Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
“Trusted Software” is an interesting term. I’m not sure why I should trust Apple on this. Lately, not only security but also economic and increasingly political reasons have been relevant for Apple when notarizing an App, hence giving it the “Trusted Software” label. “Trusted” for Apple does not necessarily mean it is in the customer's best interest.
Apple isn’t providing security guarantees nor did it ever imply. It’s like Apple performed trust checks, and validated the developer.
 
to be fair i'm rather advanced user and until today didn't know this was a thing
since you actually might trick regular users into opening unsigned app (ie. by providing an installation instruction before downloading an app), i think its a good thing this is removed.
 
The malwares nowadays ship with a "Control-click to run" text, so the tech illiterates unfortunately know.

The problem I have with this is... how is this new inconvenience any different from malware launching System Settings and shipping an image with a bright red arrow saying 'Click this'? This doesn't really offer any new level of safety. It just makes it mildly more inconvenient. People who would have fallen for 'Control-click to run' are going to approve it in System Settings just as readily.
 
Not only are they not allowing alternative app stores on iOS, but they are cracking down on third party apps on the Mac, something the user should have complete control over. I should be able to select the level of security I want on my third party apps and unsigned applications. This is 100% about diverting people to the App Store for revenue and in a few more iterations of MacOS, we will need to jailbreak it to regain control.
 
You are correct. macOS isn’t the OS you want if you don’t want some form of hand holding. Same with Windows. If you’re smart enough to go out on your own and not need someone to protect you then it’s Linux.
It has nothing to do with being smart. I run a Linux workstation, the amount of rogue libraries in Linux is a huge problem. They all creep in to distributions pretty easily. Just recently, a Microsoft researcher was troubleshooting delay in login on Linux, found a Critical Vulnerability. My Linux workstation doesn’t have any confidential personal info, but if I was using it for banking and others, I would be very careful.

 
I have a certain feeling that EU won‘t like it…


a-powerful-and-dramatic-rendering-of-the-european--EruSa9wgRqacHlF30eNNOA-432oJ3r4TtuONp5ZQUd...jpeg
 
In my experience with macOS 15 beta 1. You can still run those apps by set in Settings. Similar to use 3rd party kernel extensions. You will find the prompt under Privacy & Security after Finder rejects you to run those apps. Then you can run them like before.
 
Literally nothing ever happened overriding Gatekeeper for cracked software and keygens etc.
Since Mac is crazy expensive to me in my country so always I had 90% of software pirated.
 
The tech illiterate wouldn’t know about the Control-Click shortcut.

For power users, this is a step back imo.
There was some Malware with the Control-Click shortcut in the installation instructions. This should help with tech illiterate users who wouldn't question that instruction for their "free" software.
 
Good. Anything to help the tech illiterate gullible keep from compromising themselves. For users who know what they are doing, no big issue at all if they want to install unsigned apps from god knows where. More power to them but no sympathy of they get nailed.
I find Apple's major audience with computers is the complete opposite of what it is with iPhones, so I don't get why they treat us like iPhone users. Like 99% I know who have Macs got them because they are power users and very tech literate - developers, designers and such. This is only making it more annoying for us to install all the weird silly stuff from Github that was last updated in 2011 but is needed for some niche reason.

I can't be bothered with the App Store and the more they push it to people like us in industries where nobody can wait for their app review stuff or cares for following their design or whatever guidelines, the more they piss me off. A lot of the stuff we use isn't an end consumer app - it's a tool to do a technical job. Other part of it was written by another team member to do something specific and nobody cares about notarizing it because it's for internal use. Having to go to settings and tell the computer that I want to open the app that I already told it I want to open is annoying.
 
Last edited:
Apple is eliminating the option to Control-click to open Mac software that is not correctly signed or notarized in macOS Sequoia. To install apps that Gatekeeper blocks, users will need to open up System Settings and go to the Privacy and Security section to "review security information" before being able to run the software.
Shouldn’t create any issues, utilities I am using are all not from the App Store and work OK.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.