What a silly response, completely missing my point, using hyperbole to try and exaggerate what I said to make me look stupid, and then the typical 'spend more and get over it' closer.
I never stated it should have 'everything' the pro has, and you know that. But better to debate a straw man you invented, than a rational argument. The pro still retains the advantage of a completely different look, unibody aluminum, edge-to-edge glass, backlit keyboard, both thinner and lighter, firewire, and should be higher specced (cpu/hdd) by default (but isn't). Also, if we are to believe nitial reports, the pro screens are still better. I think thats enough different to justify the $200 difference in pricetag. SD didnt need to be on the chopping block, since I believe its one of those features that should be unified across their entire computer line. Like I said, my sister's $299 netbook has one. One can argue firewireis more of a 'pro' feature, thats not the case with SD.
My point stands, thats its a cheap trick at differentiation, that they really didnt need to pull. This doesnt directly affect me- I have a 15' pro. I just think they shoud have added SD to their list of standard features like bluetooth, wifi, USB ports, etc.
Its even worse with IR. Controlling itunes by remote falls under 'pro' now? Come on. They also lost tons of potential sales of their remote by chopping this one off, a very odd and cynical move.