They should have just added the firewire port in addition to the existing ports and then brought out their own Superdrive. 1 firewire port wouldn't have hurt + you can daisy chain with it.
I can think of a few reasons that people might prefer an external Apple SuperDrive, if it worked on other Macs:This is a non-issue. I mean is there another Mac out there that needs this accessory?
It's just as I suspected. It's the same as the iMac Aluminium. Way to to adhere to USB standards Apple.
They should have just added the firewire port in addition to the existing ports and then brought out their own Superdrive. 1 firewire port wouldn't have hurt + you can daisy chain with it.
They should have just added the firewire port in addition to the existing ports and then brought out their own Superdrive. 1 firewire port wouldn't have hurt + you can daisy chain with it.
It's just as I suspected. It's the same as the iMac Aluminium. Way to to adhere to USB standards Apple.
In both cases, the devices DO fully adhere to standards. They also add additional abilities. It's not exactly a contradiction, though it might seem so at first glance.It's just as I suspected. It's the same as the iMac Aluminium. Way to to adhere to USB standards Apple.
There's only one USB port. Two cables wouldn't be a solution. That said, it doesn't matter where the additional power comes from to the drive. An adapter or specially designed hub could pull off the same trick (or a splitter to use two USB ports, as long as the second port had a little bit of logic to it to request power only). Someone will work it out if there's enough interest...or people can simply use one of the other external drives that are out there.Apple is designing hardware to use their above-spec USB ports instead of using two USB cables. That's my gripe. One cable looks nice, looks.
What's the difference between intel iMacs and my iMac G5? Do intel iMacs "knowingly" supply more power to the Al keyboard specifically, or are they simply capable of supplying more power in general?Instead of largely unpowered keyboard ports (the norm, good for a few flash drives, a mouse, and not much else), the new iMac pushes power to the keyboard so you can charge your iPod. It works as a normal USB device in all other circumstances.
Only if the device requests more power than it can handle in the handshake. This would be a bad design.I wonder, could there be any ramifications for supplying more power than the standard recommends? ...Like frying a device?
Both. The USB controllers know that there is more power (though not necessarily more than USB spec in the case of the iMac), and the keyboard knows that it can act as an intermediary and request more power on behalf of peripherals that are attached to its ports.What's the difference between intel iMacs and my iMac G5? Do intel iMacs "knowingly" supply more power to the Al keyboard specifically, or are they simply capable of supplying more power in general?