Mac Pro GeekBench-Whats your score?

[Obibob]

mac pro 1.1 2006 up graded

is this good or can i get it better new to macs

Single-Core Score Multi-Core Score
Geekbench 3.3.0 Tryout for Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
1418 4824
Result Information
Upload Date December 16 2014 12:05 PM
Views 3
System Information
MacPro2,1
Operating System Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Build 13F34)
Model MacPro2,1
Processor Intel Xeon 5150 @ 2.66 GHz
2 processors, 4 cores
Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
L1 Instruction Cache 32 KB x 2
L1 Data Cache 32 KB x 2
L2 Cache 4096 KB
L3 Cache 0 KB
Motherboard Apple Inc. Mac-F4208DC8 PVT
BIOS Apple Computer, Inc. MP21.88Z.007F.B06.0707021348
Memory 10240 MB 667 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM

 

[boodaddyz]

32bit mode Windows 8.1.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1518178

32bit Mode Mac OSX Yosemite..

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1518225

Can't explain the score difference between Yosemite & Windows 8.. Not bad for a 3.1 Mac Pro

 

[Ludacrisvp]

Apple OSX uses less system resources to run the OS compared to windows. Or geek bench and its sub components are coded better in OS X.

 

[Jani81]

Here's my result from Mac Pro 5.1 w3680 6 core.

 

[lowendlinux]

Apple OSX uses less system resources to run the OS compared to windows. Or geek bench and its sub components are coded better in OS X.

This is more the reason

 

[EdDuPlessis]

You can get two Macs with the same specs and same software and get different results in Geekbench. Just look at the Geekbench results page for examples. Benchmarks don't always run precisely the same and your computer's performance is always influenced by factors that you will barely notice such as apps running in the background, drivers, CPU temperature, room temperature, fan speed, disk movement, etc

When you benchmark to test your computer's health you should look for a median score gathered from a variety of conditions or even just a ballpark figure gathered from a number of users.

 

[Fangio]

Temporary pulled 2x4GB from my 8x4 setup to run memory in triple channel mode. With 32GB in 64-bit multi-core I'm getting 100-200 less.. oh well. Negligible.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1452254

 

[Baunkjaer]

As expected...

 

[flowrider]

^^^^Do you realize you are running a very old version of GeekBench (V2.4.3)? The latest release is V3.3, available here:

http://www.primatelabs.com/geekbench/download/mac/

Lou

 

[thornslack]

4,1 -> 5,1 2x3.46 Quad

Not bad for 2009

32-Bit Try Out:

 

[itcrashed]

I will be receiving my 64GB of RAM tomorrow so I wanted to run a benchmark with 16GB RAM on my 6-core Mac Pro Late 2013.

 

[Baunkjaer]

^^^^Do you realize you are running a very old version of GeekBench (V2.4.3)? The latest release is V3.3, available here:

http://www.primatelabs.com/geekbench/download/mac/

Lou

Yep. Didn´t have a 64 key for the new version. But I´ve now....

 

[Obibob]

new score

just upgraded to YosemiteGeekbench Score
1536
Single-Core Score
5495
Multi-Core Score
Section Description Single-Core Multi-Core
Integer Processor integer performance 1783 6636
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 1700 6534
Memory Memory performance 716 1136
Geekbench 3.3.0 Pro for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
System Information
MacPro2,1
Operating System Mac OS X 10.10.1 (Build 14B25)
Model MacPro2,1
Model ID MacPro2,1
Motherboard Apple Inc. Mac-F4208DC8 PVT
Processor Intel Xeon 5150 @ 2.66 GHz
2 Processors, 4 Cores
Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB x 2
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB x 2
L2 Cache 4.00 MB
L3 Cache 0.00 B
Memory 10.00 GB 667 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
BIOS Apple Computer, Inc. MP21.88Z.007F.B06.0707021348
Integer
Single-Core Score1783
Multi-Core Score6636
AES
single-core 168
147.8 MB/sec

AES
multi-core 656
575.4 MB/sec

 

[Synchro3]

Now 64 Bit Benchmark

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1618484

 

[scottsjack]

OK I GET IT!

That's it, New Years resolution; My GB 9500 2012 MP gets a used W3690 and an Apricorn Vel-Duo. I'll get back to this thread next week with details about my new happiness.

 

[Ludacrisvp]

OK I GET IT!



That's it, New Years resolution; My GB 9500 2012 MP gets a used W3690 and an Apricorn Vel-Duo. I'll get back to this thread next week with details about my new happiness.

Can you run two of those?

 

[flowrider]

^^^^Two of What?

Lou

 

[Ludacrisvp]

^^^^Two of What?



Lou

Lol oops. Should've been more specific. Was referring to the the processor.

 

[AlecZ]

This is more the reason

That wouldn't be good. GeekBench is supposed to create scores comparable between many different devices, including phones.

 

[lowendlinux]

That wouldn't be good. GeekBench is supposed to create scores comparable between many different devices, including phones.

It does but it's not coded well for anything beyond OSX.

 

[AlecZ]

It does but it's not coded well for anything beyond OSX.

Hmm, that stinks.

 

[flowrider]

Lol oops. Should've been more specific. Was referring to the the processor.

No, the W3690 has only 1 QPI Link so only for single processor application. The X5690 has 2 QPI Links, so for a single or dual processor Mac Pro. scottsjack appears to have a single CPU Machine.

Lou

 

[lowendlinux]

Hmm, that stinks.

This computer when running Linux with GB3 x64 would score just under 19000. This is the OS X run:

 

[apphotography]

This computer when running Linux with GB3 x64 would score just under 19000. This is the OS X run:

Mine the same 25,500 64 bit on Yosemite.

 

[lowendlinux]

Mine the same 25,500 64 bit on Yosemite.

All the Mac Pros from a like generation are going to score close the same with the sam processors not much you can do. The whole thing was that for a cross platform benchmark it does't do as well in Windows/Linux as it does in OS X. My computer didn't magically get faster after I installed OS X.