Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Everyone seems to be overthinking this. They will simply split out the apps and probably either have a "SYNC" button in each app for devices or a new SYNC app for the peasants who still choose to sync their device using a cord or for the 10 people that still use an old iPod.

Or they could to the nuclear option and completely kill all iPod support and wired syncing support.

But realistically they will probably have a sync app for older devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras and cflem
I remember the days when Mac OS updates were interesting. We talked about things like multitasking,

APFS


Swift

Quartz Extreme

Metal

Fast User Switching

Desktop Stacks

, Expose,

Continuity (Auto Unlock, Universal Clipboard, Handoff, Personal Hotspot, text message sync, AirDrop)

other GUI changes

Dark Mode

Siri, Purgeable Storage, Tabs, Night Shift, Notification Center.

Heck, Continuity alone is awesome. It took several releases to work reliably for me, but when it does, it's really awesome.

Keep in mind that early Mac OS X releases added many features in part because, well, they kind of lacked them. It wasn't until around 10.3 or 10.4 that all the essential features were there.
 
Everyone seems to be overthinking this. They will simply split out the apps and probably either have a "SYNC" button in each app for devices or a new SYNC app for the peasants who still choose to sync their device using a cord or for the 10 people that still use an old iPod.

Or they could to the nuclear option and completely kill all iPod support and wired syncing support.

But realistically they will probably have a sync app for older devices.

Why do you assume this is for older devices?

I don’t want my only backup to be in the cloud. I want control of my iPhone backups and don’t want to wait an eternity to upload/download my entire iPhone image from the cloud if I need to restore it.

Wireless and cloud is overrated.
 
I quite like the current Books app, and do not like the News app. Hoping this is incorrect.
 
Is there a reason the iTunes Music store and Apple Music have to be separate apps? I’d prefer it if you could just buy something right within Apple Music and album/song reviews/ratings would be right there as well. Is there really a reason for iTunes to exist on iOS?

Because Apple doesn't have the talent to keep it all working together? Just a guess...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki and NMBob
About time, iTunes is bloated joke. A convoluted unintuitive mess.
This should have happened years ago!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
Will the new music app inherit the itunes music library? Will it support iTunes Match?

Will the TV app inherit the iTunes video library?

Is homesharing (server) supported?

Will I end up having to keep iTunes running just for home sharing?

So many questions.
 
As long as it is fully functional. The current Marzipan apps seemed quite lazy and just simple ports of the iOS counterpart with no added desktop features.
It looks from the outside that Apple has been very lazy on all their offerings. I really hope it’s a for great things to come. Things they’ve been working on behind the curtains since 2012 and will blow us away. If not, I’m totally lost with this company and don’t understand where the money is going instead of investors and paying dividends.
 
So you’ll buy stuff in the iTunes app and it’ll transfer over to Music? Like I wonder how that’ll work.


I’m assuming we’ll still sync through iTunes for photos.
I wonder how that will work. Apple probably wants everyone to use iCloud to sync everything. For those who don't have enough iCloud storage, will people have to open iTunes to sync music, then open Photos to sync Photos, etc.? Or would they bring back iSync, or or something similar, to do all the syncing stuff? I have a boatload of music from CDs that isn't available on iTunes Music.
 
I'm sure they are keeping iTunes for people who manager their own music.

I would expect the Music App to be for Apple Music subscriptions only.

But that’s not how it works even on iOS, and the point of marZipan is to allow one app to run everywhere, so I’m at least hopeful.
 
So you’ll buy stuff in the iTunes app and it’ll transfer over to Music? Like I wonder how that’ll work.


I’m assuming we’ll still sync through iTunes for photos.

Syncing photos and other non-music data never made sense through an app called "iTunes" and which was once a music player only. My guess is that iTunes is killed off (finally!) in favor of purpose-driven apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
Make an app called Sync and take it out of iTunes. Leave iTunes for my stand alone music library and take everything else out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: justperry
About time, iTunes is bloated joke. A convoluted unintuitive mess.
This should have happened years ago!

People always say this but never articulate it.

You have sections for music, movies, tv shows, podcasts, and books. Each of those has your library and a store from which you can add to your library. Is that really convoluted and unintuitive?
 
So you’ll buy stuff in the iTunes app and it’ll transfer over to Music? Like I wonder how that’ll work.


I’m assuming we’ll still sync through iTunes for photos.

Im assuming it’ll be like on iPhone/iPad where you purchase your content through iTunes and it shows up on the respected app. I assume photos will either be iTunes or photos app. Hopefully we will still be able to save iOS backups though locally
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
For iTunes, as Apple don't mess with my library collection I'm fine.

iBooks : I have several paid books purchased, I hope they don't mess it too, whatever it named (iBooks/Book App)

Also I hope Apple include cheese grater in 10.15 compatibility list, since currently we still don't have proper replacement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.