No I'm saying there is a value disconnect, though with Apple that is often the case. There is always value but sometimes not as good as it could be given their pricing. What I am saying is that for the spec difference the regular Mini seems over priced considering the major spec jump for the Studio. And I would argue that the Studio is priced reasonably, so the regular Mini does seem overprice. However, if we were to assign a value to Mac OS and to the Apple brand, and to take those 2 dollar figures out of each offering, say at $600 combined, then the Mini is $500 for a nameless box without an OS and the Studio is $1400 by the same rationale, then the Mini doesn't seem as overpriced.I had to read your post multiple times to see if I misunderstood it, but nope, you are saying paying 82% more is better because of better specs even if you don't need them. Of course you would get better specs if you pay more!