the_mole1314 said:Tell me when they give me 2 gigs for email and storage and I'll look into .mac.
psxndc said:Now if Apple could find some way to integrate it all, that could be compelling. Like a 1-stop shop for it all. As it is currently presented, .mac is a hodgepodge of different features, none of which really stand on their own.
Right, but it includes broadband access. So factor in how much broadband is and then redue your calculations.MacPhreak said:But that's $43 per MONTH, right? For a grand total of $516 per year. Vs $8.25 a month with .mac.
As always, my 2¢.
Elan0204 said:It's interesting that this announcement came right after the big September renewal period. From reading through this thread, it looks like a few of you decided not to renew. Maybe Apple was losing a lot of .Mac subscribers, so they made this quick increase in storage as a way to hopefully slow the bleeding.
True. You're right in that it is a monthly charge. However, $516 per year gets me internet access and 7x the online storage space. You've got to have internet access anyway to use .Mac. Given the features my ISP provides as part of their regular internet access, would I tack on an extra $100 (or $8.25/month) for .Mac?MacPhreak said:But that's $43 per MONTH, right? For a grand total of $516 per year. Vs $8.25 a month with .mac.
As always, my 2¢.
pgwalsh said:Right, but it includes broadband access. So factor in how much broadband is and then redue your calculations.
DELKIN said:I use .mac and find the integration with the many apple programs nice. One thing I really wish they would increase is the size of emails allowed. They have this capped below 4meg per email and it sucks becasue you can't send a high res photo. I have inquired about increasing the amount and they don't offer any options there. I am still a subscriber and will remain so but as nice as the storage increase is I wish they would have addressed this issue.
Ho Train said:hmmm...more space...I like.
It drives me nuts to hear people compare .mac with things like g-mail. In my opinion, you need to compare apples with apples. Sure, .Mac only provides you with 250 mb of webspace, but the functionality that I get with .Mac (posting pictures, movies, journals) and the ease of use (making webpages has never been easier in my opinion). I could find cheaper alternatives but those alternatives usually involves a little bit more elbow grease to get things running.
And honestly...what am I going to do with 1000MB of webspace that I can't do with 250 MB? OOO...I know...I'll upload a DVD rip of Nemo...
psxndc said:Storage? 250MB? No offense, but I can buy that in a KEYCHAIN.
Fukui said:Nice. Now maybe some day they'll get it up to 1GB...
I'm happy. 🙂
j_maddison said:Seeing as you like to compare Apples to Apples, just thought I'd help keep you being a nut! joke 🙂
Spymac offer 3Gig of e mail storage and many of the sync functions of isync, you also get 250mb of online storage as standard (idisk type service),and you get blogging (personally not a fan of blogging, but some people like it). So pretty much the only thing you lose is the ability to publish a .mac website (which doesnt interest me in the slightest), and for me being a uk person, i dont get so annoyed all the USA only offers that Apple are keen to advertise on their .mac homepage 🙂 OH and it costs an extortionate $39.99 a year! Now how do you like them Apples 😛
jay