Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I went there, unregistered 4U. (PCIe cards you an install on your Mac Pro)

There is no list of PCIe cards, other than GPUs.
Yes, but that’s ONLY because you stopped when you got to Graphics cards. :)

Apple I/O card
Third-party PCIe cards
You can install many different PCIe cards in your Mac Pro, such as fibre channel cards, fibre networking cards, and pro video and audio interface cards.
Afterburner
RAID cards
 
How long has it been since they teased an Apple silicon Mac Pro? I'm pretty sure there is drama behind the scenes, it should have been out a long time ago.
Not likely any drama. It’s not like anyone’s going to beat them to the market with an Apple Silicon Mac Pro, they can take their time!
 
I don't think it's fully safe to assume third party PCI graphics cards will be supported on an Apple Silicon Mac Pro. The list of supported cards was tiny even on the Intel-based Macs, with driver support being notably lacking (especially non existent with nVidia gpus).
You’re right, it’s not. :) The fact is that, if this were Family Feud and the question was “Name something that goes into a PCIe slot on a Mac”, 98 folks in the survey would say “GPU’s”. Which is why people think “Well, with the graphics being internal, there’s no need for PCIe in an Apple Silicon Mac Pro. PCIe has ALWAYS been for more than just GPU’s, people either forget or never knew. That page is informational for anyone that doesn’t know what PCI cards other than GPU’s are used in Macs and what “could”, if the companies deign to create drivers for, work in an Apple Silicon Mac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
How long has it been since they teased an Apple silicon Mac Pro? I'm pretty sure there is drama behind the scenes, it should have been out a long time ago.
I believe the last we heard them mention anything about the Mac Pro was at the Mac Studio announcement in March, 2022. They specifically said their transition would be over with the final product, the Mac Pro, but that announcement was for "another day."
 
What are you talking about? Why do you think it doesn't have the dual engines? I think they even mention that specifically in their video.
Screenshot 2023-01-17 at 4.45.47 PM.png


This comes straight from their compare page. MacWorld also has an article that mentions it.
 
Notice what people do, not what they say: The Pro is definitely not a priority for Apple (it's been over 3 years since a refresh, that says A LOT). Apple mentioned it at the M1 launch and then went, meh.

Sure, at some point they'll unveil a crazy spec'd ( and priced ) flagship for those who absolutely must own a monster Mac but if the RAM isn't upgradeable (and it probably won't be), the only big selling point is the PCIe expandability. The internal drive space isn't a big deal now that external small enclosure/big capacity drives are cheap and quiet. The smaller and much less expensive Studio has satiated a very large portion of the Pro audience. They're not going to release a Pro that only has a 20% performance bump over the top spec'd Studio...so Apple's in a bit of a self-created quandary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: opeter
How long has it been since they teased an Apple silicon Mac Pro? I'm pretty sure there is drama behind the scenes, it should have been out a long time ago.
I imagine Apple strategy is to constantly throw out updated mac models as their AS processing evolves. If the time is right for another Mac Pro then the current intel model it will finally show up. Like the far fetched M2 extreme SoC rumor might not be as fictional as it's made out to be.
 
One of the reasons Mac Pro refreshes are on a longer schedule may be because they are mostly purchased by businesses that spread out the depreciation expense over a few years. When it's fully depreciated on their accounting ledger they are ready to buy more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
I expressed doubt that the M2Max has only one encode engine. Then:
Fair enough, but I still think they're wrong. Here's some text from Apple's news release (https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023...xt-generation-chips-for-next-level-workflows/), with boldface added by me:

"M2 Pro has an immensely powerful and efficient media engine, including hardware-accelerated H.264, HEVC, and ProRes video encode and decode, allowing playback of multiple streams of 4K and 8K ProRes video while using very little power. M2 Max features two video encode engines and two ProRes engines, bringing up to 2x faster video encoding than M2 Pro."

So here Apple clearly says that the Max has two engines. I also think I recall hearing this mentioned in Apple's video, though I won't swear to it and am too lazy to check.

We'll only know once we see benchmarks, but if I had to bet, I'd bet the M2 Max has two engines, just like the M1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrENGLISH
One of the reasons Mac Pro refreshes are on a longer schedule may be because they are mostly purchased by businesses that spread out the depreciation expense over a few years. When it's fully depreciated on their accounting ledger they are ready to buy more.
Yeah, about that.....

I would remind you that with the 6.1, when those 3 year leases were up, there was no new Mac Pro to sell to those businesses. 4 year leases - ditto, 5 year leases, ditto.

Yes, but that’s ONLY because you stopped when you got to Graphics cards. :)

Apple I/O card
Third-party PCIe cards

You can install many different PCIe cards in your Mac Pro, such as fibre channel cards, fibre networking cards, and pro video and audio interface cards.
Afterburner
RAID cards

Mighty bold of you to think that there are MacOS drivers for those things.

I have a number of PCIe cards that no longer work in MacOS because the drivers were never updated. 10.7 broke a LOT of things. Like my RAID card.

The end user has to contact the tech support for the card maker to find out if there is a driver available.

Or they can simply get a windows box and plug in almost any PCIe card and go to work.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: dysamoria
Professionals in the 3D modeling world will never have a fast enough machine. However fast this new Mac will be - pros will wish it was 10X (or 100X) faster.
Working in this area I can say 100%, my issue is Apple left Nvidia, big mistake, the GPU is a major issue for Apple, its a real shame, as many Render engines need a Nvidia cards. (or multiple cards)
 
Mighty bold of you to think that there are MacOS drivers for those things.
The OP wrote “I just don’t think Apple silicon is built in the way that makes it work in an upgradable tower (integrated graphics and RAM).” They, like many others, may not have been aware that PCIe slots have been used for other things in the past (and could potentially in the future) and that there’s actually more to upgrade for than just GPU and RAM. Vendors that are still shipping drivers for the 2019 MacPro are likely to provide drivers for whatever the next thing is Apple produces.
 
Calling it now since nobody will come back to this post 3-6 months from now.

Apple is never going to make another Mac Pro.
I think you may be right. My guess is they just don't sell many Pro's so it will never justify the investment in new silicon to make it fast enough for the market. This wasn't a problem on the Intel based Pro's because the processors already existed.
 
Working in this area I can say 100%, my issue is Apple left Nvidia, big mistake, the GPU is a major issue for Apple, its a real shame, as many Render engines need a Nvidia cards. (or multiple cards)
What render engine only works on nVidia; I am pretty sure all the major ones work just fine with AMD GPUs; and a lot of work is being done to optimize for Apple Silicon mainly because of the unified memory which offers more VRAM than even the best nVidia card. Check this thread out...

3D rendering on Apple Silicon
 
What render engine only works on nVidia; I am pretty sure all the major ones work just fine with AMD GPUs; and a lot of work is being done to optimize for Apple Silicon mainly because of the unified memory which offers more VRAM than even the best nVidia card. Check this thread out...

3D rendering on Apple Silicon
I can't speak for 3D rendering but I know that certain After Effects projects I've worked on do render faster on nvidia due to CUDA cores. But I believe that really depends on what plugins are being used in a particular project.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
Other wild mad guess is that the Mac Pro is effectively a "proper" 1U rackmount version of the Mac Studio that can be paired with rackmount thunderbolt storage and PCIe enclosures.


How long has it been since they teased an Apple silicon Mac Pro? I'm pretty sure there is drama behind the scenes, it should have been out a long time ago.

Spring (March) 2022 Mac Event, after the introduction of the Mac Studio headless desktops...

"Just one more product to go, Mac Pro; but that is for another day."
 
Calling it now since nobody will come back to this post 3-6 months from now.

Apple is never going to make another Mac Pro.

Who is their target market in 2023? I bet they sell a small handful of the 20 core Mac Studios and the market for a Pro above that would be an even tinier percent. Apple doesn't care about integrating a AMD/Nvidia GPU any more and not having upgradable RAM or SSD storage isn't a drawback for Apple.

I just don't see it.
Don't quit your day job because Apple predictions is not your forte. Apple wouldn't have specifically mentioned the Mac Pro in the keynote last year as being the last Mac to transition to Apple Silicon if that was true. Sorry but you are 100% wrong with that prediction. I would say that would be possible if Apple didn't say anything, but since they did, that means they for sure will.

And before you try to throw out other examples of things Apple has said in the past that didn't come to fruition, I can already preemptively say that that is not the same at all. Apple simply wouldn't have said anything in the keynote if there was even a chance that that was true. They could've easily just not brought it up and no one would have thought anything of it, but they did, simply because it is a certainty as a plan for their transition roadmap.
 
I can't speak for 3D rendering but I know that certain After Effects projects I've worked on do render faster on nvidia due to CUDA cores. But I believe that really depends on what plugins are being used in a particular project.
AE runs really good on my 2019 MacPro since I've upgraded the memory. Also a lot of AE plugins are being optimized for Apple Silicon also. It is a slow process. Good developers get stuff done; others lag lag lag.
 
I expressed doubt that the M2Max has only one encode engine. Then:

Fair enough, but I still think they're wrong. Here's some text from Apple's news release (https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023...xt-generation-chips-for-next-level-workflows/), with boldface added by me:

"M2 Pro has an immensely powerful and efficient media engine, including hardware-accelerated H.264, HEVC, and ProRes video encode and decode, allowing playback of multiple streams of 4K and 8K ProRes video while using very little power. M2 Max features two video encode engines and two ProRes engines, bringing up to 2x faster video encoding than M2 Pro."

So here Apple clearly says that the Max has two engines. I also think I recall hearing this mentioned in Apple's video, though I won't swear to it and am too lazy to check.

We'll only know once we see benchmarks, but if I had to bet, I'd bet the M2 Max has two engines, just like the M1.
They have now corrected the information on their compare and tech specs pages and the M2 Max does indeed have two encode/decode engines.
 
They have now corrected the information on their compare and tech specs pages and the M2 Max does indeed have two encode/decode engines.

Victory!!!

Wait, no.

Thank you for being a seeker of truth. All too many not like that around here...

(And also thanks for saving me the trouble of remembering to try to figure this out next week!)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.