Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
MacBooks Running Windows Gain Improved Trackpad Support With Boot Camp Update
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
What the Heck is so special about ARM and so much HATE for INTEL?
You can only Shrink a computer chip so much before it's over.
And you can only maximize Power per WATT before you run out of steam.
1 and 2nm chips wasting a high performance 5 or 7nm AMD or INTEL X86 chip???
I THINK NOT.
someones gonna run out of shrinkage and Steam. My BET, ARM.
All this back and forth about the T2 chip and security - I’m pretty sure the devs just didn’t feel like writing drivers for older versions of the touchpad, jeez. 3rd party developers have had no problem supporting the older trackpads with their windows precision touchpad drivers. Apple just didn’t do it for whatever reason, there is no technical limitation. Sure, the T2 may handle input in some way - that doesn’t mean they couldn’t write drivers for non-T2 versions as well, but they didn’t.
I don’t think it’s planned obsolescence, I think they just drew the line there for the amount of dev time they wanted to put into it.
I don’t think it’s planned obsolescence, I think they just drew the line there for the amount of dev time they wanted to put into it.
Last edited:
Agreed.
Just adding my two cents here, the Apple T2 chip is surely handling the built-in trackpad, if you have a T2 equipped Mac, head to > About This Mac > System Report... > Hardware > USB to see for yourself. It's not just a security chip to encrypt/decrypt storage and enable secure boot, it's also an overlord of all built-in I/O that connected to the USB bus, e.g. keyboard, trackpad,
However, that dosen't mean Intel Macs without the T2 chip couldn't have Microsoft Precision Touchpad drivers, when they're running Windows using Boot Camp, there's no actual hardware difference between them and other Windows laptops, which mostly have Precision Touchpad drivers at this point.
Apple have been ignoring Boot Camp users for a long time, to me it seems like there's only one developer (or a tiny team at best) inside Apple is responsible for writing, testing and distributing Boot Camp drivers – not even full-time, otherwise we should have gotten regular GPU driver updates rather than only one update per year.
So it is what it is. Maybe with the fully control of the T2 chip it's easier for this one-man team inside Apple to implement Precision Touchpad drivers for Boot Camp users, or maybe they somehow acknowledged third party Precision Touchpad drivers having issues on T2 equipped Macs so they decided to release an official one.
With more in-house silicons to be introduced down the road, I don't see why would Apple come back and add more Boot Camp drivers support for Intel Macs other than annual graphics drivers. If anyone needs Boot Camp for whatever reason, it's really the time to consider buying a second Windows machine.
Forget all the speculation about security and T2 with regards to the trackpad, all nonsense. Apple has a very simple reason to support only MacBooks with the T2 chips. These MacBooks use the USB bus to connect the internal trackpad and keyboard. The MacBooks before use the SPI bus and would need a different driver on Windows. (Note: Even older MacBooks about mid 2015 and earlier also use the USB bus).
So Apple is drawing the line to support only one Windows bus driver: The USB bus, which is much simpler to implement on Windows than a SPI driver. The T2 chip doesn't play a role at all, it's just a coincidence that all T2 MacBooks use the USB bus to connect the internal trackpad and keyboard.
Myth solved.
So Apple is drawing the line to support only one Windows bus driver: The USB bus, which is much simpler to implement on Windows than a SPI driver. The T2 chip doesn't play a role at all, it's just a coincidence that all T2 MacBooks use the USB bus to connect the internal trackpad and keyboard.
Myth solved.
I would bet instead that this is something that was never quite ready, but it's now as ready as it will ever get.
Well, Either its slow work in progress, or is ceased. At least VMWare may be going through fine, if not others.
desktop hypervisor Archives
boo-hoo.. for Mac guests. I mean who really uses Macn a VM right?
This is just Apple blatantly forcing people to buy Intel systems! Right after blatantly forcing people to buy M1 systems! At this rate, Apple could just keep releasing features for one and the other until everyone that owns a Mac has, like 17 systems! DON’T YOU SEE???
/s
Intel’s biggest problem is that there’s a very large complex section of the chip that does nothing more than decode instructions. While that means they are eminently backwards compatible, I wouldn’t doubt that a large part of their difficulty in shrinking is due to failures in this block. Apple, on the other hand, has been discarding blocks (like for 32-bit compatibility) and repurposing that space for other technologies. Apple’s less likely to run into Intel’s situation because the folks designing the future chips can talk directly to the folks in charge of the compiler, the OS and app delivery. If something’s not working at the chip level, they can all come together to figure out the way forward (because those chips are two years from test runs at least).