You have to post your activitymonitor please, and please report stability. What did you pay for it?
What did you pay for it?
but dont the new MBP's use DDR3?
Activity Monitor Screenshot
Stabilty is wonderfull, no craches everyting is fast.
I'm quite positive that 8 gb will work too. Of course it needs a test first.
![]()
Refer to this post. We have done many tests, 8GB fails in terms of OS using the full 8GB properly.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/573906/
I love how all these people for the past year said that 4 GB was the max. I bought 2 4GB SO_DIMM chips from newegg and just installed last night. Leopard will only read 6 GB, but thats 6GB! not 4.
And logic is running 36 tracks better than ever.
thanks newegg. 299.00 for 8 GB is smashing.
PS. has everyone seen the benchmarks on the new MBP's? Looks like im staying with mine for a while longer until the new processors are implemented. There is almost no proformance difference between the mbp 4,1 and the new "brick", in some cases the mbp 4,1 still out preformed.
You can install 8GB of DDR2 in a 2008 (Non-Unibody) Macbook Pro. I've done it and I've also done 6GB. 8GB, although possible and your system will recognize it, is rather unstable. From my experience, 6GB is pretty solid. I can't honestly say it made a difference though. I used two 4GB Samsung modules and I found my system lagged, stalled and beach balled on just about every application. When I went back to 6GB, those problems stopped. Running on both configurations, I've never come close to hitting the 4GB usage level and I really don't see any advantage to exceeding 4GB.
I just received a 4 gb DDR2 module from G.Skill and this works fine in aMacbook pro 2.4 Core2 Duo.
I'm thinking about ordering a second one to make up for 8 in total!
![]()