Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well I am glad they are working fast on this.

Apple have caused problems with 10.4.10

One example they are aware of is the fact SCSI devices (tape drives in particular) have become unstable and unusable (dropping off chain, crashing, hanging etc). This is confirmed by at least 5 manufacturers and Apple do have it slated to fix.

This is good news so finish off this then we can look forward to the new OS in a while.
 
One example they are aware of is the fact SCSI devices (tape drives in particular) have become unstable and unusable (dropping off chain, crashing, hanging etc). This is confirmed by at least 5 manufacturers and Apple do have it slated to fix.

SCSI? SCSI?!? Thought that was deprecated, oh, about 8 years ago with the introduction of the iMac. Except for PC's (jeez, why do they still use that port you have to screw in?!?).
 
I think they should keep their version numbers double decimal. Let's stop being childish here. 10.4.91 follows in 10.4.9 and everyone knows that. 10.4.10 is the same as 10.4.1. Are we reverting to the first update of Tiger? Certainly not. Stop this, Apple!
 
:D

Of course if they did that, then people would complain about "missing the 80-odd updates" between 10.1 and 10.91. . . .

--J.D.
 
I think they should keep their version numbers double decimal. Let's stop being childish here. 10.4.91 follows in 10.4.9 and everyone knows that. 10.4.10 is the same as 10.4.1. Are we reverting to the first update of Tiger? Certainly not. Stop this, Apple!

Blah blah blah, version numbers are not decimal, standard explanation of how version numbers work, no such thing as double decimal, blah blah blah.

It really does get tedious explaining this stuff over and over again.

While we're on it, does anybody know what the Chinese writing in those iPod mock-ups mean?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.