Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Costs about $300 or so dollars for the full 8gb upgrade. Can't remember the site, but it has been talked about on here for a while now.

that $300 is for the last gen mbp i have not seen 1X4 gb ddr3 anywhere which is probably why apple states 4gb is max.
 
Good to see the RAM ceiling put up to 8GB for those who can afford/need it. Personally, I would be delighted with just 4GB :cool:.

The new MBP might turn into quite the speed demon. No wonder the previous gen models are at firesale prices.
 
Curious why this feature wasn't ready to go on launch day:confused:

I could not agree MORE...

If Apple wanted to really impress the pros they should have had the features already in place. As well, since a lot of users are reporting problems, it seems that maybe Apple released these products too early...

I was gonna buy a new MacBook at the end of December but now I will see what Apple does for the MacBook Pro...

Maybe they are waiting to release the 17" to enable those features... but again, why wait?
 
that $300 is for the last gen mbp i have not seen 1X4 gb ddr3 anywhere which is probably why apple states 4gb is max.

Prices for DDR2 are pretty cheap: $70 for 2 x 2GB modules. You are right in that 4GB DDR3 chips aren't around yet, but given that 2 x 2GB DDR3 is $150, I'd imagine the 4GB chips would be at least that. My guess is that 8GB (2 x 4GB OEM) will cost ~$400 out of the gate, perhaps less. Still, not *that* bad considering that it's new tech and a ton of RAM.
 
I could not agree MORE...

If Apple wanted to really impress the pros they should have had the features already in place. As well, since a lot of users are reporting problems, it seems that maybe Apple released these products too early...

I was gonna buy a new MacBook at the end of December but now I will see what Apple does for the MacBook Pro...

Maybe they are waiting to release the 17" to enable those features... but again, why wait?

I hate to be cynical, but I suspect Apple is doing its usual slow roll-out of features, holding back to reserve a feature as bait later on (bait to get people to shell out more money somehow). The "activation" of these benefits will end up costing money.
 
Lol, there are sli (two gpu) windows laptops available for a couple of years already. Not to mention discrete + dedicated GPU were also available for some time on windows laptops bro.

haha true :D but I'll never again buy a windows laptop. :p I learned the hard way... now it's :apple: all the way :D
 
I hate to be cynical, but I suspect Apple is doing its usual slow roll-out of features, holding back to reserve a feature as bait later on (bait to get people to shell out more money somehow). The "activation" of these benefits will end up costing money.
I don't want another 802.11n game again.

it is actually cheaper than i thought i figured $1600 for the 8 gb so 1200 is not bad. i would wait tell the prices drop a lot.
It was ~$700 per stick just a few weeks ago.
 
I'ts probably irrelevant to most here :rolleyes:

But technically speaking, Products like Fusion and Parallels might be able to use one of the graphics chips and run a virtual window native without any emulation (except for sound; I'f im correct)

Might be kind of nice to really have this virtual thing work this way (considering I paid real money for it) :D
 
I'ts probably irrelevant to most here :rolleyes:

But technically speaking, Products like Fusion and Parallels might be able to use one of the graphics chips and run a virtual window native without any emulation (except for sound; I'f im correct)

Might be kind of nice to really have this virtual thing work this way (considering I paid real money for it) :D
The virtual GPU is still a virtual GPU. They're getting better at using hardware acceleration but the virtual OS still isn't completely, directly interacting with the real GPU.
 
Why is this article about the MacBook Pro alone, when the MacBook also uses that very same chipset?
 
When we say Apple will ultimately allow us to use both at once, I think that is more likely to take the form of one GPU acting normally and another as a OpenCL device.

I don't expect they would enable the two GPUs to act as one in an SLI type arrangement. That would seem like a massive driver effort.

The fast switching will surely be coming, maybe even before 10.6
 
When we say Apple will ultimately allow us to use both at once, I think that is more likely to take the form of one GPU acting normally and another as a OpenCL device.

I don't expect they would enable the two GPUs to act as one in an SLI type arrangement. That would seem like a massive driver effort.

I would actually prefer this arrangement, as I would be doing much more video encoding than gaming (in fact, I wouldn't be gaming at all). Have one GPU drive the display and help out OpenCL when needed, have the other crunch numbers.

I wonder what running 2 GPUs will do to the energy consumption though, especially for a laptop.
 
I would actually prefer this arrangement, as I would be doing much more video encoding than gaming (in fact, I wouldn't be gaming at all). Have one GPU drive the display and help out OpenCL when needed, have the other crunch numbers.

I wonder what running 2 GPUs will do to the energy consumption though, especially for a laptop.

Actually, I think heat is more of an issue. Per the images posted up by iFixit, the three chips (CPU and both graphics chips) are in somewhat close proximity of each other.

image.php
 
Aren't we supposed tobise 200 pin and not 204, which these are?
DDR3 SODIMMs are 204-pin.

Actually, I think heat is more of an issue. Per the images posted up by iFixit, the three chips (CPU and both graphics chips) are in somewhat close proximity of each other
More then that! They share the same heatpipe and exhaust system. Keep in mind the chipset is going to heat up as well under high CPU load anyways.
 
The MacBook should support 8 GB alongside the MacBook Pro. Since it's only using the 9400M G it doesn't support Dual GPU grahpics boost.

I was talking about the chipset, not the GPU. So of course the GPU-related stuff is for MBP-only, but I was referring to support of 8GB of RAM.
 
Actually, I think heat is more of an issue. Per the images posted up by iFixit, the three chips (CPU and both graphics chips) are in somewhat close proximity of each other.

image.php

Good call, I didn't even think of that! I wonder if the heat issues will mean relegating the dual GPU feature to desktops, then?
 
Much RAM

ok, unless you are a NASA scientist, i really doubt that you'll be using 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM....buy hey you never know
 
Good call, I didn't even think of that! I wonder if the heat issues will mean relegating the dual GPU feature to desktops, then?
Once again it's the same situation on the iMac as well.

http://www.kodawarisan.com/imac_2007_mid/imac_2007_mid_02.html

ok, unless you are a NASA scientist, i really doubt that you'll be using 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM....buy hey you never know
You should see what a PC desktop can do with four slots of DDR2-800. There are quite a few consumer towers that ship with quad cores and 6-8 GB of RAM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.