Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Be careful with the use of “everyone”. Back when it was all iMac and no display for the Mac Mini, “everyone” wanted Apple to bring out a two-box solution.

Combining the 21.5 and 27 much iMac’s into one 24 inch solution for casual users, and a 27” display with two (not counting Mac Pro) options for the computer for power users, is a perfectly valid and sensible product lineup, in a segment that is in decline. We can all agree that the pricing is tough, but that is a different discussion.

Yep. I despise all in ones. It was ridiculous my only choices were the crappy Mac mini. Geez that thing was awful. Or the ridiculous costly 2019 Mac Pro.
 
Not with these RAM and SSD prices.
Yeah, pricing on the base M3 Macs is atrocious. By the time you upgrade the iMac to have a sane amount of RAM and storage (16/512) you're looking at $400 extra dollars. Adding another 8 GB to the M3 14" MacBook Pro makes it only $300 less than the 11-core version of the M3 Pro model, which has a whole lot of extra performance and external connectivity plus another 2 GB of RAM. They really don't want you to buy an M3 computer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I certainly hope Apple flips their focus. M1 is already good enough for even light Professional use cases. Apple needs to focus more on the high end. It’s quite ridiculous that the best of the best is the Ultra SoC as it is today. I have both M1 Ultra and M2 Ultra but still there needs to be something better. Stop focusing on the lowest of the low as you still don’t have an answer for the 2019 Mac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnmarki
My M1 MBA is so very nice, but 13” is a bit rough on my eyes. The power eclipses my still-daily driver (and physically falling apart) 2013 MBP.

The 16” M3 Max MBP, which is overkill for my needs, is definitely the machine to carry me through the next 10 years.

All that said, it does feel like Tim needs to go. A visionary, he is not. An idea man, he is not. Messy product lines and naming conventions. ****, even Schiller was naming an iPhone model XR “because it sounds like a car model.” Someone with Steve’s vision AND temperament is needed, apparently.

As unexciting as all this is, many have short-term memory at best (“Hi! I’m Tom!”). Intel mobile CPU iterations over the last decade were pretty abysmal. The M1 was a huge leap (the revolution) and now the evolution of the chip happens for the foreseeable future.

The i7-4960HQ was in the top of the line 2013 MBP. Has a multiple core score of 6598. How many of you ran out to buy the 2014 i7-4980HQ, with an amazing score of 6626?

Of course, perception is reality. The perception is that Apple is stagnant…
Vision Pro is coming! Something new for apple fans to get excited about and try. :)
 
My M1 MBA is so very nice, but 13” is a bit rough on my eyes. The power eclipses my still-daily driver (and physically falling apart) 2013 MBP.

The 16” M3 Max MBP, which is overkill for my needs, is definitely the machine to carry me through the next 10 years.

All that said, it does feel like Tim needs to go. A visionary, he is not. An idea man, he is not. Messy product lines and naming conventions. ****, even Schiller was naming an iPhone model XR “because it sounds like a car model.” Someone with Steve’s vision AND temperament is needed, apparently.

As unexciting as all this is, many have short-term memory at best (“Hi! I’m Tom!”). Intel mobile CPU iterations over the last decade were pretty abysmal. The M1 was a huge leap (the revolution) and now the evolution of the chip happens for the foreseeable future.

The i7-4960HQ was in the top of the line 2013 MBP. Has a multiple core score of 6598. How many of you ran out to buy the 2014 i7-4980HQ, with an amazing score of 6626?

Of course, perception is reality. The perception is that Apple is stagnant…
How about the 15" MBA? that gives you almost the screen size of the MBP at about half the price. If you can hold out to next spring/summer for an M3 upgrade to it, that might be a good choice.
 
It’s going to be super close.

M1Pro 10 core 12,206
M2Pro 10 core 12,103
M3Pro 11 core ???

It’s pretty lame if an 11 core M3 doesn’t significantly beat a 2 generation older chip with 10 cores.

This is misleading.

The 10-core M1 Pro has 8/2.
The 10-core M2 Pro has 6/4. So it achieves the same result while drawing less power.
The 11-core M3 Pro has 5/6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Apple's business model is to drive revenue growth by giving you incremental updates in terms of performance and features (Apple Silicone Transition aside) and significantly increase pricing for those updates. I don't think that is a winning strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokkus76
I'm skeptical. The prices are very high, the upsells are aggressive and I'm not sure the value proposition is strong enough because of that.

They'll do well, obviously. But enough to stop the downtrend? Not sure about that.

Mac sales were up 12% from last quarter.
 
When many of your existing customers tell you that the 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage (that has been shipping as default on many of your products for the last decade) is too low a starting point, you should listen.
Ignoring them only frustrates an otherwise loyal customer base.
Apple have been doing this for years now with everything from the base Mac Pro to the base iMac now effectively under specced and the up sell to the next level extortionate.
No surprise to see this decline, I'm just surprised it's taken this long to happen.
Apple have always been more expensive than PCs, but they were always good value.
That's no longer the case IMO.
An entirely non user upgradable, non expandable product range is rather limiting to say the least and so they 'hobble' their capabilities to create false differences.
They got away with it for a long time too.

Upgrade pricing for RAM and SSD storage isn't what's mainly driving slowdown of Mac revenue.

The reported quarter was better than the two previous quarters:

Q1: 7.7
Q2: 7.2
Q3: 6.8
Q4: 7.6
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Kim
When the Airs start with a base 16/512 config, they'll have a new wave of sales. It sucks that it costs a fortune to upgrade from 8/256 to 16/1tb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokkus76
Look through this thread... on a site devoted to Apple, frequented by Apple fans who will passionately defend any Apple moves, even at their own expense. What percentage of people in this thread seem to be near that point?

If MacRumors commenters were representative of Apple customer base, Apple would be the worst computer company in human history.

My girlfriend's youngest daughter is 19 and has used Apple products at least 10 years. Just a few days ago:

Me: You need Apple earphones with a Lightning cable for it to work with your iPhone
Her: Lightning??? What's that?
Me: The end of the cable shouldn't be round
Her: I see

she is the new Apple customer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
People are just unhappy that a $1600 pro laptop comes with just 8 GB of RAM and one external monitor support.

And yet, so many of them complain about the base configuration instead of complaining about the price for their configuration.
 
Boy that sounds really awful… oh wait

The 8/256 M2 was $1299 while the 8/512 M2 was $1499 so Apple only increased the price by $100.

And for that extra $100 you get a much better screen (larger, brighter, higher res, mini-LED, HDR-capable, etc), better speakers, fn keys instead of touchbar, a larger battery, SD and HDMI slots, more powerful charging brick, fast charge capable, MagSafe, and a faster chip.

I can’t believe how stingy Apple is. /s
You don’t get SD and HDMI slots. They made a special 2 port + MagSafe case for this model.
 
256GB storage for a computer going into 2024 is more criminal. After system files, apps etc there’ll be paltry amounts of storage left.

But who cares when there’s iCloud that will likely be bumped up to $40/month for a decent tier in 2025.:p:mad:

I'm using a M2 MBA with 256 Gb.

I have one Windows virtual machine, my iCloud Photo Library is about 200-300 Gb and my iCloud storage usage is about 400 Gb.

I have 143 Gb free space on my MBA.
 
You don’t get SD and HDMI slots. They made a special 2 port + MagSafe case for this model.
Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 3.41.49 PM.png

Screenshot 2023-11-03 at 4.02.21 PM.png
 
Last edited:
If MacRumors commenters were representative of Apple customer base, Apple would be the worst computer company in human history.

My girlfriend's youngest daughter is 19 and has used Apple products at least 10 years. Just a few days ago:

Me: You need Apple earphones with a Lightning cable for it to work with your iPhone
Her: Lightning??? What's that?
Me: The end of the cable shouldn't be round
Her: I see

she is the new Apple customer.

Buy her NOT-Apple earphones for pennies on the dollar and tell her it's Apple. ;)

And then make sure she gets a lucrative degree, so she can afford to pay any price for Apple stuff when margins grow on to what: 55-60% in about 4+ more years?

As to representative, the point seems missed. MR is an Apple enthusiast site. Yes, it certainly draws in some Anti-Apple people too. But if you hang here, you probably aren't doing it solely to waste time talking about a topic of no interest.

If this crowd is generally very PRO Apple- and I certainly think it is- and this crowd is finding lots of faults with ever-rising prices, ever-rising margin, seemingly important features being cut in new generations and nickel & diming- while nothing completely new in the Appleverse- I don't think I'm the only person seeing it at a greater level than ever before.

Consumer frustrations- especially accumulating frustration- drives consumer defection.​

Taking the concept to a micro, personal level, for the first time in well over a decade, I purchased a PC for "old fashioned bootcamp." And in getting the one I wanted I re-discovered costs like 8TB of SSD ($750 vs. Apples upgrade price of $2200) and 32GB of RAM ($100 vs. $600 for Apples upgrade price), etc. In fact, I purchased an entire gaming PC for less than Apple's 8TB SSD upgrade price... and equipped it with 10TB of SSD.

My old MB was failing due to old battery. So I wanted to give Apple too much money for the new MBair 15"... until I configured it as I wanted it and found pricing well in excess of MBpro. That revised my considerations back towards another MBpro... and then ultimately led me to choosing not to FARRRRRRRRR overpay for RAM & SSD ugrades but just put a $55 new battery in my old MB and ride it another year or two.

Furthermore, those 2 experiences together have me thinking that if RAM & SSD relative pricing doesn't significantly improve over the next 2 years, my next laptop may be a Windows PC... something I wouldn't even have considered 5+ years ago.

The point: accumulated goodwill will help motivate overpaying the premium to stick with the beloved platform for some amount of time as long as the goodwill is regularly recharged. How does Apple do that? Throw customer value some bones instead of seemingly making every decision for shareholders. Else, "could not even consider PC" Apple people can be moved to reconsider. And shareholders can't enjoy "another record quarter of profit" without consumers buying lots of Apple stuff.

Apple customers don't need shareholders at all. But that doesn't work the other way.
Apple fans can read such comments and basically say "See ya..." but that won't work for Apple if MANY ever start questioning why RAM costs about 3X-5X market, why SSD can be 3X-5X market, etc. Eventually, even fools wake up to wanting (or needing) more for their money. And then the true benefits have a much greater burden to overcome very tangible negatives. Again, 5 years ago, I wouldn't even consider a Windows laptop. Over the next 2 years while I stretch this old MBpro, I'm thinking about it. And in 2 years, I will not pay these markups- or more- for M5 RAM & SSD. Is that just me? Maybe. But I don't think I read that between the lines of MANY fan posts.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.