You.. dream about operating systems?![]()
I know someone who was dreaming about a PSW (program status word, as use surely don't know - that was well back in the late 80s, early 90s)... And that's much worse that that fancy Spaces stuf, I can tell you.
You.. dream about operating systems?![]()
At school, my dashboard hot-corner provides that function![]()
The more Space, the more their is to devour. Now weather that is in a virtual environent, a natural environment, or the natural habitat of a leopard like me. iLike it, I'm hungry, I can't wait to be unleashed on the world and to eat up screens and the humans using them, rrraarr!
Lots of people on these forums seem to be having dreams about Leopard.
I know someone who was dreaming about a PSW (program status word, as use surely don't know - that was well back in the late 80s, early 90s)... And that's much worse that that fancy Spaces stuf, I can tell you.
Maybe it's time to start using two mice!Spaces works amazingly in combination with Expose, and it's far better and simpler than any virtual desktop app I've used. I have Expose set to my 3rd mouse button. I'm going to need a mouse with a 4th button for Spaces.
I'm speaking on theory here, not from experience with Leopard, but I'd expect that the primary reason RAM usage would increase is because you'll be more likely to leave a number of applications open at once, and switch back and forth among them. That's a benefit of Spaces, but if your Mac is memory-strapped when you run lots of apps, you won't be able to take advantage of it.Just like the more space, the greater potential for my Mac to suck down RAM. Is there any relevance to the idea that Spaces may consume massive amounts of memory?
Very nice! I first used work spaces waaaay back in my HP-UX days almost ten years ago. (damn, I feel old)
HP-UX's Visual User Environment defaulted to six workspaces but the number was configuable.
I'm not sure if I'd want to swap out Exposé for Spaces, as that's currently what I have my middle mouse button set as... when I'm using a mouse.
...
However don't expect exactly the same as X-Windows workspaces from Mac OS X Spaces. In Mac OS, one program can only be on one space. So for example you can't have one safari window in space 1 and another in space 2.
...
With regard to sticking windows so they appear in every "space", I didn't see that mentioned in the AI article but I hope it's implemented in spaces.appleinsider said:What if you want to browse the web in one Space related to your research project, while also having a browser window open next to Mail in another? You can do that too, by simply creating a new window of whatever application you want to live in multiple Spaces.
One can use the Activity Monitor to prioritize apps.
you can't have one safari window in space 1 and another in space 2.
Appleinsider article said:What if you want to browse the web in one Space related to your research project, while also having a browser window open next to Mail in another? You can do that too, by simply creating a new window of whatever application you want to live in multiple Spaces. In the case of multiple browser windows, you can select New Window from Safari's Dock icon, although not every app supports this. This creates a new window for that app in the current Space, even if it has windows in another Space already.
can you imagine how much this box would worth???![]()
If I understand you correctly, that contradicts what AI says - specifically regarding safari.
The article says you CAN have separate windows of the same application open in different spaces, and they even used the safari window as their exact example!
I am sort-of a mac noobie, but I was wondering how long it would take apple to come out with 10.5.1. If I buy Leopard when it comes out, will 10.5.1 be a simple software update or will I miss out on it entirely unless I buy the new version?
Just like the more space, the greater potential for my Mac to suck down RAM. Is there any relevance to the idea that Spaces may consume massive amounts of memory?
The dock stays the same.
Ex. If you click on the mail icon and there is a window open in another space, it will switch to that space. If there are multiple windows in multiple spaces each click of the icon switches to a different window in whatever space it's in.
Sadly I don't see a way to use Spaces effectively.
I'm needing to put windows that address the different things I'm working on onto different visual desktops. I do some instrument control stuff, some web development stuff, some music stuff.
I get e-mails about all of these things. Now I do want e-mails, PDF's, manufacturer web sites that relate to my machine control work to appear on the machine control page.
But I never want an e-mail, say, on the topic of algorithmic music composition, to appear on the machine control page. And if it does show up by accident on that page, I should be able to move that to the correct desktop. The same paradigm should also be applied to the other task areas of my computing day.
Unfortunatly, I can't see how to do that at all. Apple has forced the Spaces to be on an APPLICATION basis, that is safari can appear on ALL spaces or it can appear only on ONE (you only select which one from the system preferences pane -- no hot key for that action).
The trouble is that most applications are useful for more than one task. And once a window has been assigned to a Space, I see no way to move it. There is no way that the OS or application can tell the user's intent of a window, But the user can, but only at the time a window is actually put on the screen. Apple's designers have made a design decision that removes that choice from the user.
OS 10.5 has only been out for a day, and I'm barely up to strength with it. But I'm stumped. I just don't think the system designers at Apple did their homework on this one. It's a cute feature, and seems like a winner when you get the demo from the sales person, but I find it unusable for my work.
If I have missed some part of the documentation please let me know. If you are having the same opinion as me regarding the functionality of Spaces, let Apple know.
This seems to be a basic omission of foresight on the part of the Apple design staff. They usually do such a good job, no, a great job. This job ... not so much.
I am not sure what you mean, moving a window once it's assigned. I was under the impression that in the expose view of the spaces you have running, you can just drag a window from one space to another... is this not true or am I missing exactly what you are trying to say you want to be able to do?
I am not sure what you mean, moving a window once it's assigned. I was under the impression that in the expose view of the spaces you have running, you can just drag a window from one space to another... is this not true or am I missing exactly what you are trying to say you want to be able to do?