Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How much did Apple pay you for that domain name?

Could someone make a living out of doing that?

did they pay hundreds, thousands, millions???

I am sincerely curious.

If you tried to do that, you would be acting in "bad faith", which means Apple can take you to court, will get the domain name handed over to them, and you will be stuffed with the court costs.

As a horrific example of things going seriously wrong, visit www.nissan.com .
 
It was registered based on a rumor. As far as I heard, Apple hadn't registered Macbook Air as a trademark when the domain was registered. If it isn't a trademark, it isn't Cybersquatting.

If it has "MacBook" in its name, then it is cybersquatting. In this case, it was just a bit of harmless fun. If someone tries to sell it for money, then the registration is made in bad faith and there is trouble.
 
If you tried to do that, you would be acting in "bad faith", which means Apple can take you to court, will get the domain name handed over to them, and you will be stuffed with the court costs.

As a horrific example of things going seriously wrong, visit www.nissan.com .

Completely different situations. The macbookair domain was registered based off rumors. Apple gave no indication they were making the product, nor did they have a trademark for it. MR had every right to purchase and resell the domain.

Nissan was a registered trademark of the car company prior to the nissan.com domain being registered. I believe the trademark was registered to the car company back in the 1950s.
 
If it has "MacBook" in its name, then it is cybersquatting. In this case, it was just a bit of harmless fun. If someone tries to sell it for money, then the registration is made in bad faith and there is trouble.

No it isn't. In order for it to be considered 'cybersquatting', macbookair must have been a registered trademark of Apple prior to the domain's existence. Legally, macbook != macbook air. Apple could try to bully you out of it, like they have with so many ipod products and domains, but there is no legal basis for it. If someone actually stood up to apple, the case would be thrown out.
 
So why did MR bother registering it then? Just to piss off Apple?

In the name of science
forscience.gif
 
No it isn't. In order for it to be considered 'cybersquatting', macbookair must have been a registered trademark of Apple prior to the domain's existence. Legally, macbook != macbook air. Apple could try to bully you out of it, like they have with so many ipod products and domains, but there is no legal basis for it. If someone actually stood up to apple, the case would be thrown out.

Which further supports an argument that MacRumors received compensation for the domain.
 
They didn't care and never bothered registering for the other mac lines as domain names, so why are you having a difficult time believing they heard through the usual channels that Arn would give it to them free of charge and they took advantage of it?
 
Which further supports an argument that MacRumors received compensation for the domain.

Not even in the slightest. Perhaps MR wanted to grab it before someone else, intending to do the nice thing and give it to Apple. Believe it or not, there are still some kind people out there.
 
For the most part, I'd venture to say that Apple doesn't buy domains. Anything that remotely includes trademarked products would be taken. Since macbookair.com contains macbook, Apple could simply threaten legal action.

You should have held out for a media pass for next year's Macworld. :D There is absolutely no reason why you shouldn't have received one this year. Your coverage was stellar and much appreciated.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.