Did anyone own the 2010 MBA prior to the 2013?
Is the Intel 5000 any better in comparison? The old dedicated 320M absolutely burns the 4000 chip in real gaming scenarios, complex scenes went from relatively smooth on the 320M to unplayable on the 4000 ('12 MBA). I think the '11 MBA would be as solid downgrade from the '10. The benchmark results are a bit deceiving I found, either that or I looked at the numbers too casually and assumed they told the whole story.
I wouldn't want to get a 2013 and discover it's still not decently better than the 320M. Anyone who has / had both that can comment? Wish they stuck with the dedicated chips, would make the current model way more enticing.
I have the 320M (and am currently selling on eBay) as well as a recently purchased 2013 Core i5 1.3Ghz with Turbo Boost and the Intel HD 5000. I don't have the Cinebench scores in front of me, but from what I recall the CPU and OpenGL scores were significantly better by at least 25%. The CPU test of the Core i5 seemed to finish in about half the time of the Intel C2D.
I do recall the average frame rate for Tomb Raider via the benchmark options:
MBA 2010 with 320M: 18.5
MBA 2013 HD 5000: 22.5
That's all I've tested so far...