His point is that we shouldn't have to avoid using normal software, f** around with Activity Monitor, etc. just to get the Apple-quoted 10-hour battery life. I'm at 6 hours which isn't even close. If it were just me, that would be one thing, but the Verge review tested two separate units and had the same result.
You actually had one in your hands. Why did you make a video that so closely resembles an Apple ad or keynote? I can just go to Apple's website for that kind of content.
You could have shown us:
- How far the screen tilts back (but instead you just showed us the cosmetic improvement of the rear end's color scheme)
- How loud the keys are (a big area of dispute)
- How loud the speakers are (instead of blasting a pop song over the video's audio channel in the beginning)
- How amazingly light the machine is—so much so that apparently you were holding it atop the fingers of one hand
- All sorts of aspects of the machine (as you did in the amazing unboxing section), instead of a talking head delivering information verbally for minutes on end
- Close-ups of the TouchBar
The other aspects of your video that are completely perplexing:
Your video reminds me a lot of this new machine: mostly bling, dumb design choices, vacuous or completely absent content. The disputed issues remain, and you barely addressed half of them: only ports for USB-C, a standard barely out of the gate, when there is plenty of room along the side of the machine for USB-B, Firewire, Ethernet, MagSafe; 2TB only as a special option; a paltry 16GB RAM; a too-large trackpad that is causing plenty of users grief; a useless new piece of UI that isn't even hi-res, that being the TouchBar. The product, like your video, is very pretty, but substantially lacking in the areas that count.
- You made a high-res video, but chose to shoot it in a room with so little light that you couldn't use a depth of field that would put everything in focus (and additionally, you chose to put your face in focus, rather than the product you were reviewing!)
- Why did you spend so much time going over things that most of us already know about (the need for dongles, the fact that the AC brick doesn't come with the extension cord, the replacement of the lit-up Apple logo with a mirrored logo)?
- Reliance on short, hardware demo snippets (apparently) from Apple showing "exploded-view" aspects of functionality rather than putting your own mind, hands, creativity, and cinematography chops to work to deliver original review content
Played with the TB at the Apple Store today. It's neat in concept but overall I can't see how it would make my workflow better except maybe in FCPX. I liked the FCPX controlls very much, especially scrubing. It's great with Safari too navigating tabs, especially if you are like me and your pages and tabs get lost in the crowd.
But then there were the mundane things like adjusting sound or brightness which seemed to overcomplicate a simple task. For example, with a non-TB Mac to adjust brightness you just press the brightness key untill you get the brightness you want. Pretty quick and easy. With the TB Mac you have to press the virtual brightness key (or the key to get to that screen) then adjust. That is one or two clicks then a swipe to adjust. So it's cool looking but not faster or easier.
Similar in an app like Pages (I don't normally use Pages, but assume Word will have similar workflow when updated). You can bold, ital, set headers and footers from the TB. Again futuristic looking but you have to take your eyes off the screen and then futz around for what you are looking for. For me it's easier to just use the ribbon with major formatting options visible at a glance or a key shortcut.
Apple bases their battery life on using Apple software. It's not reasonable to conclude that you'll get that with whatever third-party stuff you install. I mean, you've got a lot of stuff installed. Dropbox is notorious for constantly scanning stuff in the background, for instance. Apple can't be responsible for all the badly-written code out there. If I was you, I'd uninstall all of that third-party stuff in your menubar until the kernel_task starts going down to something normal.
But then there were the mundane things like adjusting sound or brightness which seemed to overcomplicate a simple task. For example, with a non-TB Mac to adjust brightness you just press the brightness key untill you get the brightness you want. Pretty quick and easy. With the TB Mac you have to press the virtual brightness key (or the key to get to that screen) then adjust. That is one or two clicks then a swipe to adjust. So it's cool looking but not faster or easier.
Played with the TB at the Apple Store today. It's neat in concept but overall I can't see how it would make my workflow better except maybe in FCPX. I liked the FCPX controlls very much, especially scrubing. It's great with Safari too navigating tabs, especially if you are like me and your pages and tabs get lost in the crowd.
But then there were the mundane things like adjusting sound or brightness which seemed to overcomplicate a simple task. For example, with a non-TB Mac to adjust brightness you just press the brightness key untill you get the brightness you want. Pretty quick and easy. With the TB Mac you have to press the virtual brightness key (or the key to get to that screen) then adjust. That is one or two clicks then a swipe to adjust. So it's cool looking but not faster or easier.
Similar in an app like Pages (I don't normally use Pages, but assume Word will have similar workflow when updated). You can bold, ital, set headers and footers from the TB. Again futuristic looking but you have to take your eyes off the screen and then futz around for what you are looking for. For me it's easier to just use the ribbon with major formatting options visible at a glance or a key shortcut.
Honestly, as soon as we can build our .Net stack on macOS/Linux (via .net core), I'm dumping parallels and windows for good.
You're kidding, right?
Do you honestly think Apple sells a pro level computer expecting people to only run Apple software on it? Do you think that Apple employees do not use non-Apple software? Why does Apple demo Photoshop and other software from other developers if they don't expect people to use it?
Your point is irrelevant anyways for the reasons already mentioned: people who have the 13" non-TB version are getting 10+ hours with their non-Apple software. And I myself get 11 hours with my 3 year-old MBA using the same combination of software.
played with my 13inch TB pro the last couple of days. battery was at 5-6 hours for the first two days, been getting a solid 10-11 hours recently. people just doesnt understand the need of a burn in and indexing. face palm.
.
I had my 15" for about a day and half now. I've written a review on my blog
http://www.mactip.net/macbook-pro-15-touch-bar-unboxing-review-2016/
TL,DR
- Dongles, dongles...
- I miss the SD card slot more than I thought I would.
- Touch bar is going to need time to become truly useful.
Very happy to hear this, it gives me hope.
[doublepost=1479348080][/doublepost]
What kind of battery life are you seeing with the 15"?
About 8 hours is probably typical. Right now I'm am just browsing the web with 10 Chrome tabs at 98% battery, and it's telling me 9 hours remaining. Ten hours *might* be possible with safari.
meanwhile, you can still use the free virtualbox!.
The Mac and Linux version of .Net Core are already at version 1.1. There is also a docker image.. It should work perfectly.
You're kidding, right?
Do you honestly think Apple sells a pro level computer expecting people to only run Apple software on it? Do you think that Apple employees do not use non-Apple software? Why does Apple demo Photoshop and other software from other developers if they don't expect people to use it?
Your point is irrelevant anyways for the reasons already mentioned: people who have the 13" non-TB version are getting 10+ hours with their non-Apple software. And I myself get 11 hours with my 3 year-old MBA using the same combination of software.
Played with the TB at the Apple Store today. It's neat in concept but overall I can't see how it would make my workflow better except maybe in FCPX. I liked the FCPX controlls very much, especially scrubing. It's great with Safari too navigating tabs, especially if you are like me and your pages and tabs get lost in the crowd.
But then there were the mundane things like adjusting sound or brightness which seemed to overcomplicate a simple task. For example, with a non-TB Mac to adjust brightness you just press the brightness key untill you get the brightness you want. Pretty quick and easy. With the TB Mac you have to press the virtual brightness key (or the key to get to that screen) then adjust. That is one or two clicks then a swipe to adjust. So it's cool looking but not faster or easier.
Similar in an app like Pages (I don't normally use Pages, but assume Word will have similar workflow when updated). You can bold, ital, set headers and footers from the TB. Again futuristic looking but you have to take your eyes off the screen and then futz around for what you are looking for. For me it's easier to just use the ribbon with major formatting options visible at a glance or a key shortcut.
Awesome, very glad to know thatI found a way to make changing brightness/volume a one press process: just hold the brightness/volume button and the slider will appear. Keep your finger on the TB and scrub left/right accordingly.
Can some of you guys who are testing and reporting battery life install Battery Logger so we can see exactly how long your MBP lasts without guestimates?
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/battery-logger/id473673114?mt=12
I am using Battery Health 2 to track battery life. It has similar features to Battery Logger, I think.
tMBP 13". On my third charge. I've used it for 3:27, and battery is at 52% and says 3:10 remaining. So on track for just just over 6.5 hours, which is very close to my previous two cycles—and also relatively consistent with the Verge review, where they said they never broke 7 hours.
Thanks that is a good indicator but still not accurate as the estimates are useless.
Does battery health show you a history log?
With battery logger you can see a history of all the time the laptop was active between the charger disconnecting and connecting again.
This should give us the most accurate readings even if your usage is split over several usage sessions as long as you don't plug it in at all.