We have a Mac mini at our Datacenter for building our mobile application. It’s already a royal pain since we had to buy a special 1U shelf and rig an external hard drive to it for backups. Now if we want to replace it we need to purchase a dock just to be able to hook it up (Ethernet and hard drive).
 
Last edited:
Yeah exactly, I’m not getting the cadence of rage and complaints here on MR.
During the whole conundrum on lightning ports (which I find still great, easier to plug/unplug and lighter than the considerably bulkier by comparison USB-C) was that they were an old thing and people wanted to get rid of lightning things.

Well, USB-A is way older, so now’s the chance to get rid of all that once and for all. And by the way, USB-C specifications are already a decade old for that matter, people should have pushed for full on thunderbolt compliance instead! Now we are stuck by law to the lesser denominator.

Thunderbolts (USB-C) are an EVERYTHING port, it can become card reader, screen output, dvd player, storage expansion, the beloved USB-A for some here, etc.
Heck even HDMI, a $5 dongle can make it be an HDMI output or even also an HDMI capture input for $10 for those that need it.
For example, nothing I have even uses HDMI anymore just straight up thunderbolt that happens to display 5K+ resolution, daisy chain to many more thunderbolts, charge the devices, etc ALL AT THE SAME TIME… something other ports can’t dream on doing.

And again, those using the exact same lightning rationalizations, HDMI is also a many decades old port too.

Now, I get it, I’m not convincing anyone here, this is not about congruency or rational thinking, this is about “I got a many years old wired mouse that I love to use so I want to impose decades old ports on everyone else’s computers”.
At least it’s a good thing that just a few things here and there have been carried on… or our computers would still have floppy, Zip/CD/DVD drives and who knows what else.

So, a middle ground, kudos to HDMI, audio jack, SD card… but maybe let’s treat USB-A the way lightning did. Time to let go?

My .00002 opinionated cents

It’s really just about being able to easily use existing hardware without needing to buy extra adapters or cables. And even new hardware, lots is still shipping with USB-A. And since apple hates internal expansion, external is the only choice. So they should have an “all of the above” strategy with ports, within reason.
 
Ports? Who needs 'em.

Screen Shot 2024-09-01 at 11.06.07 AM.png
 
I can’t wait for USB A to finally disappear. There are still new cars and RVs that only have USB A ports. Almost all hotels I stay in only have USB A ports.

Not only should everyone switch to USB C by now, those ports used for charging should also have enough power to power a laptop.

I still have to bring USB A to USB C cables in case I rent a car or stay in a hotel that does not have USB c. Hopefully Apple can convince people to move on some day.
Even hotels that do have USB-C ports tend to have crappy ones that can only deliver 15 watts with no PD.

This is why I always carry my own charger and end up using it instead of what the hotel provides.
 
These are desktop computers
There is no need to be removing a port that is still highly useful

Why are we trying to even further "shrink" and "port constrain" a desktop computer?

What's that accomplishing?
I suspect it has something to do with saving bus Lanes for other chips. Even if USB-A port is only for 5Gbps speed, they still need to assign some lanes to those ports for them to be useful, or add converter chips to support it, and bean counter Tim Apple Just didn’t want it to happen.
 
For what purpose? We "spin" to "force adoption of 'the future'"... a 'the future' Apple just resisted adopting in iPhone until a GOV entity had to "force" adoption, with Apple kicking & screaming all the way

What purpose indeed …
Retaining a single USB-A port would be the best solution for the consumer

Then again, worrying about what’s best for customers LONG ago took a back seat to:

“Make number go up”

It’s all Tim cares about now
Anyone thinking otherwise is deluding themselves.
 
I LOVE my M1 Mac mini. This redesign seems awesome. I feel having the power supply be internal is also essential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: asdfjkl;
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.