Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How in the world did the 2013 iMac not make the cut? It is faster than the 2013 Macbook Air, has a better display, was introduced later, discontinued later, shares the same iGPU/GPU as supported Macbook Pros... ?

I currently have a Late 2015 21.5” iMac with every upgrade that was offered. So this news makes me very nervous. Honestly, why do supported iMacs start from 2014 when weaker computers can run Big Sur from 2013 on?

Ok, I figured it out. This is the same arbitrary move Apple pulled with Sierra.
The supported line was arbitrarily drawn at '2014 and newer plus 2013 Mac Pro' with older models sharing a model ID with a supported machine also included.

That 2013 Air? Same A1465/A1466 6,1/6,2 model identifier as a 2014 Air. Same story with the Late 2013 Macbook Pro: Both the Late 2013 and 2014 are MacbookPro11.1/2/3 machines.
 
I'm going ahead and installing Big Sur now...downloading was.....nearly painless...

1592864498483.png

[automerge]1592865134[/automerge]
The familiar macOS bootup sound is back!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I was disappointed to see the 'look' of where macOS is headed. I get the desire to unify the aesthetic of all apple OSes but...man. Feels like the soul of the mac is slowly draining. I don't want to stare at a giant ipad when using my mac!

What I find to be a lot disingenuous is, there’s an obvious iOS-ification yet zero acknowledgement. At least, I didn’t hear any acknowledgment of the obvious. Listening to Craig, you’d think this is a brand new, never before seen interface. Yet obvious to all watching, quite a lot of work was done to change the appearance towards iOS.

And, what did does that fix that was broken?

Elephant in the room, anyone?

oh yeah, and all this talk about bezelless design to get more usable workspace — how about reducing the oversize, childish-plain headers above every window with the flat stop sign circles as a first step?

Sorry to be a downer, but too much of OS enhancements over the past seven years are in a direction I find little benefit from.
 
Last edited:
Review?
Are apple crazy?
1. No will emulator for windows more.
2.They will be more hack ipad pro become macos?
3. How much the cost of a12z mac mini? If 1 grand, ehmm aaaa. 2 year a bit odd if sudden a15 willl appear.
4. I seee the era of microsoft uwp.
1. There will be an emulator. Might be a slow one but there will be.
2. Hacking things to run OS that wasn’t designed for it is a gimmick at best. Why bother?
3. Now way that Mac Mini is at a grand. I’d say it will be the same price.
4. Windows has a lot more legacy apps. And to move anything forward takes forever. I don’t see anything happening soon.
 
What I find to be a lot disingenuous is, there’s an obvious iOS-ification yet zero acknowledgement. At least, I didn’t hear any acknowledgment of the obvious. Listening to Craig, you’d think this is a brand new, never before seen interface. Yet obvious to all watching, quite a lot of work was done to change the appearance towards iOS.

And, what did does that fix that was broken?

Elephant in the room, anyone?

oh yeah, and all this talk about bezelless design — how about reducing the oversize, childish-plain headers above every window with the flat stop sign circles?

Sorry to be a downer, but too much of OS enhancements over the past seven years are in a direction I find little benefit from.

I will try their Big “poor” sur on my 2015 MacBook Pro since the 2012 won’t run it. I already don’t like what I am seeing, except for the PowerPC version 2 which is called Apple silicon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tozovac
Steve lied ? It hasn’t been 20 years yet - 2003-2004 is 2024 or 2023 - that’s 20 years.
[automerge]1592872202[/automerge]
Another lie Steve said - “and we have still great PowerPC products yet to come” - May he take that to the grave.
 
Last edited:
Well, Tim also said that they still have Intel Macs in the pipeline, so unless you're going to buy one and stop being upgraded immediately, I would say that they will provide both Intel and A-series versions of macOS for quite some time.

They did say that all Apple macOS Big Sur programs were already converted to A-series, but I would've like to see a Terminal demo to just put my mind at ease.
While not a demo, they did show Terminal in the "We updated all our apps to work on the A-chips!" slide.
Screen Shot 2020-06-22 at 7.43.28 PM.png

--

I'm excited to see how this all plays out regarding the transition. At first, I was a little worried, but going back and watching everything again, I think they have this figured out. They've done it before, and it seems all the pieces are there to make it seamless for most (if not everyone) people using the Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Steve lied ? It hasn’t been 20 years yet - 2003-2004 is 2024 or 2023 - that’s 20 years.
[automerge]1592872202[/automerge]
Another lie Steve said - “and we have still great PowerPC products yet to come” - May he take that to the grave.

I was just quoting his words that came out of his mouth. Disagree, but its the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
1. There will be an emulator. Might be a slow one but there will be.
2. Hacking things to run OS that wasn’t designed for it is a gimmick at best. Why bother?
3. Now way that Mac Mini is at a grand. I’d say it will be the same price.
4. Windows has a lot more legacy apps. And to move anything forward takes forever. I don’t see anything happening soon.
1. slow the main issue, currently sq1 still slow render windows x86 which market still struggle.
2. Cost and avaibility unknown test device loan.
3. Now i read they charge the mac mini as loan, 500 usd is okay but loan?
4. Yeah same think also.
 
I really can't wait until people who can run some benchmarks get their hands on a device with this chip.
How soon they forget PowerPC and Rosetta. They are showing some applications that were using Rosetta, and game in arcade, but how about processor intensive examples. Yeah we know about doing photoshop and final cut on a iPad Pro. But a multi core ARM with built in GPU doesn't exactly equate to the same performance as a workstation. How about running VM? Lots of issues running linux on ARM. What does this do to anyone wanting to port games and you have Rosetta again. While the demo's show ARM being more capable now, I'm still left wondering is it a bit early still? :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.