worldvirus
macrumors member
I'm still confused by this, at a time when internationally America is a "bit on the nose" it doesn't seem like a great commercial decision naming an OS in such a US centric or nationalistic way
He might have asked for it...I'm still confused by this, at a time when internationally America is a "bit on the nose" it doesn't seem like a great commercial decision naming an OS in such a US centric or nationalistic way
Everyone who has been to the Bay Area with a proper camera has taken that shot at Marshalls/Baker beach. Those rocks might be photographed as much as the Eiffel tower or Cinderella castle.
Yeah, I remember. I wasn’t crazy about the Catalina wallpaper, but it was better than the abstracts. Mohave was pretty good (also my favorite version of macOS—it was rock solid), but I miss the Lion, Mountain Lion, Yosemite, and El Capitan wallpapers.They have been using wavy colors or abstract as the default since macOS 11 Big Sur. The last time they used a realistic photo was macOS 10.15 Catalina. And now we have this, but not as the default.
Last good one was macOS Mojave
I have an idea. Link it to storage or memory status. The more full it is, the foggier the wallpaper.I like that photo.
Wonder if there will also be one where it is foggy 😱 😎
Animated screensaver, two separate options
View attachment 2643557
You can still find them… it’s not like they have gone away.Mohave was pretty good (also my favorite version of macOS—it was rock solid), but I miss the Lion, Mountain Lion, Yosemite, and El Capitan wallpapers.
It’s nice to have both. Good aesthetics and a solid platform form the Apple experience, at its optimum. 😉I’d prefer to see bugs quashed then to have a pretty wallpaper that has likely been retouched and color graded out of reality.
Could be because no one on the internet can afford to live or visit SF! I heard it was $6000/mo minimum to rent a 1bdrm apartment.I just really wish San Francisco was promoted a little more heavily. No one on the internet ever talks about it!
It’s doubtful that a photo like that would’ve cost them much money at all. Besides, Apple likely has their own media budget for things like this. For all we know, it might even have been a free contribution volunteered by somebody within the company, or maybe they hold internal photo contests where employees freely contribute their own work.This is ridiculous. Apple wastes all this effort taking beautiful photos when we can just generate our own wallpapers with Image Playground. No wonder memory is so expensive now… hope that photo shoot was worth it.
Exactly! What a waste of all that high-quality photography, especially if it’s fostering some kind of community too. Image Playground would’ve spared us the unnecessary artistic detail, kept people nicely isolated, and given us a perfectly mediocre result instead.It’s doubtful that a photo like that would’ve cost them much money at all. Besides, Apple likely has their own media budget for things like this. For all we know, it might even have been a free contribution volunteered by somebody within the company, or maybe they hold internal photo contests where employees freely contribute their own work.
It’s highly questionable that one would be able to come up with something at this level of detail and realism with Image Playground.