They're much too useful!Hard to reach ports seems to be Ive's signature design motif. Reminds me of trying to plug a jump drive into an iMac.
I'd bet good money that the front ports on the Mac Pro tower were NOT Ive's idea.
They're much too useful!Hard to reach ports seems to be Ive's signature design motif. Reminds me of trying to plug a jump drive into an iMac.
I'd bet good money that the front ports on the Mac Pro tower were NOT Ive's idea.
Might be part of the nMP strategy. Make the HW/SW so compelling to get people to take a serious second look at a piece of software that ONLY runs on your platform.
I'm in agreement with those who wants a few ports on the front.
Occasionally I find the need for front data ports during a work session with a client where I'm using multiple USB sticks and/or portable FW raids to transfer data.
Exactly! This is what the Commodore Amiga did back in the day. It sent the home computer market several steps forward, and then when the Video Toaster was built specifically for it, it really took off with video people everywhere.
----------
Think of it as a work of art! And at only 10" tall you really don't have far to get to all of your ports.
People saying turn the Mac Pro around are daft. The giant power plug is coming out the back.
I was waiting for someone to point that out. Glad you did.
I'm not to sure I understand the issue with the cable hook ups, doesn't the older Mac Pro have the cable hook ups on the back?
watch first 15second where the guy struggles with getting access to the ports...
Wow. I've seen the pictures, but I never quite realized how freakishly tiny the thing was until watching that. Man, I could save a ton of desk space with that thing...
Great. Now I want one.
Why do you have your computer on the desk?
seems like too many people are focusing on finding problems instead of solutions.. solutions to problems are way better than problems.
I'm not to sure I understand the issue with the cable hook ups, doesn't the older Mac Pro have the cable hook ups on the back
If only Apple focused on the solution instead of forcing users to work around the problem they created. Granted it's not a show-stopper, but Apple chose appearance over practical functionality once again. I believe aesthetics and functionality can coexist.
dunno.. the designers working for apple are pretty much masters at combining aesthetics with functionality.
i guess we just see it differently.
We literally see it differently, highly reflective glossy displays being the most obvious example. Long live the anti-reflective 30"ACD.
(as in- if you don't like something.. don't buy it.. pretty simple, right? )
That's why I still haven't replaced my aging 30" ACD's.
The real issue is that Apple makes compromises to functionality for the sake of appearance, the Apple store being the most 'glaring' and noisy example.
right.. that's why i said we see things differently..
i think it's good to put strong emphasis on aesthetics when designing something.. you- not so much.
no biggie
Happy Holidays to all!
Cheers!
yeah, on the back under a desk and attached to a 60lb chunk of metal..
the new design's ports are so much more difficult to access..
-----------------
watch first 15second where the guy struggles with getting access to the ports :rolleyesagain:
YouTube: video
right.. that's why i said we see things differently..
i think it's good to put strong emphasis on aesthetics when designing something.. you- not so much.
no biggie
How does Premiere run on it compared to a Windows based pc using the same processors, RAM and top of the line video card setup?
The box should be the last thing to worry about with a computer.
This is gonna seem like a really dumb question, but why don't you all turn it around so the ports are within easy reach?
From what I have heard from a friend of mine who is heavily invested in CGI (working on hollywood blockbusters) this is not quite the machine many pro users have waited for. They asked for a smaller machine that is massively faster and what they got was a massively smaller machine that is just a bit faster.
Why? It might be a year before Adobe revamps their software for this machine, and that's assuming they are. Am I just supposed to drop frames like on an iMac and pretend I'm getting better results than I am?
Why? It might be a year before Adobe revamps their software for this machine, and that's assuming they are. Am I just supposed to drop frames like on an iMac and pretend I'm getting better results than I am?
The previous Mac Pro also has ports on the front.