Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Everyone who has been to the Bay Area with a proper camera has taken that shot at Marshalls/Baker beach. Those rocks might be photographed as much as the Eiffel tower or Cinderella castle.

I just really wish San Francisco was promoted a little more heavily. No one on the internet ever talks about it!
 
They have been using wavy colors or abstract as the default since macOS 11 Big Sur. The last time they used a realistic photo was macOS 10.15 Catalina. And now we have this, but not as the default.
Yeah, I remember. I wasn’t crazy about the Catalina wallpaper, but it was better than the abstracts. Mohave was pretty good (also my favorite version of macOS—it was rock solid), but I miss the Lion, Mountain Lion, Yosemite, and El Capitan wallpapers.
 
I’m one of the longest serving members here and the fact this is exciting to people or even worthy of its own front page post is kind of crazy to me. I’d prefer to see bugs quashed then to have a pretty wallpaper that has likely been retouched and color graded out of reality.
 
This is ridiculous. Apple wastes all this effort taking beautiful photos when we can just generate our own wallpapers with Image Playground. No wonder memory is so expensive now… hope that photo shoot was worth it.
 
This is ridiculous. Apple wastes all this effort taking beautiful photos when we can just generate our own wallpapers with Image Playground. No wonder memory is so expensive now… hope that photo shoot was worth it.
It’s doubtful that a photo like that would’ve cost them much money at all. Besides, Apple likely has their own media budget for things like this. For all we know, it might even have been a free contribution volunteered by somebody within the company, or maybe they hold internal photo contests where employees freely contribute their own work.

It’s highly questionable that one would be able to come up with something at this level of detail and realism with Image Playground.
 
It’s doubtful that a photo like that would’ve cost them much money at all. Besides, Apple likely has their own media budget for things like this. For all we know, it might even have been a free contribution volunteered by somebody within the company, or maybe they hold internal photo contests where employees freely contribute their own work.

It’s highly questionable that one would be able to come up with something at this level of detail and realism with Image Playground.
Exactly! What a waste of all that high-quality photography, especially if it’s fostering some kind of community too. Image Playground would’ve spared us the unnecessary artistic detail, kept people nicely isolated, and given us a perfectly mediocre result instead.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.