Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You.. dream about operating systems? :confused:

I know someone who was dreaming about a PSW (program status word, as use surely don't know - that was well back in the late 80s, early 90s)... And that's much worse that that fancy Spaces stuf, I can tell you.
 
At school, my dashboard hot-corner provides that function :p

Ditto. Any X Window based UN*X gui have been havin' it for aaaages... So, "Only in Leopard"? For Christ sake! That reminds me that M$ blurb about "new" preemtive scheduling system that they "invented" or "put forward" or whatever was the buzz word and used in their Win NT. A collegue of mine with somewhat more substantial un*x experience by that time told me then: "Do they think that we are all plain stupid or they just can't or don't read docs and specs?"

So having been using X Window Pager (Spaces is analogous, though somewhat fancier) since about 1993, as far as I can remember, I can probably ask *exactly* the same question: "Only in Leopard"?..

That's ... cheap.
 
The more Space, the more their is to devour. Now weather that is in a virtual environent, a natural environment, or the natural habitat of a leopard like me. iLike it, I'm hungry, I can't wait to be unleashed on the world and to eat up screens and the humans using them, rrraarr!


Just like the more space, the greater potential for my Mac to suck down RAM. Is there any relevance to the idea that Spaces may consume massive amounts of memory?
 
Spaces works amazingly in combination with Expose, and it's far better and simpler than any virtual desktop app I've used. I have Expose set to my 3rd mouse button. I'm going to need a mouse with a 4th button for Spaces.
 
Lots of people on these forums seem to be having dreams about Leopard.

I had a dream about a naked woman...

Done up in spots, like a leopard....

Hogging my Mac which just had OSX 10.5 installed.
I never even got to use it, yet.

There were tears, frustration, and sorrow in this dream.
OS 10.5 does that to me.
 
I know someone who was dreaming about a PSW (program status word, as use surely don't know - that was well back in the late 80s, early 90s)... And that's much worse that that fancy Spaces stuf, I can tell you.

Ah yes, "someone"...everything embarrassing happens to "someone I know", never "me" :p
 
Spaces works amazingly in combination with Expose, and it's far better and simpler than any virtual desktop app I've used. I have Expose set to my 3rd mouse button. I'm going to need a mouse with a 4th button for Spaces.
Maybe it's time to start using two mice!

With more and more handy options for Finder meta-actions (Exposé, Spaces, Dashboard), we're soon going to have trouble remembering our function key and mouse button assignments.
Just like the more space, the greater potential for my Mac to suck down RAM. Is there any relevance to the idea that Spaces may consume massive amounts of memory?
I'm speaking on theory here, not from experience with Leopard, but I'd expect that the primary reason RAM usage would increase is because you'll be more likely to leave a number of applications open at once, and switch back and forth among them. That's a benefit of Spaces, but if your Mac is memory-strapped when you run lots of apps, you won't be able to take advantage of it.

I wouldn't expect it to add much overhead for Spaces to store extra information about where your windows are within the set of desktops, and when you don't use an application, having it open doesn't make much difference since it's only holding virtual memory.

Now I'm curious to learn whether I'm right about this.
 
Whats the percent chance that Leopard will be available for 69 dollars with education discount?
 
Very nice! I first used work spaces waaaay back in my HP-UX days almost ten years ago. (damn, I feel old)
HP-UX's Visual User Environment defaulted to six workspaces but the number was configuable.

Yeah I used VUE as well, I even had an HP 9000 workstation at home for a while :) It even had a (forerunner of a) dock as well! For its time it was brilliant.

However don't expect exactly the same as X-Windows workspaces from Mac OS X Spaces. In Mac OS, one program can only be on one space. So for example you can't have one safari window in space 1 and another in space 2.

I find this very constricting, I can remember many occasions where it was very useful to do exactly that under HP-UX. (e.g. working on an HTML page with a browser and a texteditor on one workspace, and browsing slashdot in the same browser app on another). In HP-UX (and every other X-Windows based desktop environment like KDE and Gnome) you can do all that. You can even choose to have one window appear on more than one workspace. So you can put your IM client in the right-hand corner on all your workspaces so you can see it no matter what space you're on.

I'd say Apple restricted their spaces in that way to make it easier to understand for novices but they should have made a way to turn on the ability have 2 windows of the same application on different spaces for power users. The way it's done now it's not too useful for me. So I don't expect to use it much.
 
I'm not sure if I'd want to swap out Exposé for Spaces, as that's currently what I have my middle mouse button set as... when I'm using a mouse.

Use the Hot Corners for Expose in each space then set the middle mouse button for birds eye spaces. I LOVE LOVE LOVE Expose in the Hot Corners. I feel like I'm in a FREAKING straight jacket when I have to use a PC lol :p
 
...
However don't expect exactly the same as X-Windows workspaces from Mac OS X Spaces. In Mac OS, one program can only be on one space. So for example you can't have one safari window in space 1 and another in space 2.
...

If I understand you correctly, that contradicts what AI says - specifically regarding safari.

appleinsider said:
What if you want to browse the web in one Space related to your research project, while also having a browser window open next to Mail in another? You can do that too, by simply creating a new window of whatever application you want to live in multiple Spaces.
With regard to sticking windows so they appear in every "space", I didn't see that mentioned in the AI article but I hope it's implemented in spaces.
 
One can use the Activity Monitor to prioritize apps.

I'd never heard that Activity Monitor allows you to prioritize apps, but you can prioritize different program's processes using the renice command in the terminal. I'd also bet that there's a shareware or freeware app out there that'll do renice-ing without needing to open the terminal if you aren't comfortable with that.
 
you can't have one safari window in space 1 and another in space 2.

The article says you CAN have separate windows of the same application open in different spaces, and they even used the safari window as their exact example!

Appleinsider article said:
What if you want to browse the web in one Space related to your research project, while also having a browser window open next to Mail in another? You can do that too, by simply creating a new window of whatever application you want to live in multiple Spaces. In the case of multiple browser windows, you can select New Window from Safari's Dock icon, although not every app supports this. This creates a new window for that app in the current Space, even if it has windows in another Space already.

edit: oogje beat me to the answer. That's what I get for responding to a comment from a window that I haven't reloaded in awhile.
 
at last

"the most advanced os in the whole universe" will have multiple desktop solution. About 4 - 6 years after linux, yes?:rolleyes:
 
If I understand you correctly, that contradicts what AI says - specifically regarding safari.
The article says you CAN have separate windows of the same application open in different spaces, and they even used the safari window as their exact example!

Yes, you're both right, sorry! If I recall this correctly it did allow every App only on 1 space when it was presented at WWDC'06. The article is also mentioning that it doesn't work with every app so Apple might have tweaked Safari a bit. Or I just got it wrong when I read about it in 2006.

Anyway I stand corrected. I'm glad, too, because Spaces will be much more useful to me now.
 
Question. So lets say I have Adium open. And I have it assigned to desktop 4. What happens when I'm in Desktop 1 and I get an IM? Can you assign parts of apps to a desktop? Or am I going to miss the notification? The only possibility I can think of is setting up Growl to permanently leave a new message on all 4 desktops at the same time so I don't miss anything. :confused:
 
I am sort-of a mac noobie, but I was wondering how long it would take apple to come out with 10.5.1. If I buy Leopard when it comes out, will 10.5.1 be a simple software update or will I miss out on it entirely unless I buy the new version?

Software update and my money is on a .1 release within 2 months.

Just like the more space, the greater potential for my Mac to suck down RAM. Is there any relevance to the idea that Spaces may consume massive amounts of memory?


Doubt it. Only if Apple did a really piss poor job on integrating it into the OS. What is going to eat up the lion's share of your RAM is going to be the additional apps running on the system. That and I'm willing to bet the memory buffers and the frame buffer itself on the GPU are going to get hammered hard with this feature. Allowing you to swap back and forth between apps so easily means their is going to be some hard core caching going on. Thank god I got a 256MB card for my MBP. If they had the option I would have gone 512 though. Apple has been moving the processing of more and more of their GUI onto the GPU where it should have been a long time ago. I'm dead serious when I say get the biggest vid card you can afford or that Apple has for the system you are looking at. You will thank yourself in the long run.
 
Not what I was hoping for with spaces

The dock stays the same.

Ex. If you click on the mail icon and there is a window open in another space, it will switch to that space. If there are multiple windows in multiple spaces each click of the icon switches to a different window in whatever space it's in.

As I understand it from the above post, you can't customize the dock to each space. Not what I was expecting. I want to have a space for writing where I have word processing and dictionary open, with only those icons in the dock. I don't want safari or email in the dock so there is less temptation to interrupt my writing to research something and get bogged down in the internet--no comments from the peanut gallery on will power, please. :)

Then I'll have a space for research and communications where I'll just have safari and email icons in the dock. Am I missing something here? Isn't part of having a virtual desktop about customizing the desktop and what you have quick access to?
 
Spaces Lacking Organization Capability

See my later post! I'm retracting this whole thing!

Sadly I don't see a way to use Spaces effectively.

I'm needing to put windows that address the different things I'm working on onto different visual desktops. I do some instrument control stuff, some web development stuff, some music stuff.

I get e-mails about all of these things. Now I do want e-mails, PDF's, manufacturer web sites that relate to my machine control work to appear on the machine control page.

But I never want an e-mail, say, on the topic of algorithmic music composition, to appear on the machine control page. And if it does show up by accident on that page, I should be able to move that to the correct desktop. The same paradigm should also be applied to the other task areas of my computing day.

Unfortunatly, I can't see how to do that at all. Apple has forced the Spaces to be on an APPLICATION basis, that is safari can appear on ALL spaces or it can appear only on ONE (you only select which one from the system preferences pane -- no hot key for that action).

The trouble is that most applications are useful for more than one task. And once a window has been assigned to a Space, I see no way to move it. There is no way that the OS or application can tell the user's intent of a window, But the user can, but only at the time a window is actually put on the screen. Apple's designers have made a design decision that removes that choice from the user.

OS 10.5 has only been out for a day, and I'm barely up to strength with it. But I'm stumped. I just don't think the system designers at Apple did their homework on this one. It's a cute feature, and seems like a winner when you get the demo from the sales person, but I find it unusable for my work.

If I have missed some part of the documentation please let me know. If you are having the same opinion as me regarding the functionality of Spaces, let Apple know.

This seems to be a basic omission of foresight on the part of the Apple design staff. They usually do such a good job, no, a great job. This job ... not so much.

"Maybe it's the mad-cow": Denny Crane
 
I am not sure what you mean, moving a window once it's assigned. I was under the impression that in the expose view of the spaces you have running, you can just drag a window from one space to another... is this not true or am I missing exactly what you are trying to say you want to be able to do?
 
I am not sure what you mean, moving a window once it's assigned. I was under the impression that in the expose view of the spaces you have running, you can just drag a window from one space to another... is this not true or am I missing exactly what you are trying to say you want to be able to do?

yes. you can force all new windows of a particular app to open in a specific space or you can open it in any space or you can drag individual windows of any app to any space. I just open spaces then expose them all drag a particular window to a space that I need to use it with another window. I think the previous poster is confused.
 
I am not sure what you mean, moving a window once it's assigned. I was under the impression that in the expose view of the spaces you have running, you can just drag a window from one space to another... is this not true or am I missing exactly what you are trying to say you want to be able to do?

No you can, when in birds eye view you can drag windows to any space. Hell if you take a window, drag it to the edge of the screen and hold click, it will push that window over to the next space. The thing I really like is that you can do expose in particular spaces in birds eye view. Spaces has to be my favorite feature in leopard, soooo nice!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.