MacBook Pros not coming out any time soon

[lifeguard90]

could be, know one knows nor was apple telling anyone that the next mbp 100% had to have sandy bridge. They could do an update soon, and then a late year one as well to implement it once all the quirks are out/ or wait for ivy. They could make 2.8ghz standard instead of a BTO, add lots of flash memory, better gpu, simmer etc. A refresh of decent significance in theory still makes sense and is possible. Guess well find out,

 

[altecXP]

Isn't the Intel bug only with SATAII ports? If so then why can't they just make laptop boards using SATAIII ports. You only ned 2 of those.

 

[SwedishBassist]

Yup, this is correct. Maybe Apple will stick with the current CPU's and make SSD standard across the board.

I'd take that and a dedicated GPU in the 13" over a new processor every day of the week.

 

[lifeguard90]

same. sandy bridge is better, thats how each generation is, but overall its not a mega leap like the current core i processors are over core duo and core 2 duo.


is it possible apple may actually use AMD fusion chips and not SB?

 

[SwedishBassist]

I mean, it's not like the MBP is underpowered. At least not for my needs.

 

[d-boy86]

Who cares. The Macbook Pro's will only see a speck update. Not a redesign. No one will really notice the difference anyway.

 

[Cheerwino]

It's such a waste and such a shame that even on these forums people are too egocentric and lazy to read the forum first before posting a new topic and realizing that there is already a topic with 5 pages going on about this subject.
Too bad I thought Apple users were different....

Passive aggressive much?