Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, I'm a nitpicky designer type, and everything in my UI has to feel --just-- right or I'm not happy, so yes, it does matter to me. I currently have UNO Light/Smoothstripes mod (dark = ick) installed and many of the programs I use have interfaces that I have custom-modified to meet my specifications.
All the more reason to get rid of the silly rounded corners. They're very 2000. If you look at the trends in design, you'll see that rich colors and clean edges are very much in vogue. I expect a lot more combinations of arcs and plumb lines as the interface continues to evolve, along with the replacement of dated-looking gel effects. Aqua is an interesting idea, but it doesn't really capture "water" in a contemporary interpretation. Instead, light and texture are the new directions.

For the people complaining about the "darkening" of the UI, just remember that this is a work in progress. No matter what they produce, some people are going to prefer the old style. As I've said before, I expect some particularly vibrant color accents in key areas with more subdued color elsewhere. You can't take advantage of color and lighting if everything is a happy, middling blend like it is now (bright greys and muted colors). The darker grey window colors set up much bolder system controls and room for lighting effects (which would lack contrast on a light base color). Richer colors create more dramatic environments (that means darker greys). We've already seen the beginnings of this (Front Row, Quick Look [the eye button in Finder], iPhone, AppleTV, Time Machine, the Apple Developer website, and others).
 
I, too, like brushed metal under some circumstances. It looks good on a few programs, two being Safari and iTunes 4. I hate that Apple got rid of brushed in iTunes... it really fit nicely.

macosx103-1-1.png

OMG, how I miss the old iTunes :( The brushed metal, the buttons on the bottom right, the uber cool button on the top right with it's cool animations...
 
Personally, these screenshots seem too fake for me...

I know that the edges are more square and everthing, but I still think someone got UNO running on Leopard... Or had some fun in Photoshop.

I mean, when some icons are crooked in a mockup of say, an iPod, everyone yells "PHOTOCHOP!" But here, people are blaming the off-centered icons on Leopard being in beta stage...

And don't you think Apple Legal would have had these taken down by now?

P.S. (Of course, I could always be wrong... remember the screenshots of System Prefs in Tiger, where the word "Desktop" was spelled "Dekstop" and everyone called it fake?)
 
Personally, these screenshots seem too fake for me...

I know that the edges are more square and everthing, but I still think someone got UNO running on Leopard... Or had some fun in Photoshop.

I mean, when some icons are crooked in a mockup of say, an iPod, everyone yells "PHOTOCHOP!" But here, people are blaming the off-centered icons on Leopard being in beta stage...

And don't you think Apple Legal would have had these taken down by now?

P.S. (Of course, I could always be wrong... remember the screenshots of System Prefs in Tiger, where the word "Desktop" was spelled "Dekstop" and everyone called it fake?)

It's not UNO because it will apply that dark shade seen in Leopard Mail, Leopard and Tiger Safari, but not Tiger Mail. Plus, the dark shade applied to brushed metal windows in UNO makes the window title have an odd, white shadow.
 
If they'd only re-design that dumb looking "Home" icon-it looks too "XP-ish"

..and another thing...


Bet we'll see a 10.4.10 (or 11) before its all over
 
I haven't read every page, but there was some mention of 16x16 patterns within the screen shots. I feel slightly less insane for noticing little sideways "smilies" within every inch of screen shot. Harder to see on the light captures, easy to see on the right-hand side of the screen saver shot.

This a watermark, or a hidden pattern / code?

If I were slightly less dumb, I could look into it deeper - but I think me seeing this "pattern" is Saturday boredom going a little too far.

I used "control + scroll" to zoom in a bit for a better look.

I'm going to find something "productive" to do now.
 
I haven't read every page, but there was some mention of 16x16 patterns within the screen shots. I feel slightly less insane for noticing little sideways "smilies" within every inch of screen shot. Harder to see on the light captures, easy to see on the right-hand side of the screen saver shot.

This a watermark, or a hidden pattern / code?

If I were slightly less dumb, I could look into it deeper - but I think me seeing this "pattern" is Saturday boredom going a little too far.

I used "control + scroll" to zoom in a bit for a better look.

I'm going to find something "productive" to do now.

I just opened that image to check because that sounded interesting.
When I opened it, I thought it was a .gif at first.

The reason is that this pattern repeats all over it:
untitled2vu5.jpg

Is this what you mean?
 
That is exactly what I was seeing, I looked into the imageshack FAQ and it said that they do not watermark or alter images - so whats behind this particular pattern?

Is it intended to cover up, or alter any tracability or watermarks within the developer seed?

Thanks for the sanity check b.t.w. :D
 
That is exactly what I was seeing, I looked into the imageshack FAQ and it said that they do not watermark or alter images - so whats behind this particular pattern?

Is it intended to cover up, or alter any tracability or watermarks within the developer seed?

Thanks for the sanity check b.t.w. :D

No problem, although I'm slightly disappointed that there are no hidden emoticons in it. :)
It wouldn't be imageshack since I used that to host it as well!
 
All this talk of the GUI being re-developed, I am surprised that Apple hasn't incorporated the option for users to customize the colors and layout of their system. This would be especially useful for graphic designers and photographers, who make up a large portion of the Apple consumer market, as altering the color scheme of the system to personal preferences might improve individual work flow. Just a thought...
 
Is it intended to cover up, or alter any tracability or watermarks within the developer seed?

Thanks for the sanity check b.t.w. :D
All OS X developer software creates degraded screenshots. They may well be watermarks useful to Apple. The Tiger screenshots did the same thing.

The final version always removes the degradation/watermarking, so it is not a bug or a permanent change.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.