Agreed totally.
Don't get me wrong, I still want and will buy Leopard. However, the look and feel is patchy, and overall it doesn't look or feel like a huge leap above Vista, and probably won't slow Windows adoption as much as a real kick-arse L&F might have.
I personally don't accept the premise that Leopard has to make a big leap over Vista visually at all.
Microsoft's pendulum seems to be in the exact opposite swing, but with time Windows users will get tired of the effects and Microsoft will swing back to something simpler.
.......
People have seen Aqua and that whole sort of look, it's not amazing anymore. It's very early-2000s. It's not in style anymore. They spiced up the Dock a little, but on the whole Apple is reeling things back in.
I think that's what's driving the simple gradients of the folders and making everything more low-key. Most things are a pendulum. It swung way to one side with Aqua, now it's swinging back to a more low-key look aimed at productivity.
...
People have seen Aqua and that whole sort of look, it's not amazing anymore. It's very early-2000s. It's not in style anymore. They spiced up the Dock a little, but on the whole Apple is reeling things back in.
Low key? A garish green background, translucent menus, popup stacks that open in an arc, reflections galore in a fake 3D Dock...
The trash icon really needs to be made 2D, it's inconsistent.
The blue dot should be made white not blue, it would work with any coloured desktop then, par that, its perfect 😛
If the UI doesn't change much between now and release time, I don't have any plans to upgrade. Not for awhile at least. Something about Leopard's UI just seems too Vista-like.
I've been an OS X user since 10.1. I have liked all of the UI enhancements Apple has made until now. I hate everything about the translucent menu bar, the boxed corners, the icons, and obviously the fact that it's transparent. I like the fact that they are trying to unify the window look, but I'm not too crazy about the UI they've gone with. I really haven't liked iTunes since its UI was overhauled in version 6. I'm not too fond of the sharp but rounded corners on everything.
Really the only thing I like as far as Leopard's UI is concerned is the Dock. I like its reflective and 3D qualities.
If the UI doesn't change much between now and release time, I don't have any plans to upgrade. Not for awhile at least. Something about Leopard's UI just seems too Vista-like.
I wonder...
- Finder windows can also be set to always show the path of a file
I guess it's human nature to want to criticize and complain about everything, but the truth is, it's a stellar system, with many more improvements under the hood. 🙂
The reason Leopard looks so ugly is because the traditional OSX UI team was busy working on the iPhone whilst Leopard was being developed. So they brought in a lesser team to pull up the slack in their place, and the result is the crap-fest UI we see today.
I wonder...
But it has everything I don't like about vista athletically. Mainly a clashing of colours and textures. If they just brought everything in a little.
I do like the new icons....but I just wonder what they will look like in real-world situations ie. when they are small. They look great at 128x128 or whatever res they are, but scale them down to the size I will look at them while I'm working...will they be as nice and easily distinguishable from one another?
Can anyone who has been testing Leopard tell us what they are like small?
The bigger problem with the menu bar is that when you click on a menu, the drop down menu is not translucent (which is great) but the menu bar remains translucent. It looks unfinished and jarring (as do the HUGE shadows on windows that jump out when you switch applications).
If Apple have to have the translucent menu bar (and I also don't like it) they should at least make it fade to non-translucent when the mouse enters the menu bar, and stay that way until the mouse moves away, or a menu item is selected.
That's the attention to detail you expect from Apple. Or maybe "expected" from Apple - personally I think Leopard is a mess of styles and experiments gone wrong, and that's probably because Apple took all the resources away to work on the iPhone and left a skeleton team of people to continue work on Leopard without real UI supervision.
The new folder icons look fantastic... at > 128x128. At anything smaller they are hard to distinguish from each other. That's an example of style over substance once again. As are the small lights to indicate running apps on the Dock - that's an obvious problem that has been mentioned by numerous people since WWDC, yet Apple didn't fix it for this build either...
And the Leopard background (wet grass) is awful. Wet grass has nothing to do with a desktop - which is why an abstract look was always a better initial choice. That image looks like something from XP or Vista, and the water droplets look a lot like the little lights on the Dock which add to more confusion because of the reflections in the Dock. When Steve showed the desktop at WWDC everyone laughed - me too, I thought he was making a Vista joke. That should have been a wake up call to him and the developers on Leopard, but apparently not.